If a wrestler has a hugely extensive move set and has the physique of a god, good for him so long as he's able to make me give a damn about seeing him do his thing. I get that Owens isn't gonna connect with everyone, nor will he connect with everyone on the same level because that's just how life itself works whether it comes to wrestling, football, basketball, certain genres of music or movies or whatever; personally though, I've seen FAR too many guys who have all these flashy moves and/or a strong look, but not too much of anything else. If a wrestler is unable to make me care about what he's doing, then I personally don't give a damn how athletic he is, how technically sound he is or if you can use his stomach as a cheese grater. There are a million mechanics and spot monkeys in pro wrestling, but if they can't make a connection with enough fans as far as their persona goes, then they're just another face in the crowd. Owens doesn't have the best cosmetic look and that's okay in my eyes as I've no interest in seeing him prance around in a Speedo like a bodybuilder or seeing him grace the cover of Muscle & Fitness magazine. If the guy's built really well, that's cool so long as he has what, in my opinion, are VASTLY more important traits to bring to the table.
Personally, I dig Owens' more soft spoken, cunning and calculating approach as it helps him stand out; you don't have to be some snarling, screaming, chest beating caveman to be an effective heel or, for that matter, a badass heel. Being more subtle can work just fine and is a refreshing change sometimes. Whereas Randy Orton is this more hot headed, impulsive sort of sociopath, Owens' character is the opposite in that he manipulates the situation to his liking before taking advantage; he's more of a thinking man's psycho but is just as vicious when it comes down to the crunch. I feel part of the problem some fans have today is that despite their claims of wanting diverse characters, few things could be further from the truth; whether a wrestler is a heel or babyface, those fans all seem to want them to portray the exact same sort of persona: some nigh invincible, take no guff from anyone, take all challenges straight on badass. If they don't get that from a babyface, they'll label him as lame or, ironically, one dimensional; if they don't get it from a heel, they label him as cowardly or too weak right from the start.
Nitpicking at the various sums & parts of a wrestler is a guaranteed way to find something you don't like about him or her, but a wrestler is supposed to be more than just the sum of his/her parts. EVERY wrestler has weaknesses and strengths, some are gonna be stronger in some aspects than others while weaker than others in other aspects. There are guys that I'm not all that fond of that some are still crazy about to this day; for instance, I'm not all that wild about Hulk Hogan. I'm not saying he doesn't deserve his legendary status because he does, nor am I disputing what he means to the business as I very much accept and agree with it. However, 99% of the time, I just never really cared for the guy's matches. There are no doubt some who feel that way about Flair, Savage, Austin, Taker, Rock, Rollins, Bryan, Ambrose, Cesaro and pretty much everyone else who's come along and will come along. The key is to look at the guy as a whole to see if there's enough there that interests you rather than picking out one or two things that you're not into, focusing on that and ignoring everything else.