It's Damn Real!
The undisputed, undefeated TNA &
TNA interested in the American Wolves and Roderick Strong (again)?
Tag division could sure use the Wolves.
Tag division could sure use the Wolves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It was reportedly noted to F4WOnline.com by backstage sources in NXT that it was pretty shocking how much WWE officials were stressing over the fact that TNA was taping Impact in Orlando, which is so close to the NXT taping in Winter Park.
There's no question that the WWE sees TNA as competition.
Dude, that report is made up horse shit. WWE films NXT once in a fortnight and TNA does it 3 days straight every 2 weeks. Why the hell would NXT sweat about attendance? Not to mention it's just about 1500 for either show. This is clearly just crap for hits on their sites.There's no question that the WWE sees TNA as competition. While they may not be on the same level financially, the products are extremely comparable. Sometimes it's not about which company is the most popular, but which puts on the better show. A lot of the times it isTNA.
No they don't.
According to PWInsider.com, despite WWE's continued claims that TNA is not competition to them, it's being said that when TNA announced it would be taking Impact on the road, WWE began calling a number of mid-sized venues and placing them on hold so TNA cannot book them for events.
It's also being said that if TNA does in fact run shows every Thurday night that WWE is considering running events on the same nights in the same areas, possibly in an attempt to lure fans away from TNA.
Dude, that report is made up horse shit. WWE films NXT once in a fortnight and TNA does it 3 days straight every 2 weeks. Why the hell would NXT sweat about attendance? Not to mention it's just about 1500 for either show. This is clearly just crap for hits on their sites.
As far as the competition thing goes, are we really calling TNA's flagship show vs. WWE's minor league show competition? That's what TNA has come to now?
If you were referring to my post, I was trying to say that if the TNA creative actually put a lot of effort in, which they are capable of, they can be competition to the WWE (product wise that is, I'm not talking about being a threat them). I'm sure there have been times where you have enjoyed watching Impact more than RAW.
Sometimes yeah. That doesn't make them competition though. Competition means I have to pick one over the other. I can easily watch everything both companies put out without one interfering with the other.
No, it really is about what show is more popular. Always. The more people you have coming through the gate and watching your television show, the more people you have buying $29.99 t-shirts and $80 replica title belts. Is there some great panel of artists out there judging professional wrestling on artistic merit that I haven't heard about? So far as I'm aware, this is strictly a money making operation.There's no question that the WWE sees TNA as competition. While they may not be on the same level financially, the products are extremely comparable. Sometimes it's not about which company is the most popular, but which puts on the better show. A lot of the times it isTNA.
They are well known. Slightly less than a million people watch Impact every week. Lack of awareness is not what TNA's problem is right now, and TNA hasn't had the lack of awareness problem since maybe 2006. TNA's problem is that people are aware of them, but don't care enough to make time in their Thursday night schedule (or on their DVR's, apparently) to watch.I suppose those periods when they are doing well, they don't gain a whole lot of the WWE fans, but if they were well known, I think they could manage that.