I'm not sure if Jeff is even signed to a extension, he could be sitting out his contract actually. Go look at his Youtube videos, nothing about him says "I want to wrestle again"
Like I said before, TNA should just build the talent they have and I think they are just doing that. Rebuilding Joe, building Crimson, Gunner, Roode and Anderson. Forget about Jeff at this point.
I though Jeff in TNA could've brought some ratings, or viewers for the company, becuase he was so over. But, they did nothing with him for 5 months, so that didn't happen. Also, with his drug courtcase, it was kind of stupid for TNA to sign such a person.
He was signed before he got arrested or he was in a verbal agreement. You can only question them putting on TV.
The reason why fans tune out, is becuase TNA brings nothing to the table that makes you want more.
Umm plenty of people disagree with that.
TNA's ratings and viewers say that much, that fans will watch one week, than won't the next.
You continue to ignore the fact, WWE fans will not watch anything outside the company. That has a huge effect.
All company ratings are inconsistent. Don't pretend like both WWE and TNA don't get inconsistent ratings.
Not really strange considering atleast one superstar turns heel every 3 weeks.
Really? Lol
It's hard to get invested into a superstar, or storyline, when 5 people are face one day, than heel in a month.
Really? Kurt Angle was a face for 2 years. Anderson was a face for 1 year. He turned TWEENER not heel. He never pulled any heelish tactics besides joining Immortal.
How can anyone talk about face/heel turns when CM Punk has been face/heel for the last month. It happens. It's wrestling. Certain guys are natural in-betweeners and Anderson/Angle are those two. Nobody else.
Sting has been a face forever.
It has nothing to do with WWE fans, but more with TNA's product.
In America? No. If that theory was correct, TNA wouldn't be huge overseas and in other markets like Mexico.
Fans tuned in to see Jeff heel, after the watched it for a few weeks, they went back to their usually thing. One interesting thing happened in TNA, but after three weeks that one interesting thing becomes boring.
Says who? People who make it that way. I remember the entire beginning of the angle and none of it was boring. Reaction made the show alot better. If anything, the 2nd show after BFG was boring.
TNA is'nt even that big of a known company.
Spike TV would do that to anyone.
Alot of times guys like Kevin Nash would be in airport's and fans would walk up to them and say "hey, are you retired, where have you been the last few years?"
Casuals. Those are casual fans.
It's TNA's own fault their not competiting with WWE
Aren't you the one to complain they compete with WWE instead of focusing on their own product? Wow
and their own fault their ratings are low.
1.6 million viewers. Largest audience on Spike TV every week is their fault...Okay.
WWE fans have nothing to do with it, maybe if TNA put out a product that was interesting, it would be bigger.
Oh fucking please. The product right now is interesting but people find ways to make it difficult for their own taste. That's the damn problem.
SummerSlam has overbooking but it's awesome. TNA pulls a minor swerve with Angle hitting Sting with a chair and it's criticized. I mean come on now.
People find ways to hate the company or anything they do. The X-Division is reborn, Knockout Division has gotten back to it's roots, pushing new talent. Why the hell is that not considered interesting?
Plus, one again you mention Bret Hart winning the US Championship. Well, he didn't hold it for two months, did he? No, won it that night, forfieted it that night.
It does not matter. He pinned Miz. Period. If this was another scenario, it would be blown out of proportion.
It's not like he returned and won the WWE Championship 2 times.
I know you love WWE and all but do not deny that. He pinned someone, Miz didn't go over on him.
His time is up, he knows it. Also, Bret vs. Vince wasn't even close to decent in match wise but it needed to be done. It was done to end the Mr. McMahon character, and to end the 12 year rivalry these two had from Montreal '97. It was a mess of a match, but it had to be done.
Funny, It had to be done but you complain about Hogan/Sting or Flair/Sting when it has to be done. Or else, all of them being in the company at the sametime would be a waste.
Just saying.
You mention a "shoot interview," Austin Aries had, and compare it to CM Punk's. First of all, Punk's was done on a much larger scale, and on free television. It's was'nt a shoot interview, it was a rant. And besides, shoot interview don't happen often it WWE, TNA shoot interviews go around like air.
Umm. No. TNA started doing shoot promos last year since the Immortal angle. It's not consistently either.
Larger scale or not, It does not matter. It was done by TNA previously back in 2010. Of course, WWE doesn't do it but overreacting by calling it a new era?
Well, Kevin Nash will probably be wrestling CM Punk, and I'm not at all happy about that. As a onscreen character, sure he's entertaining, but in the ring he's as broken as Undertaker. One big boot, and his knee's could be broken again.
So, WWE is a retirement home? Kevin Nash, Undertaker, Big Show, Kane...I'm just kidding.
You may not like Nash wrestling but there is plenty of people who want to see it. Which goes into what I'm saying with the natural double standard.
the TNA apologist who will praise anything TNA does.
Um No. I didn't really like this past week's show despite a few things. I don't really like the Mexican storyline despite where I know what will happen.
I didn't like alot from 2010. I love what they did because they rebranded, made an effort to change their approach in many areas and they are pushing and creating different brands and styles. Signing young guys, getting behind homegrown guys. Which is what everyone wants right?
Crimson, Gunner, Robert Roode. Alex Shelly and Magnus competing for a potential World or X-Division title shot.
New X-Division talent, bring back the old Knockouts. Verity in PPVs, making Sting interesting, making Kurt interesting (Finally).
For the record, I was a huge WWE fan since I found wrestling and got into wrestling. Everything from 2005-2009 was unbelievable to me. TNA, I found out about back in 2007 and I hated it. I gave it a chance and when WWE changed, TNA grewo n me. I'm no blind mark because I dislike the way WWE is and the hypocrites fans are towards them. Plenty of wrestlers feel the same, hell even Batista isn't a fan of WWE anymore.
but I rarely see any TNA fan bash anything TNA does.
I'd show you some proof, this is false.
But, if a WWE fan says one thing wrong about a TNA storyline, or superstar, the TNA fans come out like hawks with the usual "your a WWE fanboy, if you don't like it don't watch it."
Not at all. TNA fans have a problem with the HYPOCRISY. TNA is getting criticized for firing Matt Hardy...When they were criticized for hiring Matt Hardy. Things like that are what piss off fans. Everyone has their own opinion.
If somebody wants bash WWE, I'll happily debate and counter their points, but TNA fans will say "your a WWE fanboy," and run away from having a real debate.
And, WWE fans don't bash people that like TNA who criticize WWE? I can throw names out if you want.
Since, you know so much. I love Mark Henry right now, brings me warm memories of that run he had back in 2005 against Kurt Angle on SmackDown.
CM Punk's promos are great. R-Truth's gimmick is sad but still entertaining. I'm intrigued by Randy Orton...What the fuck is his gimmick anyhow?
But I find it hard to believe or to like WWE when John Cena gets 1,000 title shots. He just lost a FAKE title but he gets a title shot when Punk held the REAL WWE title and he gets Kevin Nash? Booking like that would be called "Russorific" among other jokes. It's a double standard that turns people off from WWE. The product is dead beyond main event storylines.
There is nothing keeping you from caring about Rhodes, Jackson, Ziggler, Riley, etc. Then, fans brag about this "Youth Movement"...Jack Swagger went from Champ to Jobber. Sheamus went from solid main eventer to I have no idea. Barret is the same.
There is no consistency with WWE's pushes and EVERYTHING goes right back to Orton/Cena which is predictable.
Now, you understand the logic and thinking of a wrestling fan towards WWE and TNA.