PlayTheGame
The Cerebral Assassin
A very popular storyline in the WWE (especially in the last few years) has been, for the lack of a better term, "legend killing". Randy Orton based his early character soley around being the "legend killer". At WM24, HBK referenced Flair as being like "Old Yeller". Countless other Legends who have been brought back for matches (names like Hogan come to mind) over the past few years have also been put into the same type of legend-killing/old school vs. new school type of storyline. Another great example that comes to mind was the ECW New Breed vs ECW Originals which took place not too long ago. Now, at WM25, yet another Legend-killing-esque program will culiminate with the Jericho/Legends match.
It seems like every WWE legend thats brought back is always placed in this sort of new vs. old type of program. Is this being used too much, and, if so, should the WWE be inputing Legends into other types of storylines instead? Or do you think thats really the only option that the WWE can go with in regard to their Legends?
Is the whole Legend-Killing thing getting old in the WWE, or is it just simply neccessary when a Legend is involved?
It seems like every WWE legend thats brought back is always placed in this sort of new vs. old type of program. Is this being used too much, and, if so, should the WWE be inputing Legends into other types of storylines instead? Or do you think thats really the only option that the WWE can go with in regard to their Legends?
Is the whole Legend-Killing thing getting old in the WWE, or is it just simply neccessary when a Legend is involved?