justinsayne
Cody Rhodes is an excellant
Well this could either be fun or end up completely flopping, but what about a gimmick tourny?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What?!?! Why?
I was a nooooob during the Legends tourny and movies tourny. I want to do them over.
What?!?! Why?
It's not though. the WZ tourney has active wrestlers The Legends Tourney doesn't . That fact alone makes it very different also the voting criteria are completely different.The Legend's tournament was probably good, but with the Wrestlezone tournament it just seems pointless.
Because, as Murfish said after me, the Movie section has all kinds of potential for a great Tournament. I commend Papa Shango for his efforts last year, but there should never have been a straight-up movie tournament (how the hell can you do a movie tournament when you have literally tens of thousands to choose from?). The Directors Tournament would be much more encompassing, and we could discuss who has the best filmography, who has been the most influential, whether awards or box office gross mean more to the reputation of a director, etc.
Jake proposed a franchise tournament instead. I would prefer the Directors Tournament, but I understand that the franchise tournament would have much more appeal. But, if we don't get pretentious with the directors we choose to be in the Tournament, I think we'll be fine.
I think the biggest problem with the movie tourny, and the reason I didn't like it was largely do to the fact that they mixed movies from every genre together, I mean seriously how the fuck do you have anything resemble an intelligent debate when you get match ups like The Muppets Movie vs. Schindler's List?!, that's just stupid, they should have down a tourny for each genre IMO, I think that's way the music tourny worked out so well, it was all rock for the most part
It's nice to know you can read people's mind over the internet and tell what people have interest in or have knowledge of.Back when it existed, the pioneer section of the Old School section got absolutely no traffic. The number of people on this forum who possess interest in, and knowledge of, old school wrestling can be counted on one hand, and none of them are Milenko.
It was last years Legends Tournament that helped me get my name out, and I still voted no.
Back when it existed, the pioneer section of the Old School section got absolutely no traffic. The number of people on this forum who possess interest in, and knowledge of, old school wrestling can be counted on one hand, and none of them are Milenko.
The original managed to somehow avoid including Gotch, Hackenschmidt, Wagner, Lewis or many other names from the pioneer era, and if it had included them then those threads would have likely achieved a grand total of two or three posts each. As memory serves, quite a lot of the match ups last year didn't even accomplish that.
It's nice to know you can read people's mind over the internet and tell what people have interest in or have knowledge of.
My defense doesn't mean I have no interest in Old School Wrestling. When I have an interest in something I study it using more than Wikipedia.I'm pretty sure you said, as a defence for writing factfiles on people using wikipedia, that you only started watching wrestling recently and didn't know much about old timers. That would suggest that you don't really have much of an interest in Ed "The Strangler" Lewis.
The fuck gave you that Idea?So you don't have an interest in women's wrestling then?
The fuck gave you that Idea?
you said:When I have an interest in something I study it using more than Wikipedia.