Lose ECW and bring back WCW

[Shadowmancer]

This concept is absolutely crap. WCW and ECW lost the majority of its fan base when it went out of business. ECW wasonly brought back as a Brand because it would be known to still have a cult following that watched its old PPVs, As for a WCW brand it would be the closest thing to just out and out saying that they were creating a new WWE brand. ECW had product recognition. the original Idea for ECW was to have them tour small arenas with better production of the product than the old ECW. As for expanding to 3 brands, it was inevitable that they did that, the rosters were getting too big just to fit on RAW and SmackDown, while it has turned into a nightmare in terms of the brand extension as a whole going to shit and having them have everyone turn up on all the Brands.

 

[ricflair1983]

I think this is a great idea. ECW has a cult following that's why it is not accepted by those fans. WCW was just like the WWE. Flair could be the general manager and they could use people already on the roster for the WWE who used to be in WCW and I think they should get their World Title back (the one Undertaker currently has) since Taker will be losing the title anyway, give it to someone who was champ back in WCW. Too bad Booker is injured

 

[TNA Smark]

I agree, the only reason WWE brought back E.C.W was because it was a different style of wrestling and etc. WCW had the same format as WWF/E. If you think about it SD! is like WCW as it has the majority of WCW talent like Chris Benoit, Eddie Guerrero(they had him), Chavo Guerrero, Gregory Helms and etc. But bringing it back won't do anything good because it would be like RAW and SD! except different wrestlers where as E.C.W had a better atmosphere and etc. but that all died during the ressurection phase now known as WWECW.

 

[andreaandi]

ecw sucks. The storylines are so bad, there is no real ECW. pAUL Heyman is gone, RVD is going to Tna, and whats left. ECW is Vince Mcman owned, not Paul Heyman or Todd Gordon, and as long as mcman qwns it, forget it, what else could i say.

 

[noone911]

WCW was a competitor to WWE. As someons said prior, Smackdown would essentially be WCW.

The best thing would be for TNA to be actual competition to WWE. So that both are forced to hve better products.

 

[thelcon21]

ECW IS DEAD.....because

1) No Sabu

2) RVD is leaving

3) Sandman will probably be fired.

4) No extreme rules matches. Why call it ECW if it is not going to be extreme? They might as well change it and give it a Raw or Smackdown name. It basically is the minor leagues of the other brands. They might as well call it Nitro or something. They can have Raw/Smackdown/Nitro.

5) Bobby Lashley is their number one guy. He has no mic skills and like John Cena is being thrown down our throats.

6) Vince McMahon is the ECW champ because there is no one else to give it too.

They might as well just get rid of the whole brand all together. They have no GM and no wrestler that will grab your attention and make you turn it on. Raw has HBK, Orton, Cena (ha), Triple H (when healthy), Mick Foley (sometimes) and Ric Flair. Smackdown has Edge, Kane, Batista (ha), Mr Kennedy, Undertaker (when healthy), and Benoit. ECW has Bobby Lashley who I put in the same boat as Cena and Batista. Three moves, no mic skills and shooved in our faces.