Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Man, Wrestlemania matches against the Undertaker are reserved for Established Strong Characters NOT newbies such as the likes of Wade Barret. Don't get me wrong, Wade is coming along well, but still, Do you realize that anyone who beats The Undertaker at Wrestlemania will have such a CATAPULT in his career! There are plenty of others I could think of to give that to instead of a newbie as Wade Barret.
PISS POOR MOVE for Creative to do in my opinion, and I believe it is a strong well proven pointed opinion too.
I hear what you're saying, but let me first assure you (as another guy before me has) if Wade wrestles Taker at 27, he will not win.
Furthermore, I don't think 'Taker's WM matches should be even considered "reserved" as such for established stars. Not in the least. Yeah, sure, it's great to go into a long-anticipated match with the Undertaker and another strong character, but my God, if you want to talk about a real boost for somebody's career, saying that you were beaten by the Undertaker at WrestleMania is pretty impressive in itself. I'd say that the Undertaker beating anybody at WrestleMania is much more beneficial for the looser rather than the Undertaker. Sounds strange, I know, but think about it.
With that, how anti-climactic would it honestly be to have 'Taker's streak end? Nobody wins in reality. If somebody ever does, they are most likely not going to be of good-enough caliber. They'll get a sparkly little gold star next to their name that says: "I beat the Undertaker at WrestleMania" - but they have effectively just shit on the monumental matches between Taker and HBK or Edge and all the other folks he has beaten, such as Flair and Triple-H.
If Triple-H didn't do it at 17 and Michaels didn't do it in either of their exchanges, then it will forever be a bad investment for the WWE to have Undertaker loose at Mania... much less against Wade Barrett.
Like I said, the best rub that anybody can really get from the situation is to loose to the Deadman at Mania - especially rookies. Now that to me is a much safer, more effective and beneficial long-term than winning against him at Mania.
Lastly, I personally hope Wade doesn't face Taker at Mania. I am not a Wade Barrett fan and I have disliked him ever since I first watched NXT. I'm not going to say that he sucks and he's terrible and can't wrestle - I don't believe that he'd be getting where he is if he honestly didn't have a future. I just don't like him.
Also, Barrett/Taker is a possible back-up plan at this point. Let's not get too carried away with the idea I suppose. If WWE can wrap up Lesnar - then I'm all for Lesnar/Taker at WrestleMania!
People are taking Undertaker's Streak to be some bull shit stepping stone for "Miz" or "Barret", his Streak IS bigger than all his title reigns combined and it is of much significance. As Ace rightfully pointed out Undertaker has beaten people of insanely high calibre, and the only one left out of today's roster is probably Cena himself.
McMahon isn't some stupid crack pot who would put Miz vs Undertaker and hope for a million buys *as he is doing (the hoping for mill buys... ¬.¬)*, yes it seems Miz is WWE's next big thing but is he ready to go toe to toe with arguably McMahon's biggest creation? No. The Streak is currently worth more to all superstars than the WWE/WHC titles, it just shows how important it is.
Another point Ace made was about CM Punk not having chemistry with 'Taker, and he is totally right. CM Punk does not have chemistry with 'Taker, it's a bit like Edge & Kane currently. Anyways, Punk seems to have more things going for him and he doesn't need to face 'Taker for his Streak (same goes for Miz, Barret, Sheamus and the rest... might aswell add Zach Rhyder seeing as someone is bound to add his name to the list vs 'Taker).
Right now Lesnar and Cena are the best bets...
Im from england and i am a massive wade barret hater, he is so boring, with a finishing move that does fuck all.
My initial feelings toward this news was disappointment, because you want that epic match up between Taker and his opponent at Mania and Barrett isn't at the moment big enough for such a huge match, IMHO. Whenever reports came out that WWE was already scripting out Taker's opponent for Mania, the two guys that I didn't want to see the most were Sheamus and Kane; Sheamus because I dislike the guy immensely and Kane because it's been done to death (for the record, I dislike Sheamus because his matches are boring and slow and his "king's" wardrobe is just silly looking).
I don't hate the idea of Barrett v Taker...I'm just a little disappointed by it. Taker needs to fight someone who's been around the block, has worked for years to earn the honor, and maybe has been a proven champion, at one point. We've seen him fight guys who were just hot at the time and it turned out to be a weak point in the streak's integrity. I don't feel like Barrett has been around long enough to prove himself worthy of the honors, is all. Don't get me wrong, I'm not dogging on Barrett, but the guy hasn't even been in the WWE for a full year, now. You might as well have him fight Alberto Del Rio. I mean, I know Barrett has done a lot more than Rio, so far, but it just doesn't have that big fight atmosphere like we've gotten used to within the past few years.
Truth be told, I was holding out for a CM Punk v Taker match. It too has been done to death and the two didn't have the best chemistry when they did feud, but I was thinking that maybe the Nexus angle could spice it up a little bit more. Honestly, I think I'd rather see Taker and Edge have another title match. I've said before that I know I'm not going to get my Edge v Christian match like I've been dreaming of, so you might as well. The two put on a great match at WMXXIV, and I could get excited about the rematch. I know that it doesn't make any sense because Taker has to resolve his issues with Barrett and Nexus, but it's a long way till April and I don't know how much heat Barrett will garner without the Nexus gimmick.
Again, feel free to disagree, this is just what I would like to see. I won't pout about a Barrett v Taker match, but I will just be somewhat disappointed.
I'm not hating on Barrett if he gets this match. They need to establish future superstars and Barrett is a perfect fit. Barrett attacking the big show is establishing as a major player if he beats the big show, then kane it will establish him ready to face the Undertaker. I'm not saying it's going to be a shawn vs undertaker type of match cause i doubt anyone can do a match as good but it will be a decent match.
There's no doubt, that the hype is there for the buildup to the WM Match seeing that Nexus caused Taker his Buried Alive Match against Kane. But To be honest with you, Barrett is not Wrestlemania Worthy to face the Deadman. Now a regular Pay-Per-View, Yes. Cause right now Barrett is young in his career, and this is his first Wrestlemania, and how will he deliver at the Superbowl of all Wrestling Events? It's a toss up. The WWE already thinking bout taking a risk with the Miz vs. Cena Match for the Championship with Miz Main Eventing as Champion for the first time. And quite honestly Cena matches doesn't sell well either. But Taker's Match doesn't needs to be a risk. I wouldn't mind seeing Taker and Shaemus though.