I've Noticed a Change in Slyfox696 | WrestleZone Forums

I've Noticed a Change in Slyfox696

Milkyway!

Hodor!
Whenever I first joined this forum Slyfox was the man who ruthlessly debated stupidity and defended the likes of John Cena, Hulk Hogan, etc. He never complimented a single poster, and more often than not he would belittle everyone's intelligence but his own.

Now I've lurked the forum for years, posting ******ed shit here and there. Yet I haven't been "active" except for about the past month or so. Unfortunate for you people, fun for me.

However, upon returning there's one key thing I've noticed about these here forums. Slyfox696 is no longer the scoffing alcoholic father ruthlessly beating his children via debates, and he has grown into Grandpa Sly. He's still the same old opinionated man; however, the key difference is he's no longer icy cold with his debate, no longer belittles his opponents, yet he tell teaches them the error of their ways.

Thanks Grandpa SlyFox696. ^_^
 
You just haven't read enough of his shit. Go troll the prison a bit.

The prison has always bored me to death.

He still insults peoples intelligence.....

No where near as much.

I've noticed that you have a very poor perception of things around here.

I've noticed that you enjoy belittling me. For what cause might I ask? My perception is not poor, in the least. Slyfox speaks with far more emotion in debates than he ever has before, whereas he used to only speak with more objectivity than subjectivity. In his recent debate with you, he actually used more subjectivity than I had ever seen him use before; which is what actually prompted me to write this post up.


Obviously I was being a tad factious with some of my remarks on the intelligence, the drunken father, grandpa, etc in an attempt to poke fun. Nonetheless his debating style has changed quite a bit since his arrival here at WrestleZone, and I simply hadn't noticed due to my lack of actually reading the debates around here.
 
I've noticed that you enjoy belittling me. For what cause might I ask? My perception is not poor, in the least. Slyfox speaks with far more emotion in debates than he ever has before, whereas he used to only speak with more objectivity than subjectivity. In his recent debate with you, he actually used more subjectivity than I had ever seen him use before; which is what actually prompted me to write this post up.

Find one other time that I've belittled you.
 
I've noticed that you enjoy belittling me. For what cause might I ask? My perception is not poor, in the least.

>Makes a subjective comment about himself

Slyfox speaks with far more emotion in debates than he ever has before, whereas he used to only speak with more objectivity than subjectivity.

>Acts like he understands being subjective
 
Find one other time that I've belittled you.

Maybe not directly belittled. However, I've found that nearly all interactions with you have been a negative one. Negative tones such as "I've noticed that you have a very poor perception of things around here." It comes off as very condescending to me.

Maybe I simply haven't interacted with you enough to know. Maybe you're just a negative person. I don't mean to be rude. I'm simply stating my opinion. Hence my asking you directly.
 
>Makes a subjective comment about himself



>Acts like he understands being subjective

You're another person who directly treats me with a negative tone for no real reason. I honestly have no idea who you even are. Maybe it's a name change since my inactivity. Yet, you made how many comments on the thread maker of Harthan's thread? There's really no point to it.
 
Maybe not directly belittled. However, I've found that nearly all interactions with you have been a negative one. Negative tones such as "I've noticed that you have a very poor perception of things around here." It comes off as very condescending to me.

Maybe I simply haven't interacted with you enough to know. Maybe you're just a negative person. I don't mean to be rude. I'm simply stating my opinion. Hence my asking you directly.

I assure you I didn't mean it to be condescending. I meant that you make a lot of observations that seem to be off base, like saying you read all of Stormtrooper's posts and then say no more than a couple posts later that you don't read all of his posts, or how you were surprised that Miko was posting despite the fact that he's been here for months.

In short, your power of observation does not seem to be strong, at least when it comes to WrestleZone. That's not necessarily a bad thing.

I have nothing against you, and it is not my intent to belittle you.
 
I assure you I didn't mean it to be condescending. I meant that you make a lot of observations that seem to be off base, like saying you read all of Stormtrooper's posts and then say no more than a couple posts later that you don't read all of his posts, or how you were surprised that Miko was posting despite the fact that he's been here for months.

In short, your power of observation does not seem to be strong, at least when it comes to WrestleZone. That's not necessarily a bad thing.

I have nothing against you, and it is not my intent to belittle you.

I'm pretty sure what I meant to say was I read all of ST's posts that I see when scrolling through threads. Not every single little bitty post he ever posts. At least that's the way I meant it.

Well. I've only been truly active on WrestleZone reading everything I see for about 3 days now. I pop in occasionally, post something I've personally found funny, and typically leave without even checking for responses.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top