Too many times, bookers/promoters put performers in awkward situations to see how much they’ll take. To see how far a wrestler will go in the name of company loyalty or, more, accurately, to keep his/her job.
That’s clearly what’s happening to Jerry Lawler.
Keeping his feud with Michael Cole going long after interest had died down is one thing. Frequently invoking the relatively recent death of his mother is quite another.
If I’m Lawler, I don’t do it. It doesn’t matter if Lawler is “OK with it.” Lawler shouldn’t be asked to do it, period. Some things matter more than a friggin’ wrestling angle, or the greater glory of WWE. It’s not like the mention of Lawler’s mother sells one extra ticket or PPV.
This feud died once Cole wrestled. Once we saw Cole’s total lack of athleticism, that was the death knell. Plus, the citizens seem to have cooled on his character. Cole came out of the gate strong. But now it’s same old, same old.
You’ve got to watch for collateral damage, too. Spending too much time in a feud between two announcers isn’t doing anything positive for Jack Swagger.
WWE should have Natalya referee a match between Lawler and Cole. It would be the first-ever Nat King Cole match. I’m pretty sure I stole that from somewhere.
WHO’S THE LITTLE KID WITH P.S.?
Michael Hayes managing Tyson Kidd is a good idea…in theory. Kidd can’t talk; Hayes can. Kidd is inexperienced; Hayes is a legend. Kidd can work; Hayes can help refine that.
But once you see them together, it’s a joke. Hayes is too much bigger than Kidd. It looks like Hayes is taking his son to the playground. (They got playgrounds on Bad Street?) The last thing a manager should do is make his protégé look minuscule and less dangerous. Guilty on both counts.
Remember when DDMe managed Badd Company in the AWA? DDMe used to TOWER over Diamond and Tanaka. It looked SILLY, i.e., provided the template for DDMe’s career.
Anyway, Kidd needs more than a manager. He needs to be in a tag team, too. Vince would have to go REALLY old-school to make Tyson Kidd useful.
That said, Vince seems committed to giving managers a try. Arn Anderson is next out of the chute. Arn will be great. He can talk, he’s the right size, he can work, he’s still in shape. Arn could be one of the best managers EVER.
This is a part of Madden's recent column on the WZ main page. Spot on. The situation with Cole/Lawler has run its course. Cole will not benefit anymore from this and Lawler shouldnt have to tarnish his legacy with cheap jokes about his mom to keep his spot. Gaining heat for Cole didnt have to come at the price of pushing Lawler into the ground and making Swagger a 'lackey'.
I do like the idea of bringing back managers, but Hayes/Kidd isnt the combo to start with IMO. The idea/use of a manager in this version of the WWE will never work like it has before (Heenan,Fuji,Albano, etc). Given the circumstances it could have some benefit. Pair Sheamus or McIntyre with Finlay, or Ron Simmons with Ezekiel Jackson. The younger crew will gain experience and the crowds/viewers will eat up the nostalgia. The sheer presence of legends will envoke a positive response and help surround the newer talent with a 'buzz' from the crowds. NXT might have had a better drawing if the pro/rookie pairings made more sense. If done right, the much needed talent overhaul can have new stars made sooner rather than later. The idea of the manager is to enhance the talent, not overshadow it by a mismatched pairing.
Obviously Madden rubs folks the wrong way at times, but this is one of those editorials that hits the nail on the head.
Thoughts on the column? Lawler/Cole? Manager and Talent pairing suggestions?