The point about Maloney was because QPR were literally seconds away from having a chance to stay up. I know that is football but they, and Remy, were so close. I'm saying that IF Wigan didn't score the free-kick and Samba didn't have an absolute shocker against Fulham, QPR would probably stay up.
And my point is that Remy shouldn't be praised because another footballer had the cheek to do what he was being paid to do a score a goal.
You do realise QPR have 6 games left and 4 of them are against Arsenal, Liverpool, Everton and Newcastle. So even
IF those things happened QPR would still go down.
Remy has arrived in the Prem, scored 5 goals and given his team a chance to stay up and all the obvious benefits that entails.
Even though since he arrived QPR are a point further away from survival then they were when he arrived and like i mentioned above they have 4 unwinnable games coming up.
Obviously Michu as had a better season than Remy. However, I think that Swansea have shown they have quality elsewhere that would cope without. They would still have finished in a respectable position. That is nothing compared the Remy could have had on QPR.
Yeah they would be just fine without the guy who scored 17 goals this season
![Lmao :lmao: :lmao:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/lmao.gif)
You admit Michu's had a better season and you know he has cost Swansea a fraction what Remy is costing QPR therefore he's a better signing. Why is this so hard for you to understand. Do you have a fetish for spouting bullshit?
I exaggerated the top 5 of the entire season
See that wasn't so hard was it? It's much easier to just admit your wrong rather then running around in circles with hypothetical situations to try and justify your stupidity.
but it could have been different. Remy's performances have been decent - his goals valuable - if QPR stayed up than he would have been an incredible signing. That is what I was implying- a hypothetical situation that was very close to being a reality, that if Maloney didn't score, QPR would have a very good chance of staying up. IF QPR stayed up than he would have been a very very good signing.
But that's all it is, a hypothetical situation and should have no bearing on judging a players ability.
Is Remy a good player? Yes
Was he a good signing for QPR? Fuck no
Fact is QPR realised they were in trouble and attempted to buy their way to safety. Samba and Remy were panic buys. They club payed over the odds in transfer fees and wages to convince them to join and they are worse off points wise from it. Remy and Samba are not worth 100 grand a week so neither have any business being considered good signings.
A good signing is where you sign someone who performs at an ability better then their price tag and wages suggest, Remy is not a 100k a week player and certainly has not performed like a 100k a week player therefore he is not a good signing.
There is a difference between a good player and a good signing.