Ongoing Thread For Smarmy Spam Responses to the WZT | Page 25 | WrestleZone Forums

Ongoing Thread For Smarmy Spam Responses to the WZT

I'd like to think I had something to do with that, but I'm just glad he pulled it out.
Weren't you pulling for Jericho over RVD in 2009?

Of all the people who shouldn't go over Van Dam, Jericho is at the top of that list.
 
That Undertaker vs. Bret match should be interesting. I'm looking forward to people finding a way around Undertaker literally never pinning Bret on TV.
 
The whole, "xxx is a bigger star then xxx so he should win," argument ruins this tournament for me. I mean people love to throw that out there. Should we just alternate wins between Austin and Hogan every year?

IC has made a great argument for Vader, however, some people are completely dismissing the argument and the stipulation because Austin was a bigger draw.

That makes the tournament useless.

People like you, who cant understand very simple things, make the tournament useless. You all wonder why I talk to people like they stupid.

THE DRAWING ASPECT IS A FUCKING COMPONENT...NOT THE WHOLE THING....A COMPONENT....DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE FUCK COMPONENT MEANS? HULK HOGAN HAS NEVER EVEN WON. BRET HART, UNDERTAKER AND SHAWN MICHEALS, WHO ARE SHIT DRAWS, HAVE WON. THIS IS BECAUSE DRAWING IS JUST A FUCKING COMPONENT TO FACTOR IN WHEN VOTING.

Jesus fuckin CHRIIIISSSTTT what is so GOD DAMN difficult to understand for people ???? WHAT, fucking tell me, is so FUCKING COMPLEX about this?!?!


SHIT!!
 
People like you, who cant understand very simple things, make the tournament useless. You all wonder why I talk to people like they stupid.

THE DRAWING ASPECT IS A FUCKING COMPONENT...NOT THE WHOLE THING....A COMPONENT....DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE FUCK COMPONENT MEANS? HULK HOGAN HAS NEVER EVEN WON. BRET HART, UNDERTAKER AND SHAWN MICHEALS, WHO ARE SHIT DRAWS, HAVE WON. THIS IS BECAUSE DRAWING IS JUST A FUCKING COMPONENT TO FACTOR IN WHEN VOTING.

Jesus fuckin CHRIIIISSSTTT what is so GOD DAMN difficult to understand for people ???? WHAT, fucking tell me, is so FUCKING COMPLEX about this?!?!


SHIT!!
And then the computer hit the wall.
 
That Undertaker vs. Bret match should be interesting. I'm looking forward to people finding a way around Undertaker literally never pinning Bret on TV.

Has Hart ever pinned the Undertaker without the help of a Shawn Michaels' chair to the face?

*Holy shit, they've wrestled 72 times.
 
People like you, who cant understand very simple things, make the tournament useless. You all wonder why I talk to people like they stupid.

THE DRAWING ASPECT IS A FUCKING COMPONENT...NOT THE WHOLE THING....A COMPONENT....DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE FUCK COMPONENT MEANS? HULK HOGAN HAS NEVER EVEN WON. BRET HART, UNDERTAKER AND SHAWN MICHEALS, WHO ARE SHIT DRAWS, HAVE WON. THIS IS BECAUSE DRAWING IS JUST A FUCKING COMPONENT TO FACTOR IN WHEN VOTING.

Jesus fuckin CHRIIIISSSTTT what is so GOD DAMN difficult to understand for people ???? WHAT, fucking tell me, is so FUCKING COMPLEX about this?!?!


SHIT!!

You misunderstand me.

I never said that drawing power wasn't a factor or a component, as you so eloquently put. I was simply referring to the people that make drawing power their entire fucking argument and they completely dismiss kayfabe or the stipulation in the gimmick matches.

Austin was never booked as Superman. Sure he was the top draw, however, he lost plenty of matches to opponents that he should have never lost to when the match suited them. People like Mick Foley and Vince McMahon come to mind.

Why can't Vader beat him? Oh right, because he was the top draw and Vader wasn't.
 
You misunderstand me.

I never said that drawing power wasn't a factor or a component, as you so eloquently put. I was simply referring to the people that make drawing power their entire fucking argument and they completely dismiss kayfabe or the stipulation in the gimmick matches.



Why can't Vader beat him? Oh right, because he was the top draw and Vader wasn't.

They also, are morons, who dont understand very simple concepts.

Vader cant beat him because his imagined match advantage does not outwiegh how much Austin eclipses him as a draw and overall impact.
 
You misunderstand me.

I never said that drawing power wasn't a factor or a component, as you so eloquently put. I was simply referring to the people that make drawing power their entire fucking argument and they completely dismiss kayfabe or the stipulation in the gimmick matches.

Austin was never booked as Superman. Sure he was the top draw, however, he lost plenty of matches to opponents that he should have never lost to when the match suited them. People like Mick Foley and Vince McMahon come to mind.

Why can't Vader beat him? Oh right, because he was the top draw and Vader wasn't.

I hope you realize you are destroying the only argument you can use for Undi in the next round.
 
I hope you realize you are destroying the only argument you can use for Undi in the next round.

Overall, 'Taker was a larger draw then Bret, but that's not the only thing in 'Taker's favor.

Also, I can't remember a time that Bret went over 'Taker clean without someone getting involved.

'Taker has had Bret dead to rights more than one time.
 
Overall, 'Taker was a larger draw then Bret, but that's not the only thing in 'Taker's favor.

Also, I can't remember a time that Bret went over 'Taker clean without someone getting involved.

'Taker has had Bret dead to rights more than one time.

I can't remember a time Undi went over Bret, period.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top