Goes to show how much you know. They had issues BEFORE he joined.
Doesn't it seem pointless that Anderson joins Immortal though(which they desperately needed) just to have him fued with members already?
Solid Wrestling is for FREE TV. Quality wrestling is for PAY PER VIEW. Get with the fucking program. You all wonder why WWE has low buyrates?
I know that, but the fact is that TNA simply didn't put any good solid wrestling on tonight(aside from the cage match before how it ended). WWE PPVs have lower buyrates becuase of how much they cost today, the fact that there's illegal streaming, and the fact that there are too many of them, but that doesn't mean they aren't good.
Pointless? Advancing feuds and angles is pointless now?
Sting's backstage segments were outstanding. Knockouts building towards a match...Totally pointless. Eric Young bringing comedy which is usually golden...Totally pointless.
So Sting literally pretending that he has power for 2 hours was building a storyline? Knockouts fued is pointless because the story is flat out idiotic because it flat out isn't believable. EY is fine with his comedy, but if they're going to use him for comedy then why make him TV Champion?
More like the past 2 months.
Pretty much what I said when the past few weeks.
You know someone doesn't have intellgiences when they compare SmackDown to Impact.
WWE has RAW and SmackDown. TNA has Impact Wrestling...ONE 2 hour show. Not Two. ONE.
So what am I supposed to pick and choose what I compare TNA to now? If I were to compare it to Raw only or SmackDown only that's like saying the other brand isn't worth the comparison, which it most certainly is.
No shit, SmackDown will have longer matches.
Which is because it's the better wrestling filled program.
Bullshit. Your sounding like a blind mark now. Destination X and MITB were EQUALLY good.
Aries vs. Low Ki vs. Ion vs. Evans and Punk vs. Cena were both MOTY contenders.
No they weren't in both cases. MITB was better because it had better matches which advanced storylines while Destination X was a one-off show that was built around revising the X-Division(which hasn't really taken effect yet). The 4 Way was good, but it was a spotfest, and what multiman spotfest isn't good? Meanwhile Cena vs Punk had emotion, told a great story, and was a good wrestling match rather than just a bunch of cool flips and dives.
Da Bishoff and Hogun ruined da tna lulz!
Your entire post is translation: "I'm a WWE mark and I'll downgrade shit for no reason and no explanation and make WWE look great despite the fact everyone knows 2010 wasn't a great year besides June."
Yeah I'm a bit of a WWE mark, because that's what I find entertaining. I was a TNA mark too before Hogan and Bischoff came in, because the fact is had 2010 was one of TNA's worst years in a long time because that's all the main storylines revolved around and they still do, almost 20 months later. I'm downgrading TNA because they deserve it after the absolute crap they put out last night, which really is a shame because the past few weeks they really had their shit together.
You say
everyone as if you asked every wrestling fan alive what they thought of 2010. In 2010 we got fueds like Cena vs Batista, Jericho vs Edge, Bret Hart vs Mr. McMahon, Triple H vs Sheamus, CM Punk & The SES, plus a ton more, all of which happened before June when Nexus debuted, and even after that we had Nexus, Miz's rise to the top, and SO much more, from both brands