Little Jerry Lawler
Sigmund Freud On Ritalin And Roids
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha. Ok now that I got that out of my system.
There are a few things to me that go into a great title reign
1. Entertainment- With Santino I liked the Honk-o-Meter and that part of it was entertaining for a while but once the microphone was put down and the matches started the entertainment value went away.
2. Match Quality- Santino had a total of ZERO good matches during his title reigns. He was a comedy jobber with a belt and all of his matches reflected that.
3. Good Feuds- The only real feud Santino had in his first reign was against Chris Masters. It sucked, and nobody cared. The only feud in his second reign was with a 55 year old retired wrestler from the 80's. I don't even know if I'd consider it a feud since Honky only made like 2 appearances.
4. Make people care about the title (Prestige)- A comedy jobber holding a mid card title does nothing but make the title look bad. Santino as champion had matches with the likes of D'Lo Brown, Deuce, and Snitsky. He only defended the title 3 times, only had one victory in those defenses, and it was with interference. Nobody gave a flying fuck about the IC title at that time. It was a prop that was used so they could do the Honk-o-Meter thing with Santino. That's it.
Like I said earlier the Honk-o-meter was entertaining for a few weeks but after a while even that was getting old. And that ONE thing in know way made Santino a good IC champ.
Nobody gave a fuck about the title because the wrestlers themselves didn't give a fuck about the title because they put the belt on wrestlers who had feuds in which the belt meant nothing. Since the IC belt was brought back, there has only been one damn IC title match at WM and that lasted 21 seconds. Santino was one of the few who actually cared about keeping the title and that to me makes him the best. JBL didn't always have great matches as world champion but he cared about keeping the belt which made him a good world champion to me.