http://www.pwinsider.com/ViewArticle.php?id=30736&p=1
This is funny because...
Well, Wes, you were cloooose....
Is it time to give the belt back to Cena now?
Raw Rating for Big Wes
- Thread starter Slyfox696
- Start date
This is funny because...
Well, Wes, you were cloooose....
Is it time to give the belt back to Cena now?
That people tuned in to see the final moments of a match on Raw for the most prestigious title in the company? That people cared for a grand total of 3 minutes about HHH being champion?
That, despite being advertised from the start, and lasting for 30 minutes, the second hour of Raw only drew a 3.46?
Will be my new sig very VERY soon.
Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
buuuuut...they broke 4.0 for the title match?? with triple H in it?? I thought we said that champions draw??
No they didn't.
They broke a 4.0 for 3 minutes of a WWE title match. The other thirty minutes of the match did no better than a rough 3.7.
Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
and they were probably only THAT high becuase it was barnd new champ the night after the PPV. that and a bunch of people had seizures and passed out in front of their TVs afterthe greatness of the kennedy turn.
eh. its becuase he is feuding with a boring ass Orton, in a boring ass feudn with matches we have seen 1000000000000000000000000X before
eh. its becuase he is feuding with a boring ass Orton, in a boring ass feudn with matches we have seen 1000000000000000000000000X before
I disagree.
It's because of a lack of John Cena. Or Batista. Put Batista in the title picture, and ratings will jump to.
Alright, I'm coming out of the closet and will say this.
Ever since Cena has been out of the main event scene, I, Big Wes have lost interest in the title scene, PPV's and RAW TV show in quiet some time. Having built up by excitement for the day Cena dropped the title due to my strong disliking of his character, I was glued to my TV, every PPV and Monday. Hence why Cena drew me into watching, Now I could give 2 shits, because I couldn't give a flying fuck about anyone on the show other than Kennedy.
Sig it Sly.
Talk mess if you wish people. Had to get that off my e-chest.
Ever since Cena has been out of the main event scene, I, Big Wes have lost interest in the title scene, PPV's and RAW TV show in quiet some time. Having built up by excitement for the day Cena dropped the title due to my strong disliking of his character, I was glued to my TV, every PPV and Monday. Hence why Cena drew me into watching, Now I could give 2 shits, because I couldn't give a flying fuck about anyone on the show other than Kennedy.
Sig it Sly.
Talk mess if you wish people. Had to get that off my e-chest.
Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
sly have you read my column yet?? I think you would like it....
Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
nah, the backlash one. I give the reality on cena in there
Mighty NorCal
SHALL WE BEGIN?
...the only one ive done lol
Meh, don't durrrr me. Most people won't even admit that. Like all of those clowns in the LD.
Meh, it's possible.
ratings are NOT determined by one or two wrestlers gentlemen....its what I have been trying to say for a long long time. The WWE has to actually put a good show together with the entire cast if they want ratings. Cena cannot do it by himself. Batista cannot do it by himself. Triple-H cannot do it by himself. Even Kennedy cannot do it by himself. In order to get ratings, you have to put a good show with well built feuds and interesting twists and turns in the show. Thats a FACT! Plus shock value is very very important!
but before u rant and disagree with my points....take a look at them and realize that part of what I am saying is part of what u all believe...in order to have good show,
1. shock value
2. entartainment
3. strong wrestlers (by value Cena-HHH-Austin-Taker-Edge)
4. good Midcard-which WWE is on and off with like a bad relationship
5. good tag teams (non existent but theyre trying)
6. I would say good womens division but we havent had one for years so theres no point...
and before u bash me Sly, I have no problem with Cena, I think he is a good wrestler and I actually watch his matches....he does have more than 5 moves so Im not one of those type of posters...I got annoyed with his title reign I will admit but I would get annoyed by anyone holding the belt that long because heels are supposed to hold the belt for that long....at least thats how it usually went. I would give a face champ 6 months at most.
1. shock value
2. entartainment
3. strong wrestlers (by value Cena-HHH-Austin-Taker-Edge)
4. good Midcard-which WWE is on and off with like a bad relationship
5. good tag teams (non existent but theyre trying)
6. I would say good womens division but we havent had one for years so theres no point...
and before u bash me Sly, I have no problem with Cena, I think he is a good wrestler and I actually watch his matches....he does have more than 5 moves so Im not one of those type of posters...I got annoyed with his title reign I will admit but I would get annoyed by anyone holding the belt that long because heels are supposed to hold the belt for that long....at least thats how it usually went. I would give a face champ 6 months at most.