Religion | Page 3 | WrestleZone Forums

Religion

The evolutionary process. Monkeys evolved into modern day humans, but not directly. By that, I mean that they evolved into slightly more intelligent monkeys, then monkeys that stood upright, then monkeys with opposable thumbs, until modern day humans were produced. Evolution is the process through which a random mutation takes place in an animal's genes. Often, this animal will be at a disadvantage and die, but occasionally, this animal's mutation (for example, opposable thumbs) will allow it to thrive and become a new variation of it's species. This animal in turn evolves after another "successful" mutation takes place. Often, the animal from which the new animal is evolved from will die die out, but just as often, they won't. That's why monkeys, which we are not directly evolved from are still alive. However, there is much evidence for evolution through fossils/bones found of Neanderthals (the so-called "missing link") and other, less evolved creatures. Remember, evolution doesn't apply just to humans. Every creature alive today, even bacteria, is evolved to some point. So as to say, one of it's ancestor's was subject to a random mutation that, fortunately, allowed it to survive rather than die.

You might say that is unlikely, but the wealth of scientific evidence behind it is massive. It's almost impossible to watch evolution take place, as it takes place over millions of years, or thousands at the least, and successful mutations are very rare and often takes place away from the human eye. Through fossils, arranged in the correct order, you can actually see evolution take place, unless you choose to see the startling similarities but distinct differences between closely related animals as some test from God, or whatever excuse have you.

The Bible states that the Earth is roughly thousands of years old, however, scientific evidence (specifically, carbon dating, amongst other forms) shows that it is clearly billions of years old.

The evidence behind science's point of view? Research done over hundreds of years by great men, open to criticism, change and disapproval, based on what is most likely, what has the most evidence standing behind it.

The "evidence" behind religion's point of view? What's been written behind closed doors in books, for debatable purposes. What's been taught as absolute fact until recently, until science suggested otherwise, when religion (some aspects of it, anyway) flip-flopped in the face of such strong evidence, begging people to believe their sacred teachings aren't meant to be taken literally after all. Those that do take it literally are now often considered the extremists, the fundamentalists, the crackpots and even the dangerous psychopaths in some cases. 99.9% of people were that just hundreds of years ago.
 
Im catholic and I do belive God helps me thourgh my toughest hours.Whenever Im going to school I,ll say a prayer and say "Oh my scared heart of jesus I place all my trust in you".Life was hell for the first half of the school year.Look now.Top class and loving life.

Say my prayers every night.Go to mass every week.Do the faith friends thing.And every time something good happens......I know theres someone up there helping me.There is a God.
 
So the first half of the year you weren't doing well, were you being faithful? I'm not going to disrespect your beliefs, at least I won't intentionally, but there have been plenty of people who have lead happy, successful lives without religion.

I'm very happy with my life and I'm not in any way religious. I try to be totally independent - from other people, from God, from most things really.

Faith is a great thing to have, I just can't see the reasoning behind it.
 
No reasoning behind it? What about the things that are unexplainable? I'm sure you've experienced things in life that lacked reason. How do you justify those?
 
With reason. I don't say, "this defies reason, let's just say God did it." You should wait until a probable explanation is available. When a scientific explanation seems implausible, why does a supernatural one become plausible by default? It doesn't. Besides, the universe is primarily chaotic, and events take place at random, meaning, pretty much, everything is coincidental and lacks reason. Only by human interference do we give reason.

Think of the amount of this universe we are incapable of interfering with, and, to a still massively large degree, the planet we inhabit, particularly when all six billion of us have different wants and needs and only certain people have any real power.
 
Well seeings as I don't believe in God, I'll have to go with Evolution. However the matter isn't something I've given much thought to.

I just can't see their being someone above us who's all power and could stop an suffering, yet doesn't. Or only chooses to give 'miracles' to certain people.

Evolution makes sense. It makes sense that over the years people will evolve to become better adapted for whatever purpose.
 
I just can't see their being someone above us who's all power and could stop an suffering, yet doesn't. Or only chooses to give 'miracles' to certain people.

Sweetie, I'm not trying to step in on your belief, or disbelief.. but from what I've come to learn.. God can't just willingly make everyone who asks for it, happy. God can't just take away all the suffering, because if God did.. noone would learn from it. And thats the overall gift God wants for us, at least through my belief.

I've been through personal hell, & have believed to hit rock bottom on one occation. I never wish to be that low again, or even lower, which is always a possibility. However, I came to find belief in myself.. & I also think thats what God wants. You have to find the inner strength, to believe in yourself, to know you can overcome anything set forth in your way, & to just believe in yourself & have faith that anything is possible.

Regarding the miracles.. unfortunately, I don't know what to tell you. I've asked for prayers to come true, I've asked for selfish desires, & selfless requests for others. And within that, I don't honestly think any have come true. But then again, maybe they have & just not in the exact way we asked for them. Maybe it merely takes us to look harder, to see it.

I wish almost every night for those I love to remain protected & safe. For those I love, who hurt, to be released from their pain, from their suffering. I've even brought forth that I'd be willing to take on the world's pain as a whole.. so one person (myself) can suffer, while the rest live in peace. Its just not something thats happened, though. :(

I believe God gives us balance.. enough happiness, well being & overall success to know life is worth living.. but refuses to fix all the suffering, pain & torture.. so that we can continue to learn, unfortunately, from our own sinful mistakes.

Personally, I have a theory that would create a previous & next life for us. I believe that we each go through what we do, as a way, a result, to pay for what we've done in a previous life. And maybe thats foolish to think, I'm not saying it isn't. But from personal pain & suffering.. I question a lot on what I could've done in this life, to deserve it.. & I've come to feel maybe it wasn't what I did here.. but before, somewhere else.. & I'm merely having to pain the cost of that, now.

Evolution makes sense. It makes sense that over the years people will evolve to become better adapted for whatever purpose.

Where did we start, if it was all evolution though? Monkeys? Apes? How was life just "created" in general? Thats the thing thats the hardest to factor in.

Again, I'm not trying to shove some belief of what you can't see, or think down your throat. Being who I am, I'm open to believing ANYTHING is indeed possible, including the possibility that God isn't there.

I just need the prove to know the difference.. & while I can't prove God is or isn't there, I have faith in my heart, & belief in my head that God is.. there. And maybe thats what some people need to get through the day? The knowledge, & possibility of a "higher being" watching over them, making sure that they won't ever go through anything that this "being" believes they couldn't handle.. giving them the strength to live on through the torment.

I love you for who you are personally, & I'll stand beside you in your beliefs, because I won't disagree with anyone on this matter. I'll be as open as they come to it. At some point, I'd merely like proof, knowledge, or something that can prove one way or another what the truth really is.
 
Before I get started on this I just want to make sure you understand that I have the utmost respect for Will as a person and recognise he is entitled to his beliefs. This is in no way a personal attack, but rather an attempt to continue a debate. I am merely reacting to a point.

Sweetie, I'm not trying to step in on your belief, or disbelief.. but from what I've come to learn.. God can't just willingly make everyone who asks for it, happy. God can't just take away all the suffering, because if God did.. noone would learn from it. And thats the overall gift God wants for us, at least through my belief.

If you do subscribe to the theory that God is all powerful, which I believe the Bible teaches, why not merely create perfect humans, ones that require no teaching and will not be tempted by things that aren't "pure"? If he's not all-powerful, it's a valid point. It is, however, contradicted by the fact that there's no remotely conclusive evidence God exists.

I've been through personal hell, & have believed to hit rock bottom on one occation. I never wish to be that low again, or even lower, which is always a possibility. However, I came to find belief in myself.. & I also think thats what God wants. You have to find the inner strength, to believe in yourself, to know you can overcome anything set forth in your way, & to just believe in yourself & have faith that anything is possible.

I agree with you almost fully. However, I have no ideas why these feelings of self-belief and self-confidence cannot be presence without God. I believe it can be, and is. However, I believe the fact that religious people have these sorts of reactions faster and recover more often is merely a psychological reaction and nothing supernatural. What God wants doesn't factor into my life at all, although I like to believe I'm a good person; I don't go out of my way to hurt other people's feelings and am generally friendly, I rarely do anything that would be considered out of the ordinary or mean.

Regarding the miracles.. unfortunately, I don't know what to tell you. I've asked for prayers to come true, I've asked for selfish desires, & selfless requests for others. And within that, I don't honestly think any have come true. But then again, maybe they have & just not in the exact way we asked for them. Maybe it merely takes us to look harder, to see it.

Sorry if this feels a little raw, but I believe that your last point merely validates mine more. It's the old "miracles are all around" argument. Well, yes, they are all around if you choose to merely point to the good aspects of life and say "that's a miracle". If you look hard enough for something, you'll often end up seeing it, even if it's not truly there.

I wish almost every night for those I love to remain protected & safe. For those I love, who hurt, to be released from their pain, from their suffering. I've even brought forth that I'd be willing to take on the world's pain as a whole.. so one person (myself) can suffer, while the rest live in peace. Its just not something thats happened, though. :(

Well, yea...

I believe God gives us balance.. enough happiness, well being & overall success to know life is worth living.. but refuses to fix all the suffering, pain & torture.. so that we can continue to learn, unfortunately, from our own sinful mistakes.

If you take a closer look at life, I think the old phrase "life isn't fair" sums it up. You talk of balance; there is none. There's a remarkable amount when you compare to humanity's earlier stages; ironically, those when we were more spiritual, but there's still very little. The greedy and the "evil" often gain more than the selfless and the kind. The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. There's next to no balance and things, unless a human intervenes, do not fix themselves.

Personally, I have a theory that would create a previous & next life for us. I believe that we each go through what we do, as a way, a result, to pay for what we've done in a previous life. And maybe thats foolish to think, I'm not saying it isn't. But from personal pain & suffering.. I question a lot on what I could've done in this life, to deserve it.. & I've come to feel maybe it wasn't what I did here.. but before, somewhere else.. & I'm merely having to pain the cost of that, now.

I don't really want to question you here as, by some cosmic coincidence, you could be right. However, I'd say your theory is like any other religious theory, without conclusive backing. Of course, it's fine for people to believe it, but I believe it's wrong.

Where did we start, if it was all evolution though? Monkeys? Apes? How was life just "created" in general? Thats the thing thats the hardest to factor in.

Simple: coincidence. The universe is vast, uncaring and chaotic. We're not here on purpose. We're not here by mistake. We're just here.
Again, I'm not trying to shove some belief of what you can't see, or think down your throat. Being who I am, I'm open to believing ANYTHING is indeed possible, including the possibility that God isn't there.

Well, yea...

I just need the prove to know the difference.. & while I can't prove God is or isn't there, I have faith in my heart, & belief in my head that God is.. there. And maybe thats what some people need to get through the day? The knowledge, & possibility of a "higher being" watching over them, making sure that they won't ever go through anything that this "being" believes they couldn't handle.. giving them the strength to live on through the torment.

I love you for who you are personally, & I'll stand beside you in your beliefs, because I won't disagree with anyone on this matter. I'll be as open as they come to it. At some point, I'd merely like proof, knowledge, or something that can prove one way or another what the truth really is.

Like I've said before, it's near impossible to prove a negative, particularly on these massive proportions. Absolute, conclusive proof is non-existent, for anything. Even the fact that we live this life is not conclusive evidence that it exists. However, the massive likelihood is that it is. Therefore, I live by what is most likely. What is most likely? That we're on our own on this desolate rock, for no purpose but that we give ourselves? Or that we're being watched by an omnipotent being that has a perfect plan for everything, no matter how imperfect everything may seem?

I'll go for the former.
 
First of all, we need to decide which definition of "god" to which we are referring. If you are referring to "the one Supreme being, the creator and ruler of the universe," then it is important to capitalize "God." However, it is safe to say in all of our lives that there are certain "gods" to which we find our ultimate concern being placed. This is sometimes money, sex, drugs, power, violence, silly clowns, etc.

But I'm sure we're discussing "God" since this is the religion thread. I believe in God because it makes sense to me. I sense this communication going on between myself and this invisible, formless force, and therefore, my reality is that God is real. It's like sitting next to a person and communicating with him or her. It is possible that he or she doesn't really exist and that I'm losing my mind, but it makes the most sense that the person is real and that I actually am talking to he or she.

The thing with God for me is that it is a complete and utter mystery. Are God and evolution at odds with each other? No, I don't think so. I think it's plausible to think that God has set in motion the nature of the world. But then again, it's equally plausible that it could have happened by chance. There's pretty much a 50% chance that God exists. He either does or he does not.

And when looking at the Bible, please do not look at it as a history book. It is not. It is a book of faith. It has a bunch of different authors and a council of dudes decided which books would make up the canon. I think that a lot of it is metaphorical and not literal. Yet, because it is not literal, it does not make it any less true for me. For example, I think that Adam and Eve is metaphor. I don't really think that I believe that Adam and Eve were literally walking in this paradisical garden being all chummy with a physical God. I don't think that there was a talking snake or some magical tree that caused mankind to gain the knowledge of good and evil. HOWEVER: I think this story is extremely TRUE. It is true in the sense that man and woman often blatantly defies orders from superiors, thinking that they know better than their master. It is true in my experience, as I often defy God's commands, thinking that I know what they really mean or what is actually the best thing to do.
 
If you do subscribe to the theory that God is all powerful, which I believe the Bible teaches, why not merely create perfect humans, ones that require no teaching and will not be tempted by things that aren't "pure"? If he's not all-powerful, it's a valid point. It is, however, contradicted by the fact that there's no remotely conclusive evidence God exists.

The way I see it is that life is a test. If you pass the test you go to heaven, if you don't you go to hell. To pass the test (IMO) you have to follow the teachings of Jesus, and stay true to the bible. If God created us all perfect, our stay on this planet would be pointless. There is no eveidence that there is a God, but that's where you're faith comes in. You have to believe tere is a higher power, you have to belive in God. IMO that's part of the test.

I agree with you almost fully. However, I have no ideas why these feelings of self-belief and self-confidence cannot be presence without God. I believe it can be, and is. However, I believe the fact that religious people have these sorts of reactions faster and recover more often is merely a psychological reaction and nothing supernatural. What God wants doesn't factor into my life at all, although I like to believe I'm a good person; I don't go out of my way to hurt other people's feelings and am generally friendly, I rarely do anything that would be considered out of the ordinary or mean.

Each faith gives you you're own sle-confidence/self-belief. For example: Will gets his self-confidence from beliving in God, while you get yours by juts being a person. You may be a good person, but (IMO) that's only part of the test. Not being Christian does not make you a bad person.

Sorry if this feels a little raw, but I believe that your last point merely validates mine more. It's the old "miracles are all around" argument. Well, yes, they are all around if you choose to merely point to the good aspects of life and say "that's a miracle". If you look hard enough for something, you'll often end up seeing it, even if it's not truly there.

People, don't tend to see the good in life, they tend to see the bad. That's why it's harder to see miracles happen. But (IMO) they are a part of everyday life. God loves us all, and if we love and trust him, we will be blessed with miracles.


If you take a closer look at life, I think the old phrase "life isn't fair" sums it up. You talk of balance; there is none. There's a remarkable amount when you compare to humanity's earlier stages; ironically, those when we were more spiritual, but there's still very little. The greedy and the "evil" often gain more than the selfless and the kind. The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. There's next to no balance and things, unless a human intervenes, do not fix themselves.

See above.

I don't really want to question you here as, by some cosmic coincidence, you could be right. However, I'd say your theory is like any other religious theory, without conclusive backing. Of course, it's fine for people to believe it, but I believe it's wrong.

It's all up to you, yourself, to be either: Catholic, Muslim Jewish, Atheist...etc.
It's all your choice. There isn't any backing, but like I said earlier you have to belive.

Simple: coincidence. The universe is vast, uncaring and chaotic. We're not here on purpose. We're not here by mistake. We're just here.

In my opinion, we are here on purpose. To pass the test of life.


Like I've said before, it's near impossible to prove a negative, particularly on these massive proportions. Absolute, conclusive proof is non-existent, for anything. Even the fact that we live this life is not conclusive evidence that it exists. However, the massive likelihood is that it is. Therefore, I live by what is most likely. What is most likely? That we're on our own on this desolate rock, for no purpose but that we give ourselves? Or that we're being watched by an omnipotent being that has a perfect plan for everything, no matter how imperfect everything may seem?

I'll go for the former.

Like I said many times earlier, this is my opinion you don't have to belive it.
 
I'm a Christian and do not believe that life is a "test." I possess the mindset that God is a fatherish figure, not some kind of scientist trying to see if we can find the cheese at the end of the maze. Maybe God created us just because he could. Or that he wanted to watch us grow and develop a relationship with us. I want to get married and have a lot of babies. I want to coach Little League baseball, I want to teach my son how to successfully apply the Figure 4 Leg Lock, and I want to have a daughter so that I can scare the crap out of teenage boys who try to go out with her. I think that's because it's my nature. Maybe that's God's nature, too.
 
Before I get started on this I just want to make sure you understand that I have the utmost respect for Will as a person and recognise he is entitled to his beliefs. This is in no way a personal attack, but rather an attempt to continue a debate. I am merely reacting to a point.

Sam, I wouldn't take any type of offense to what you, or anyone else would have to say regarding religion. The only people I generally dislike regarding religion, are those who refuse to think everyone should have their own opinion, especially if it isn't what "they" believe in.

I'm open to believing anything is possible, I don't know how many times I've said, or will continue to say that. And noone, religious or otherwise, is going to make me believe one set of anything, unless it can without a shadow of a doubt be proven true. With all that said.. you, my friend, have my respect in whatever your opinion is, even especially if it isn't my own.

If you do subscribe to the theory that God is all powerful, which I believe the Bible teaches, why not merely create perfect humans, ones that require no teaching and will not be tempted by things that aren't "pure"? If he's not all-powerful, it's a valid point. It is, however, contradicted by the fact that there's no remotely conclusive evidence God exists.

In my belief, the reason God didn't creat everyone perfect, is because how can you learn whats right & wrong? How can you live for yourself, or think for yourself? The human condition is to make mistakes.. & then to learn from them.

Noone in life can say they haven't did one thing that was wrong, or something in which they had to decide a path. Noone can say that they didn't have an at least small thought on having to decide upon one thing or another. That is what humans, to me, are. We have free will, & complete control to make our own decisions. If God made us perfect, without flaw.. then we wouldn't likely be where we are today. Because (again, my theory) I'm sure we've made several mistakes, to find the ultimate path.

I agree with you almost fully. However, I have no ideas why these feelings of self-belief and self-confidence cannot be presence without God. I believe it can be, and is. However, I believe the fact that religious people have these sorts of reactions faster and recover more often is merely a psychological reaction and nothing supernatural. What God wants doesn't factor into my life at all, although I like to believe I'm a good person; I don't go out of my way to hurt other people's feelings and am generally friendly, I rarely do anything that would be considered out of the ordinary or mean.

Like I said, perhaps its more of a mindset that people who believe a religious power is watching over them, helps them to succeed more. Its a personal belief in themselves, its what each person has to get by. You said you feel you're a good person, & you're generally happy with yourself, without knowing it has anything to do with God.

Thats not a bad thing, thats your decision to make. Thats your belief to have. However, just like when a religious person believes some "higher being" to be watching over them.. its not to say its a lie. Whereas just like you say God has nothing to do with it, its also not to say its a lie. Its really a stale-mate of sorts, as neither side can conclusively prove the other wrong, without a shadow of a doubt.

Sorry if this feels a little raw, but I believe that your last point merely validates mine more. It's the old "miracles are all around" argument. Well, yes, they are all around if you choose to merely point to the good aspects of life and say "that's a miracle". If you look hard enough for something, you'll often end up seeing it, even if it's not truly there.

Its very true that if you look hard enough to see something, your mind will create the illusions for you. Just like for me, for example.. I guess if I believe no matter what I do, something will always go wrong in the time between Thanksgiving & the end of Jan.. that I'll always find a way to create that to come true.

However you can't discount that there have been rare occurrences that have happened, in which all logic escapes. If you ask me what, I'd really have to think to find them, but I'm sure I could. (this is where someone who knows the bible, or history in general would come in more handy)

As far as pointing out everything good, claiming it to be a miracle, no, thats not what "I" would consider a miracle to be. Winning $20.00 off a lottery ticket, its a nice surprise.. not a miracle. Having your name drawn in a raffle, & winning a car.. again, its a great surprise.. not a miracle.

I see a miracle being something that is given to someone who doesn't "want" it, but instead "needs" it & simply can't get that on their own. Such as a mystical cure to something doctor's couldn't explain. A disease that randomly cured itself, which has happened.

If you take a closer look at life, I think the old phrase "life isn't fair" sums it up. You talk of balance; there is none. There's a remarkable amount when you compare to humanity's earlier stages; ironically, those when we were more spiritual, but there's still very little. The greedy and the "evil" often gain more than the selfless and the kind. The poor get poorer and the rich get richer. There's next to no balance and things, unless a human intervenes, do not fix themselves.

I think you're looking too hard at the negative things, to see all the positive things that balance it out though. Yes, crime rates are high, poverty & homeless situations are at outrageous numbers.. but that doesn't mean they out-weigh situations that balance.

You talk about rich getting richer, & poor getting poorer.. but do those rich people have the love of friendships, or solid family? Do they have the type of unity that poor people have? I highly doubt it. Because one of the negative sides of being rich, is you become greedy, & then untrusting. You never know who is true, & who is just after your money.

Personally, I'd love to be rich.. but I'd never wish to give up the feeling of true love for anything. And if it took living in a box, behind some rundown restaurant, eating trash.. as long as I had the true love of someone that made me happy to be alive, as long as I had my own happiness, its all I feel I'd need.

Of course I'd never wish or hope to be that low in life, but its an example of saying.. just because things don't look like they're the greatest, don't mean they aren't equally balanced out. Its all on how you look at it.

I don't really want to question you here as, by some cosmic coincidence, you could be right. However, I'd say your theory is like any other religious theory, without conclusive backing. Of course, it's fine for people to believe it, but I believe it's wrong.

Well, like I said. I'm definately not discounting that it isn't true. I'm not discounting that when you die, you're simply dead. I don't know what life is. I don't understand what keeps us alive, breathing, seeing, speaking. I don't understand what keeps us driven. Does that make sense?

As a result, I don't know where we'll go upon passing away. I like to believe there could be a Heaven, or a chance to relive this life over, or go into another one for that matter.

I've said it several times, I've been through world's of personal demons & hellish events. I've had my share of pain, & honestly at times I feel it doesn't equal out to the same amount of happiness. (But its not to say it doesn't, its again, all on how you see it) However, that all being said. I'd relive this life, through the world of torment & personal hell I've had.. simply to relive less than a handful of moments that make me love this life, regardless of the pain it brings.

Simple: coincidence. The universe is vast, uncaring and chaotic. We're not here on purpose. We're not here by mistake. We're just here.

That sounds like more of an opinion than a fact though. And as such, you, just like "I", have no solid proof that thats true. You mentioned the bible thinking the earth is only thousands of years old, whereas science claims its billions. The one thing I've come to learn, is while the bible may or may not hold truth.. it was written by man, & anything man says, can't always be taken for solid truthfulness, without questioning if something was even in the slightest, taken out of context.

Like I've said before, it's near impossible to prove a negative, particularly on these massive proportions. Absolute, conclusive proof is non-existent, for anything. Even the fact that we live this life is not conclusive evidence that it exists. However, the massive likelihood is that it is. Therefore, I live by what is most likely. What is most likely? That we're on our own on this desolate rock, for no purpose but that we give ourselves? Or that we're being watched by an omnipotent being that has a perfect plan for everything, no matter how imperfect everything may seem?

I'll go for the former.

Just like you said, I can not prove beyond a shadow of a doubt God is or isn't real. That we do or don't exist for a purpose, or that we're merely just "here." Its all in what you decide to believe.

My only question would truly be, what makes you not believe in God? Was it something cruel that happened upon childhood? Was it a prayer that never got answered? Or was it merely you don't want to put faith in the in-explainable?

I wanted to hate the belief of God so much when I lost my ex-fiance'. I wanted to take my own life, because I felt nothing was simply worth anything anymore, & I couldn't find an explanation on why God didn't intervene & help us to work. But that was me hating more of myself, & the course of life that just happens. You can't "make" one person see what you see, or live what you live.

And in that time, perhaps the "miracle" that truly happened was that I was allowed to see what I would've never seen before, in that I mean.. I found personal happiness in myself. I found personal belief that I would survive without anyone, without a relationship. And in that, I believe thats what God wanted for me to see, all along. So by that.. unfortunately, it takes a huge fall, to see the slight light. But even the smallest amount of light seen, would go further than the deepest fall. (if that makes sense to you)

Finally, had it not been for all of that. I would've never found my way to here, I would've never came across Erin, which in turn wouldn't of likely lead me to the forums, which finally connected me to Rebecca.. & who knows where my life will lead me next. Be it great things or the hardest issues.. all I know is, I'm just constantly looking around the next corner, constantly wondering what'll be next in this life.
 
The way I see it is that life is a test. If you pass the test you go to heaven, if you don't you go to hell. To pass the test (IMO) you have to follow the teachings of Jesus, and stay true to the bible. If God created us all perfect, our stay on this planet would be pointless. There is no eveidence that there is a God, but that's where you're faith comes in. You have to believe tere is a higher power, you have to belive in God. IMO that's part of the test.

Agrex, I'm respectful of your beliefs, but I have to feel in my personal opinion to disagree with you slightly on them. You see, by what you're saying, you basically feel that only those who pass this "test" which isn't exactly known, that then & only then will you be accepted into Heaven, whereas everyone else will be cast into hell.

The question has to be, how can anyone pass a test, in which noone understands any of the questions, tasks, or responsibilities to this test. That in itself makes it seem like its more of a "game" played upon us, for some "higher beings" personal amusement. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong.. I'm just debating the situation through my own beliefs as well. I'm open to believing this to be true as well, just so you know.

Honestly, someone once told me that if you merely ask Jesus/God for forgiveness & to have them accepted into your life, & for them to forgive all the sins you've committed, that you'll be accepted into Heaven. However, my belief there is.. how can any one "sinful" person not just as easily commit several wrong deeds, only to say "please forgive me" & be accepted into Heaven?

I think its more a matter of, God doesn't judge any of us.. & upon going to Heaven, all the negative emotions. Greed, Envy, Lust, etc, etc... all of which will be wiped away & we merely won't be capable of being imperfect upon being in Heaven. (does that make sense?)

Also, I believe you partly at least, if not fully, pay for your sins here on Earth, here in life. Which could also explain why everything isn't "perfect." (the phrase "Hell on earth" comes to mind)

Each faith gives you you're own sle-confidence/self-belief. For example: Will gets his self-confidence from beliving in God, while you get yours by juts being a person. You may be a good person, but (IMO) that's only part of the test. Not being Christian does not make you a bad person.

Just to clearify on this situation, I found my renewed faith in God, because I came to the conclusion that it wasn't God that created the negative things in my life, & I came to the belief that it was merely what was destined to happen.

However, in that, I found self-confidence in myself as well. My faith & belief in God is one factor, but not the only thing that drives me. I drive myself, my love, passion & curiousity for life drives me forward.

People, don't tend to see the good in life, they tend to see the bad. That's why it's harder to see miracles happen. But (IMO) they are a part of everyday life. God loves us all, and if we love and trust him, we will be blessed with miracles.

I don't believe you could solidly say this to be a fact, more so than a mere opinion, or thought of. Because how easy would it be for any one person at this moment to say.. I want God in my life, & then follow that, only to not receive what "they" believe to be a "miracle." As a result, that would make what you said, wrong to them.

I agree that everyone sees more of the negative side of things than the bright side of things. For example, health is greatly unappreciated until its gone. Love, Family, even friends are vastly underrated until they're no longer around to show how much they were to you.

In my opinion, we are here on purpose. To pass the test of life.

The only thing I'll ask is, what is the ultimate test of life? How would all of us come to know fully what to do, or how to do it, without being given the "test paper," or answers up front? Some will never believe in the bible, that doesn't make them bad.. it just allows them to have a difference of opinion.

Ultimately, my belief in God also makes this possible.. for God doesn't ask, or demand that you obey, or follow in God's beliefs.. God gives you the ability to live free of choice, to make your own decision. Thats why I tend to lead away from true Christians, as the "die-hard" versions tend to think if you refuse to follow their teachings, their ways.. then you'll be cast into hell for all of eternity. I refuse to believe that, for I have strong belief if God is everything even the Christian's portray God as.. then they contradict themselves.
 
It's time to reply to another book. I've gathered all my energy: here we go!

In my belief, the reason God didn't creat everyone perfect, is because how can you learn whats right & wrong? How can you live for yourself, or think for yourself? The human condition is to make mistakes.. & then to learn from them.

Well, if God had created everyone perfect, there wouldn't be any need for them to learn right and wrong; they'd know it. They'd also not be tempted, so to speak. For a compassionate God, he seems awful quick to mark us for an eternity in the burning fires of pure misery.

I never really understood the idea of purgatory. Well, I got the basic idea but the way it's been explained to me it seems as if heavens full of gangsters and chavs. Well, in a thousand years maybe. There are different versions of it, and I know the current pope isn't keen on the idea.

Noone in life can say they haven't did one thing that was wrong, or something in which they had to decide a path. Noone can say that they didn't have an at least small thought on having to decide upon one thing or another. That is what humans, to me, are. We have free will, & complete control to make our own decisions. If God made us perfect, without flaw.. then we wouldn't likely be where we are today. Because (again, my theory) I'm sure we've made several mistakes, to find the ultimate path.

So do you subscribe to the theory that good is omnipotent, or not? If it's the former, then God merely could have made a perfect world for perfect humans with their perfect indestructible bodies to run around in. Free will creates misery for many, true happiness for very little, complete happiness for none; why would God want that? I'm not saying we should all live in a dictatorship, obviously. That's a different thing entirely.

Like I said, perhaps its more of a mindset that people who believe a religious power is watching over them, helps them to succeed more. Its a personal belief in themselves, its what each person has to get by. You said you feel you're a good person, & you're generally happy with yourself, without knowing it has anything to do with God.

Thats not a bad thing, thats your decision to make. Thats your belief to have. However, just like when a religious person believes some "higher being" to be watching over them.. its not to say its a lie. Whereas just like you say God has nothing to do with it, its also not to say its a lie. Its really a stale-mate of sorts, as neither side can conclusively prove the other wrong, without a shadow of a doubt.

Well, you can't really prove anything absolutely conclusively wrong, as things with massive amounts of evidence like - evolution - are still questioned and not just by the misinformed. However, an all-powerful, invisible being controlling the universe and where you go after you've shuffled off this mortal coil? Yup, that's a tough nut to crack, hence my "no evidence, no God" argument. I'm not saying there is no God, but I personally believe that the evidence available points very much away from it.


Its very true that if you look hard enough to see something, your mind will create the illusions for you. Just like for me, for example.. I guess if I believe no matter what I do, something will always go wrong in the time between Thanksgiving & the end of Jan.. that I'll always find a way to create that to come true.

However you can't discount that there have been rare occurrences that have happened, in which all logic escapes. If you ask me what, I'd really have to think to find them, but I'm sure I could. (this is where someone who knows the bible, or history in general would come in more handy)

Anybody noticed that miracles have gone down since the creation of the holy books? This is for one of two reasons, in my opinion: 1) God no longer sees our need to have so many "miracles" or 2) the miracles in the holy books were completely fabricated and that's why we haven't seen many miracles as of late. Then there's super secret number 3: people are merely a lot less believing than they were hundreds or thousands of years ago. As it is, many modern miracles can be explained. If not, then it just goes onto a big list. Logically, bees can't fly.

As far as pointing out everything good, claiming it to be a miracle, no, thats not what "I" would consider a miracle to be. Winning $20.00 off a lottery ticket, its a nice surprise.. not a miracle. Having your name drawn in a raffle, & winning a car.. again, its a great surprise.. not a miracle.

I see a miracle being something that is given to someone who doesn't "want" it, but instead "needs" it & simply can't get that on their own. Such as a mystical cure to something doctor's couldn't explain. A disease that randomly cured itself, which has happened.

I'd merely say that's something scientific. More specifically, something medical. Something, among many other things, that science hasn't been able to work out yet. We're still not entirely certain how the human ear or the human brain works, but we learn more and more as the years go by. What many people don't realize is that we're still discovering how everything works.


I think you're looking too hard at the negative things, to see all the positive things that balance it out though. Yes, crime rates are high, poverty & homeless situations are at outrageous numbers.. but that doesn't mean they out-weigh situations that balance.

You talk about rich getting richer, & poor getting poorer.. but do those rich people have the love of friendships, or solid family? Do they have the type of unity that poor people have? I highly doubt it. Because one of the negative sides of being rich, is you become greedy, & then untrusting. You never know who is true, & who is just after your money.

I do know a fairly rich family, or did. They seemed very happy, and their wealth seemed to make them only happier still, and I never witnessed any sort of argument between the family. Whereas my family was considerbly less well of when I was a child, and there were few members even in my immediate family who didn't fall out. To this day, my brothers still haven't properly made up. I was never "poor" so to speak, but I never had copious amounts of cash.

Personally, I'd love to be rich.. but I'd never wish to give up the feeling of true love for anything. And if it took living in a box, behind some rundown restaurant, eating trash.. as long as I had the true love of someone that made me happy to be alive, as long as I had my own happiness, its all I feel I'd need.

I'd prefer a big house and a media room, lol. But yea, I'm a cold, unloving bastard.

Well, like I said. I'm definately not discounting that it isn't true. I'm not discounting that when you die, you're simply dead. I don't know what life is. I don't understand what keeps us alive, breathing, seeing, speaking. I don't understand what keeps us driven. Does that make sense?

Electrical impulses coming from the brain. Those impulses stop coming, you're dead.

As a result, I don't know where we'll go upon passing away. I like to believe there could be a Heaven, or a chance to relive this life over, or go into another one for that matter.

As would I, I just don't see the likelihood of it.

I'm going to answer the rest of this later, once I've had about ten or so energy drinks.
 
I'm Catholic, but I'm a cafeteria catholic as I pick and chose what parts to believe in. I don't follow the waiting for marriage to have sex as the flesh is just too great.

I do however practive not using birth control as no condom sex is great.

I do follow some of the rules of Islam, as I'm a big Malcolm X Fan and have read a little bit on the teachings of the honorable Eljiah Muhammad and Louis Farakan.

I kind of do believe in god and I don't, but I do know I'm afraid of death s I'm not sure what is waiting for me as it would suck if I die and that's it, nothing.
 
I'm Atheist, but I have followed the Christian faith before. It's just I ended up losing the faith, because there were too many inconsistencies and inconceivable concepts/arguments that I couldn't take legitimately. I need substantial evidence or else I can't believe in a god as something more than fabrication. That's me though. Other people can believe what they want as long as they don't try to persuade me into something I've already rejected.
 
I'm not exactly religious per se, not by any organized religion standard, but I really think it's arrogant for us to want scientific proof of the existence of God. I'll give you proof - the Universe? Perhaps? Do you think Universes just pop the fuck up out of nowhere like "'Allo mate, fancy a cosmos?".

I'm not saying some Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist God is up there creating it, but come on people, there has to be something else out there. I mean, its the only explanation there is as to why the universe exists. There are things out there that we have no idea about people. For all we know there could be an alien society three thousand times as advanced as ours a couple of universes over from here. But we just don't know yet. Nor do I think we ever will.

Until we die. Then....well, then we know for sure. Unless of course you believe in reincarnation, in which case you wouldn't even realize all of the times you died.

...Yeah I drank too much coffee today obviously. I haven't posted this many times in monthes.
 
I'm not saying some Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist God is up there creating it, but come on people, there has to be something else out there. I mean, its the only explanation there is as to why the universe exists. There are things out there that we have no idea about people. For all we know there could be an alien society three thousand times as advanced as ours a couple of universes over from here. But we just don't know yet. Nor do I think we ever will.

The universe is quite expansive to dismiss all arguments. People can indeed consider possibilities if they have the need to. That much is true. But, since we don't have any real explanations to our existence other than theories, I'd say it's also as equally safe to say that we just don't know, which is as honest as it gets for non-believers such as myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: X
I'm Atheist, but I have followed the Christian faith before. It's just I ended up losing the faith, because there were too many inconsistencies and inconceivable concepts/arguments that I couldn't take legitimately. I need substantial evidence or else I can't believe in a god as something more than fabrication. That's me though. Other people can believe what they want as long as they don't try to persuade me into something I've already rejected.

I'm kind of the same way on viewing christain stories. I mean for all I have ask, no one has explained to me in good terms on how a virgin can get pregant. I know the majic in the story, but all my life I been told a sperm meets the egg. But 2008 years ago, god said let it happen.

I know there was a Jesus, no doubt that the man did exist, but a virgin can't get pregant, if that was the case, I know alot of girls who would used that excuse.
 
I'm not exactly religious per se, not by any organized religion standard, but I really think it's arrogant for us to want scientific proof of the existence of God. I'll give you proof - the Universe? Perhaps? Do you think Universes just pop the fuck up out of nowhere like "'Allo mate, fancy a cosmos?".

Well, yea. That's pretty much the big bang theory right there, hence my statement that everything happens by coincidence. Personally, I don't buy into the first cause theory. Again, existence itself is not proof of God. Not by a long shot. The way you state it, the Atheist point of view sounds ridiculous, but it's the most sensible. Space was small (really, really small) and it expanded, and continues to do so up until this day. Simple as. There's room for God, sure, but there's also room for a giant space ferret behind the scenes. Then again, I guess that'd just be "God" again. Not taking the piss, just making the comparison.

I'm not saying some Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist God is up there creating it, but come on people, there has to be something else out there. I mean, its the only explanation there is as to why the universe exists. There are things out there that we have no idea about people. For all we know there could be an alien society three thousand times as advanced as ours a couple of universes over from here. But we just don't know yet. Nor do I think we ever will.

I disagree that there has to be something out there. Well, you'd have specify what something is. Other civilizations? In all probability. But a God? Coincidence is much better explanation for why we exist, and it's perfectly feasible.

Until we die. Then....well, then we know for sure. Unless of course you believe in reincarnation, in which case you wouldn't even realize all of the times you died.

Not if we're, y'know, truly dead. As in, no afterlife, no reincarnation, just... nothing. Again, perfectly feasible. Discomforting, yes, but more feasible than an omnipotent being pulling the strings on everything.
 
Well, yea. That's pretty much the big bang theory right there, hence my statement that everything happens by coincidence. Personally, I don't buy into the first cause theory. Again, existence itself is not proof of God. Not by a long shot. The way you state it, the Atheist point of view sounds ridiculous, but it's the most sensible. Space was small (really, really small) and it expanded, and continues to do so up until this day. Simple as. There's room for God, sure, but there's also room for a giant space ferret behind the scenes. Then again, I guess that'd just be "God" again. Not taking the piss, just making the comparison.

The most sensible? How do you figure? On what grounds is the atheist perspective "most sensible"? I agree with you that existence in and of itself provides no sort of concrete "evidence" that God exists or existed. But for you to say that it is the "most sensible" without any kind of further explanation is rather presumptuous and undefended.


I disagree that there has to be something out there. Well, you'd have specify what something is. Other civilizations? In all probability. But a God? Coincidence is much better explanation for why we exist, and it's perfectly feasible.

There it is again. Coincidence is a "much better explanation." What does better mean? More logical? More reasonable scientifically? Makes you feel all good inside? Did that perspective help you win $20 on a bet? Why is it "better"?


Not if we're, y'know, truly dead. As in, no afterlife, no reincarnation, just... nothing. Again, perfectly feasible. Discomforting, yes, but more feasible than an omnipotent being pulling the strings on everything

Once more, how is it "more feasible"? I have no problem with you saying that it is "feasible." Frankly, everything is feasible. But you are not stating why you think that coincidental, purposeless existence trumps designed, purposeful existence. I am a Christian, and in no way do I want you to think I'm attacking your personal beliefs system. If I wanted to do that, I would have just responded with: "Go read Genesis 1 and 2, moron." So, my beef has nothing to do with Bible thumping. Rather, my issue is with the presentation of your argument that contains no elaboration or support.
 
Let's do this.

The most sensible? How do you figure? On what grounds is the atheist perspective "most sensible"? I agree with you that existence in and of itself provides no sort of concrete "evidence" that God exists or existed. But for you to say that it is the "most sensible" without any kind of further explanation is rather presumptuous and undefended.

A fair point, and something to which a counterpoint is difficult to explain. The universe is definitely expanding. We know this from the fact that the galaxies are drifting away from each other; the ones closer at slower speeds and the ones further away at quicker speeds. Is there an apparent cause for this, apart from the scientific - the uncaring and the unconscious? No, there isn't. Therefore, the most sensible thing to believe is the thing that there is most evidence for.

There it is again. Coincidence is a "much better explanation." What does better mean? More logical? More reasonable scientifically? Makes you feel all good inside? Did that perspective help you win $20 on a bet? Why is it "better"?

Again, there is more evidence, or merely... erm, how to say this. Not no evidence. It's not very good English, but it's the only sort of way I can explain it. It's more logical, more feasible. In those respects, it's better.


Once more, how is it "more feasible"? I have no problem with you saying that it is "feasible." Frankly, everything is feasible. But you are not stating why you think that coincidental, purposeless existence trumps designed, purposeful existence. I am a Christian, and in no way do I want you to think I'm attacking your personal beliefs system. If I wanted to do that, I would have just responded with: "Go read Genesis 1 and 2, moron." So, my beef has nothing to do with Bible thumping. Rather, my issue is with the presentation of your argument that contains no elaboration or support.

Again, a fair point. Seeing as everything is feasible, I used "more". The reason why it's more feasible? Again, evidence, or the solid lack thereof for an omnipotent being in the universe.
 
Let's do this.

Yessssss. I love a good debate. Especially one that is done with an open mind where the parties both are merely seeking a better understanding of truth, whatever that may be. I like how this has gone so far.



A fair point, and something to which a counterpoint is difficult to explain. The universe is definitely expanding. We know this from the fact that the galaxies are drifting away from each other; the ones closer at slower speeds and the ones further away at quicker speeds. Is there an apparent cause for this, apart from the scientific - the uncaring and the unconscious? No, there isn't. Therefore, the most sensible thing to believe is the thing that there is most evidence for.

I guess my issue with this line of reasoning is in the context of which you use "evidence" as a qualifier. What sort of "evidence"? And what is "evidence" for that matter? The fact that the universe is expanding does not turn the scales toward Coincidentalism. It really does not further either argument. Sure, that supports the Big Bang Theory, as the proposed explosion caused matter to fly into all different directions. Through inertia in a gravity-free environment, it is extremely logical to think that the universe is expanding due to the Big Bang. But that does not discount Creationism. It still does nothing to further the arguments that the heap of matter was either coincidental or purposeful.


Again, there is more evidence, or merely... erm, how to say this. Not no evidence. It's not very good English, but it's the only sort of way I can explain it. It's more logical, more feasible. In those respects, it's better.

Still, I do not see how it is more logical unless you are assuming that Creationism and science are at odds with one another. If you assume that either Darwin or the supernatural (only one or the other) are the only possible answers for the existence of....well, existence, then it would be difficult to see the value in both. I do not see this as a necessity to choose sides. I think that science and the supernatural are rather complementary to each other.

And still, we're back to evidence. What evidence? Scientific testing? Ok, fair enough. Here's a Bible and scholars' thoughts on Creationism and the liklihood of supernatural design. Basically, it's your word versus mine. You may say that science contains testing that produces statistics, thus making your sources more credible. But the Bible is the most read text in the history of the world, so I would go out on a limb and say it's pretty credible. And how do you know that the statistics are not false? I know they have to perform the tests many times in order to come to a publishable conclusion, but they could have made errors.


Again, a fair point. Seeing as everything is feasible, I used "more". The reason why it's more feasible? Again, evidence, or the solid lack thereof for an omnipotent being in the universe.


Again, I have no idea how you could say that there is not solid evidence of an omnipotent being in the universe, yet by saying that Coincidentalism is "more" feasible, you are assuming that there is solid evidence for Coincidentalism. And I don't understand how it can be used as "evidence" unless it dates back to before the Big Bang. Because that's where the universe as we know began. There was nothing before that, except for perhaps a divine being. And unless some light is shined on that point in time, it will be difficult of coming to substantial conclusions.
 
well let me start off by saying im muslim i dont go to the mosque much but i do go on important days my dad always says go when you feel like it my dad is a realy cool guy he lets me do practicly everything because he was raised in a strict religious family he doesnt want to put pressure on me to commit my life to my religion i do know i love being a muslim to outsiders things may be a little confusing but if you take the time wich most ppl dont do you can understand a lot about my religion i may be wrong but i think god will let people who arent muslim to heaven to just if they lead a good life and people who suffered so much this life i hate d*ckheads like terrorist who want to force our religion onto others it makes us look bad maybe when the time is right people will turn muslim and if you force them they will never bother just to look it up i mean i have an uncle who used to be a christian he was a major alcoholic but he turned into a muslim when he was 38 and for my mom after being married 5 years to my dead and having my sister she turned muslim to my dad doesnt force her to cover herself instead he just lets her do as she wishes when people think about muslim IMO they think about ppl who are extremists and who are complete psycho's i mean im a normal kid i play w.o.w finished high school play football lol basicly my point is if you dont believe in god just for the love of god stay on the right track! lol!!! :P
 
I guess my issue with this line of reasoning is in the context of which you use "evidence" as a qualifier. What sort of "evidence"? And what is "evidence" for that matter? The fact that the universe is expanding does not turn the scales toward Coincidentalism. It really does not further either argument. Sure, that supports the Big Bang Theory, as the proposed explosion caused matter to fly into all different directions. Through inertia in a gravity-free environment, it is extremely logical to think that the universe is expanding due to the Big Bang. But that does not discount Creationism. It still does nothing to further the arguments that the heap of matter was either coincidental or purposeful.

Personally, I look to Occam's razor: the simplest theory is best, when investigating a phenomenon few assumptions as possible should be made. To me, that is perfect logic. By suggesting that the big bang was purposeful, we are making many assumptions: that there is something out there with a cosmic agenda, that the wheels of fate were and are in motion, that our very existence was planned and we are part of some massive, divine plan. I don't think the argument for coincidence requires any assumptions: what happened doesn't appear to have a reason, therefore it is sensible to believe that it had no reason. Coincidence is the simplest explanation, the one where no further explanations need to be made. If there's no conclusive evidence of reason, which there isn't, then it means it happened by coincidence. The two are mutually exclusive. I think I said that right.

Still, I do not see how it is more logical unless you are assuming that Creationism and science are at odds with one another. If you assume that either Darwin or the supernatural (only one or the other) are the only possible answers for the existence of....well, existence, then it would be difficult to see the value in both. I do not see this as a necessity to choose sides. I think that science and the supernatural are rather complementary to each other
.

Science suggests likely theories, ones based on a series of logic and careful calculations, tests, etc. The supernatural (witches, ghosts, even God I suppose) are merely ideas pulled from people's brains, with little reason behind them. Someone suggested the idea of ghosts, and no conclusive evidence has been provided since. Darwin suggested evolution, and a massive, massive amount of evidence has since been shown to support it. As such, I believe that the two are not complementary; rather the contrary.

And still, we're back to evidence. What evidence? Scientific testing? Ok, fair enough. Here's a Bible and scholars' thoughts on Creationism and the liklihood of supernatural design. Basically, it's your word versus mine. You may say that science contains testing that produces statistics, thus making your sources more credible. But the Bible is the most read text in the history of the world, so I would go out on a limb and say it's pretty credible. And how do you know that the statistics are not false? I know they have to perform the tests many times in order to come to a publishable conclusion, but they could have made errors.

Errors would have been seen through. These theories are applied every day, and they work. You can see science at work in everything. Scientific theory has not only been tested, but the logic of Occam's razor, the likelihood of it, is also applied. If there's a large amount of evidence behind it, odds are it's correct. If there's no or a severe lack of evidence behind it, odds are it is incorrect. The Bible, on the other hand, is deconstructed on a daily, often for fun. Little children pose unanswerable questions. It's the old answer of "because" to the question you can't honestly answer. This is true to the degree that few Christians tend to suggest the Bible is meant to be taken literally any more. Rather, that it's meant to be some big poetic metaphor. I find either difficult to believe.

Again, I have no idea how you could say that there is not solid evidence of an omnipotent being in the universe, yet by saying that Coincidentalism is "more" feasible, you are assuming that there is solid evidence for Coincidentalism. And I don't understand how it can be used as "evidence" unless it dates back to before the Big Bang. Because that's where the universe as we know began. There was nothing before that, except for perhaps a divine being. And unless some light is shined on that point in time, it will be difficult of coming to substantial conclusions.

Is there evidence of something existing before the big bang besides a tiny pocket of matter that expanded? No. Therefore, it is sensible to make no assumptions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top