I thought this 4 questions were actually great ones so I will also try to give my opinions on the matter and hopefully get into a good wrestling debate:
1. Do dirt sheets and insider websites (such as Wrestlezone) enhance or ruin professional wrestling?
KB's says neither, I say both and it depends in what you want to read in fact. As much as you value your opinion, it's also great to read/hear other people opinions in life and about every thing, so wrestling is the same thing, and podcasts like CSR, or the reports in Bleacher Report is things that helps you get excited to an event, at least it works for me sometimes the way they put up things. However, they do have a downside, and that will depend like I said in what you want to read. Things like confirmed returns will kill the impact of said return, however teases that some worker may return in the future can put you both marking out because you waited for it, or just let down because you knew. I'm assuming that only IWC guys go to those websites, so I'm just talking about the way we see wrestling, because regular fans don't give a crap about WrestleZone really.
2. As an on-screen character, will Triple H ever become a better figurehead than Vince McMahon once was?
I don't know that, I can't predict the future as much as I would love to. We are talking about Triple H, one of the best superstars of all time, filled with talent and the thing we call charisma so there is always a chance that he can portray an awesome role like McMahon did in the last 15 years or so, and probably surpass him, but we don't know and in wrestling everything is possible from what we all saw to this day.
3. Is Vince McMahon a creative genius or an idea thief?
You gotta respect McMahon's way to see things. He grabbed a brand as WWWF and he turned that into a worldwide company know known as WWE, so his idea to bet on marketing and to go out and create bigger than life characters and to give people things like Flag on a Pole match between an USA hero and a Foreigner Villain changed the complex of wrestling. He is a genius just for the fact that WWE grew into the machine that it has become and it really doesn't matter if he stole the idea, because if he did he deserves respect for making it work for more than 25 years as THE wrestling company.
4. Are championship belts what defines greatness in wrestling?
Not always like KB's exemplified but it sure doesn't hurt them either. When a guy becomes a champion you gotta see that the fact that he did, was for a good reason. Even David Arquette, people to this day talk about it and he's still an avid wrestling fan so in the mids of a "war" Arquette gave people something to talk about, and in the end what defines greatness in wrestling, is what the fans respond to your accomplishments, if they talk about it, and it really doesn't matter if they say nice things or bad things, the fact that fans talk about it means that you've made an impact and created an highlight in wrestling history.
That was fun!
