The whole "Wrestling Matters" campaign was a blantant obvious attempt to try and bash WWE on rebranding, it was all to get back to at WWE for rebranding, that's it. All the video's, and the interviews, the new set, everything, all becuase WWE rebranded. Becuase, for some strange reason, alot of people (including TNA) thought that WWE rebranding from World Wrestling Entertainment to "WWE," they were going to stop the actual wrestling in-ring product, you know the most important part of WWE, where all the storylines end up, and some begin. It's sad to think that some idiot in Orlando, Florida saw "WWE Rebranding," and thought "hey, WWE's rebranding, we have to rebound by saying "Wrestling Matters."
You bitch too much, period. How old are you anyway? If you're under the age of 18 I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and a free pass, but if you've been a wrestling fan for as long as most people on these forums have, I'm just going to shake my head. Yes, I am very well aware of TNA's flaws, the "Wrestling Matters" thing yeah it was a stunt, like most of these things are, but so what? Bottom line is that most of what professional wrestling relies on is theatrics, the only thing is that at least when the WWE was still the WWF and a few years after the name change, they would still interchange the terms pro wrestler, professional wrestling and any variations thereof with the term sports entertainment. And there used to be a lot of flexibility with the media on them calling it such, nowadays you'll have publicists for the company telling the media what to refer to their wrestlers as and what to call the art form itself:
The Language of WWE...click here for more.
Yes, I know there's a lot of talk and ridiculous backstage segments in TNA, (WWE is not innocent of this either) but at least TNA isn't ashamed to call themselves a professional wrestling company, even if their product by comparison to WWE is not as well marketed or managed as well. WWE on the other hand while I can appreciate their desire to want to continue their outside ventures like film production and what not have the stupidest rationale in my opinion of how they want their product to be looked at. Sorry, wrestling is not a dirty word, nor should it be treated like one. Again, just go to that link and you'll see that all for yourself. And even though I initially doubted the authenticity of that article, I've seen, read and listened to enough interviews to know that WWE definitely doesn't want you to think of "wrestling" when their name comes up. Diversifying yourself is fine, no problem there I can understand entertainment companies wanting to do such, but that's why other companies like Disney have off-shoots/subsidiaries i.e. Dimension Films, Marvel Comics, etc. If WWE was so insistent on wanting to be so diverse I would think and I could be wrong but in my view they should create subsidiaries that don't share the same name as their wrestling company if they REALLY want to be taken seriously as an entertainment empire.
Getting back to TNA and your umpteenth post whining about them itssoeasy123, there is more to a company's fortunes than just ratings and other than the personnel similarities, TNA lacks one thing that WCW had always had even in their poorest years and that was being an established brand. For those marks that thing WCW only dated back to the 80s forget how the 50 plus years that the Crockett Family promoted wrestling in that area of the country is the reason why there was a WCW in the first place. TNA started from scratch and despite the signing of WWE talent, the fact that they have endured for nearly a decade where failed promotions like Drew McManus's WWA and Jimmy Hart's XWF should say something about them. They might not be doing everything right according to some of the "sticklers" like yourself, but you name me one other company that's lasted long enough to even be close to a competitor to WWE since WCW was bought out by them when they were still the WWF. I bet you can't, and ROH despite how much I like their product isn't quite there yet, that could change though with their future plans, I'll say that much.
It's the same as Kentucky Fried Chicken rebranding to KFC, and Dennys starts calling themselves "Texas Fried Chicken and saying "Chicken Matters." WWE rebranding only becuase they are more than a wrestling company, which in fact they are, but they still have actual wreslting in the product, it's not like they replaced the ring with a dance floor, and have a PPV called "Talk it Out" with Dr. Phil, to fix all the problems rivals have. It's still a wrestling company, they just have much more outlets than just their in-ring product to showcase and promote WWE.
The Denny's-KFC comparison is ridiculous one relies on heavy drive thru business with some dine-in service and the other does the exact opposite, I can't even believe I am going to dignify this one, but I will albeit briefly. And believe it or not some KFC locations still have the words Kentucky Fried Chicken on their storefronts and we are talking about renovated and up to date locations too. Again, like I said in my previous paragraph, if WWE wants to be more than a wrestling company creating a non-wrestling brand would be a VERY good idea, in my opinion the WWE logo on movie posters scares away non-wrestling fans, and I'll even so bold as to say that they are the TNA of Hollywood, they're still relatively new to the movie making game just like TNA in all honesty is still new to wrestling even though they have been around for almost a decade and have veteran talent. However, I would reckon that if WWE created a name for their film studio that is removed from the WWE name, it could help how non-wrestling fans might look at the movie division of their company.
Then after that doesn't help the ratings, and CM Punk starts to get really popular, they have on their webiste, front page, "CM PUNK IS COMING TO TNA ON DEMAND!" Yep, one again TNA trying to cash on WWE. Thier basically showcasing a superstar who they didn't push, got hugely over in ROH and WWE, and is in line to be the #2 guy in WWE. Of course there the TNA apologist that arel ike "it's a good business decision," yeah, it is, TNA is also lucky they have footage of him. I guess if Hogan, Angle, Flair, Steiner, Jeff Hardy, Jarret, ever go back to WWE, or Samoa Joe goes to WWE, there be "(insert wrestler) IS COMING TO TNA ON DEMAND!"
You have to be about the most annoying fool on this forum, big whoop TNA advertised a former roster member being showcased on their On Demand Archives. Mind you, they are breaking no laws by highlighting them in footage they own. You truly are a stupid moron, even if it's for a short term sales spike in their on demand service, it's their prerogative to do that, whether I agree with their business or practices or not is irrelevant, but this just shows how weak a leg you have to stand on if you're going to use this as another reason to complain about TNA, you're a complete moron. Case closed. And yes if the above alumnus ever did return to WWE and TNA did the same thing with them then that's ok too, after all WWEGreatestMatches.Com has plenty of archive footage with former WWE roster members that work elsewhere now, does that mean those archives should be erased too and not advertised in any way, shape or form?
They have the biggest wrestler in the history of wrestling, and alot of legends and big names, but they still can't pop a 2.0 rating. TNA will always try to "one up," WWE, and take pot-shots at "the company up North." You would think after the failed Monday Night Wars earlier last year, they would try and estabilish their own brand, but their still taking petty schoolyard pot-shots and obvious jabs at WWE, only to feel better.
TNA is not the first nor the last promotion to speak ill of the competition, go back to 1996 and see how pathetic the mid-late 90s WWF was with jabbing at WCW every chance it had. Sure, WCW did it too but Vince decided to do the same things, in fact Vince is probably the worst example of schoolyard pettiness considering that besides making fun of Hogan and Macho Man's age (which in itself is no big deal, who gives a shit really, those skits were gold, I enjoyed them) but he also spared no expense to remind people of Ted Turner's dirty laundry and controversial moments of his career as a media mogul.
I couldn't even begin to guess how much sand would be in your clit if TNA ever makes fun of Vince's XFL (and people like you scoff at a business woman like Dixie Carter investing in a wrestling company, when Vince himself could only keep a football league open for one season) going out of business or any of if they brought up his steroid scandal and sex abuse controversy. Seriously itssoeasy123 your double standards never cease to amaze or amuse me. You partisan fans seriously are idiots. Despite the annoyance of TNA's WWE jabs, I've never EVER seen them actually air Vince's dirty laundry out on the air and use their program to attack him personally, and when I mean personally just mentioning WWE is not the same as highlighting the man's public embarrassments. Say all you want about TNA, but they never have gone the Billionaire Ted route to the best of my knowledge. And yes WCW giving away taped results is not in the same league as the Billionaire Ted stuff.
Again, before you even bother to post again do your damn homework because your bitching fest plots have more holes in them than a slice of swiss cheese. Please, spare me.