"Just When You Thought..." | Page 3 | WrestleZone Forums

"Just When You Thought..."

Status
Not open for further replies.
The people who keep you in here want you in here far, far more than they care about your stated opinions. But keep pushing that boulder, Sisyphus.
 
Not hardly... My statements about Lebron are no more-or-less-factual than those made by any other member here. My Username is not at all factual, either.

I will admit to stating my own opinions if: Sly & all others in the discussion do the same, I am properly released, & my original name is restored.

So you do understand, and you really are a liar, ******ed, a crybaby, a troll, and a bitch (and all are provable within your last few posts)

No one else has tried to pass off their opinions as fact, you're the only one with the ego big enough to think that. But you keep making your little demands, see if anyone listens
 
Better than Lebron, & probably you as well.

So now you are saying that YOU are better at basketball than LeBron James. And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.

People have said I need to provide evidence, & I have. The size/magnitude is irrelevant.

Where did you provide evidence? You mentioned ONE shot that he missed. By that logic every single person to ever play basketball sucks at it.

The sad thing is you don't even truly believe LeBron sucks. You've just dug yourself so deep in this hole that you'd rather just continue to sink lower than admit you were just upset about him leaving Cleveland. You said some stuff out of anger. That's cool. It's been two and a half years. Get over it. It's ok to admit he's a great player. You can still say you hate him for the way he left your team but to say he sucks just proves your bitterness and/or stupidity.
 
So now you are saying that YOU are better at basketball than LeBron James. And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.

Actually, I only said it b/c I was asked our comparative talent. It's been true for years, & I would have said it all during that time.

Where did you provide evidence? You mentioned ONE shot that he missed. By that logic every single person to ever play basketball sucks at it.

As I said before, that's true.... Only if you're delusional enough to believe that's the only one he ever missed. There's video & stats all over that prove otherwise.

The sad thing is you don't even truly believe LeBron sucks. You've just dug yourself so deep in this hole that you'd rather just continue to sink lower than admit you were just upset about him leaving Cleveland.

The sad thing is you might believe some of what you post about me &/or him. I was the happiest guy in the state the day he left, & I believed he sucks/sucked even when he played in high school near me.

You said some stuff out of anger. That's cool. It's been two and a half years. Get over it. It's ok to admit he's a great player. You can still say you hate him for the way he left your team but to say he sucks just proves your bitterness and/or stupidity.

I didn't say anything out of anger; I stated facts, & it is not I that has trouble handling it. What I DO have trouble with is "admitting" anythng, as that requires I concede it is true/valid, & it is the exact opposite.
 
Actually, I only said it b/c I was asked our comparative talent. It's been true for years, & I would have said it all during that time.

Please just answer with a yes or no. Are you better at basketball than LeBron James?

As I said before, that's true.... Only if you're delusional enough to believe that's the only one he ever missed. There's video & stats all over that prove otherwise.

Thank you for pointing that out. I thought that one shot that you saw was the only one he ever missed. Other than that one I was under the impression that he made every single shot he's ever taken. You understand sarcasm, right?

You want a stat? LeBron is 3rd all time in points per game behind only Michael Jordan and Wilt Chamberlain. With all the other great players in NBA history how could LeBron possibly be so high on the list if he isn't a great player.

LeBron has finished in the top ten in MVP voting every year of his career. The top five for the past seven years. He's won the award three times. That tells me he's a great player. You really need to learn to not let your personal feelings cloud your judgment.
 
Please just answer with a yes or no. Are you better at basketball than LeBron James?

I already said I was... How much does that say about me, though? Someone born during tonight's Halftime show could perhaps be better than Lebron by the end of the week.

You understand sarcasm, right?

Yeah; It's what makes anyone call you "The Brain".

You want a stat? LeBron is 3rd all time in points per game behind only Michael Jordan and Wilt Chamberlain. With all the other great players in NBA history how could LeBron possibly be so high on the list if he isn't a great player.

For one, as I already stated, many players have taken far fewer shots, meaning they both made & missed far fewer.

LeBron has finished in the top ten in MVP voting every year of his career. The top five for the past seven years. He's won the award three times. That tells me he's a great player. You really need to learn to not let your personal feelings cloud your judgment.

I don't. But that placing tells me he gets a lot of votes from a lot of people placing him very high in each of their minds/voting. That's true, but that doesn't make it correct.
 
I already said I was... How much does that say about me, though? Someone born during tonight's Halftime show could perhaps be better than Lebron by the end of the week.

For one, as I already stated, many players have taken far fewer shots, meaning they both made & missed far fewer.

I don't. But that placing tells me he gets a lot of votes from a lot of people placing him very high in each of their minds/voting. That's true, but that doesn't make it correct.

I was having some fun with you before, but now you're just boring me. You've always been a shitty poster but at least you were kind of a fun troll. I actually believed there was a chance that you thought the nonsense you were spewing was true. Take it as a compliment. It means I thought you were a good troll. For you to say something so ridiculous that you are a better basketball palyer than LeBron is just too much. You can't even pass that off as something you actually believe so this is where the conversation ends. You want out of the prison so badly, right? Maybe I'll just ban you. Will that make you happy?
 
I was having some fun with you before, but now you're just boring me. You've always been a shitty poster but at least you were kind of a fun troll. I actually believed there was a chance that you thought the nonsense you were spewing was true. Take it as a compliment. It means I thought you were a good troll. For you to say something so ridiculous that you are a better basketball palyer than LeBron is just too much. You can't even pass that off as something you actually believe so this is where the conversation ends. You want out of the prison so badly, right? Maybe I'll just ban you. Will that make you happy?

I've always been a good poster; You were the one lacking quality. I admit to lacking quality at being a troll, which I never have been, nor have I ever tried to be.

What I have tried to be, & been successfully, is better at basketball than "King" James. No matter what you think (if anything at all), at this moment, that is something I truly believe.
 
I've always been a good poster; You were the one lacking quality. I admit to lacking quality at being a troll, which I never have been, nor have I ever tried to be.

Okay, this is normal behavior for you.


What I have tried to be, & been successfully, is better at basketball than "King" James. No matter what you think (if anything at all), at this moment, that is something I truly believe.

This is, quite possibly, the most delusional thing I have ever seen on these forums.
 
I can't do that. To do so would mean I would need to read every post on these forums to confirm it.

Entirely untrue.

I have neither the time nor energy to do so. I'll stick with "possibly" as my statement.

That'd be fine... If that had ever been your statement, but it was not.

Since you also never stated it to be untrue, we'll just leave it that we are both in agreement I am a better basketball player than you or Lebron. Glad we got that sorted-out.
 
Entirely untrue.



That'd be fine... If that had ever been your statement, but it was not.

Since you also never stated it to be untrue, we'll just leave it that we are both in agreement I am a better basketball player than you or Lebron. Glad we got that sorted-out.

I said "might possibly" in my original statement. Nice to know you're either lying or ******ed.
 
Folks, let's be objective here. It is entirely possible, although very unlikely, that LRCTB is better at basketball than Lebron James. He could, for instance, actually be Kobe Bryant, although if I was Kobe Bryant I think I'd be too busy sodomizing white women to post on the prison section of a professional wrestling message board.

In the absence of knowing LRCTB or having any information on his basketball skills, we're forced into a comparison of the odds of a random person being better at basketball than Lebron James. James is widely considered one of the best players in the NBA, by both his peers and the sports media, but let's give LRCTB the benefit of the doubt and say that not only is every player in the NBA better than Lebron James, but there are enough people in the world better at basketball than Lebron who remained undiscovered by the NCAA and NBA to bring that number up to an even thousand.

So there are 1,000 people better at basketball than Lebron James- using an extremely lenient measurement- and near 313,000,000 people in the United States. I'll leave people to do the exercise in determining the odds that this random person is better at basketball than Lebron James.

So, I direct this specifically at you, LRCTB. The "this is obvious" argument is inherently flawed, as it can be used to justify any argument regardless of veracity and depends on circular logic to resolve itself; "it is obvious because it is obvious". The same justification would allow me to say "the sky is orange". For a practical demonstration of how "this is obvious" isn't the case, I could also say "it's obvious that the sky is blue".

So do you have anything objective that you can offer to demonstrate your superior basketball skills? Currently we are forced into examining the odds that a random person is better than Lebron James, but if we had a side by side of you and Lebron, that could help your case.
 
Folks, let's be objective here.

THAT is "very unlikely".

It is entirely possible, although very unlikely, that LRCTB is better at basketball than Lebron James.

That is not only possible & likely, but true. Proof? I am male, a living American, & not Lebron. Therefore, there's a darn-good chance I am better than he is at basketball.

In the absence of knowing LRCTB or having any information on his basketball skills, we're forced into a comparison of the odds of a random person being better at basketball than Lebron James.

True, & (Miz-like speech pattern here) they are..... ASTRONOMMMMICALLLL!!!!

James is widely considered one of the best players in the NBA, by both his peers and the sports media, but let's give LRCTB the benefit of the doubt and say that not only is every player in the NBA better than Lebron James, but there are enough people in the world better at basketball than Lebron who remained undiscovered by the NCAA and NBA to bring that number up to an even thousand.

This is all true, especially if you also state many who consider him near the best are in mental hospitals &/or the actually-******ed members of the planet.

So there are 1,000 people better at basketball than Lebron James- using an extremely lenient measurement- and near 313,000,000 people in the United States. I'll leave people to do the exercise in determining the odds that this random person is better at basketball than Lebron James.

What exercise? Living male who is not Lebron is quite likely to be better.

So, I direct this specifically at you, LRCTB. The "this is obvious" argument is inherently flawed, as it can be used to justify any argument regardless of veracity and depends on circular logic to resolve itself; "it is obvious because it is obvious".

I am male & not Lebron, so odds are very high I am a better player than he is.

The same justification would allow me to say "the sky is orange". For a practical demonstration of how "this is obvious" isn't the case, I could also say "it's obvious that the sky is blue".

The sky being blue can be proven when you look at it, much as Lebron being bad, & certainly worse than most living male Americans.

So do you have anything objective that you can offer to demonstrate your superior basketball skills? Currently we are forced into examining the odds that a random person is better than Lebron James, but if we had a side by side of you and Lebron, that could help your case.

We don't have to prove I am great by any means; Simply prove Lebron is not as great as many claim him to be, & the odds I am better go highly in my favor... Done.
 
Maybe you should provide actual proof. Just saying you are better doesn't make it true. What's funny is that Lebron is considered one of the best basketball players around in this generation, and you think you are better just because you don't like him. I'd love to see you two go one on one and watch him beat you. You probably wouldn't even score. Of course the chances of this happening are slim to none because you don't have to balls to challenge him in the first place. :shrug:
 
Just saying you are better doesn't make it true.

True, but the same can be said for "just" claiming he is better than me.

What's funny is that Lebron is considered one of the best basketball players around in this generation

By some, not all.

and you think you are better just because you don't like him.

No. I am one of few people that have seen both of us play. I've seen him play, & I've also seen me play. My ability is leaps & bounds beyond his.

I'd love to see you two go one on one and watch him beat you.

You can do one or the other, but not both.... And the latter only if I throw the game.

Of course the chances of this happening are slim to none because you don't have to balls to challenge him in the first place.

I don't "have to balls"?! On the contrary, I have t(w)o, & while I can't be sure, I'm betting he does too. Why don't we each keep our anatomical balls, & each get an actual ball to shoot simultaneously?! That's the only way he'd make a shot against me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top