Lee
Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No it's Supermod!
At least its believable that Santino wants the title.
that's the one redeeming quality he has.
We know he's capable of wreswtling, we're not stupid it's his CHARACTER that sucks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
At least its believable that Santino wants the title.
Really, I need to explain this shit again?, ok this time I want you to fucking read the post, so I don't have to go through this with ever again
I think my post from the RAW LD last week puts it best
Do you get it now?, do you understand the words that I have post on the fucking screen in front of your face?!?
If his character started locking people into arm bars, would that make sense? The IC title hasn't had importance in a long time. At least its believable that Santino wants the title.
I really can't believe even a blind man of not noticing how he has had a string of good promos in the WWE.
What made the Rock and Chris Jericho funny? a lot of the same things you will say for them, you could say for Santino. You cannot deny that, or you are a hypocrite.
It would if they had him go away for a couple months, then show him training and learning new moves/holds, then when they bring him back he incorporates a few new moves every now and then
They don't even have to be good matches. Just believable matches. Matches where you can suspend your disbelief, and fall into the emotion of the match.Yes Rock and Jericho are funny in the same way Santino is. One difference: They have good matches to back it up.
No, I'm saying if he could put on a match that made you think there was a small bit of realism to it would make me think differently about him.So are you saying that if Santino started hitting some good technical moves, you'd like him?
The Rock was a believable seller. Yeah, he oversold the Stunner, but for the most part, his selling was appropriate and was good showmanship. Santino's selling is neither.I wasn't really comparing Santino to the Rock.
No, I was merely pointing out that if Santino is unrealistic, he isn't the only one. Not by a long shot.
What the fuck is the difference?Plus, I'd rather see someone oversell any day, than seein' someone no sell the hell out of something. At least the oversell/unrealistic is at least believable in one way or another, but the no sell.. Oh, hey, I just got dropped on my head, but I'm gonna get right back up.
No, I'm saying if he could put on a match that made you think there was a small bit of realism to it would make me think differently about him.
What?Well with the character he has right now started to lose or win strings of matches, which one is believable. If he gets beat down, but managed to sneak out the win, like many of the greats did, would that make him a good wrestler? If he never won match, would that make him good?
Not really. Moveset really isn't that big of a deal. It's how you perform the moves and work the match that matters.For Santino to be a good wrestler, he needs a complete moveset overhaul. To begin with, he needs a moveset.
Back to the original topic, kind of at least, there's no way Santino goes as long as Honky did. Honky was around in a different era, where he was seen on tv far less and with far less ppvs, and at least he was a somewhat believable champion. His record is safe.
Agree, if anything I see this leading to a short feud between Santino and Honky, possiably with Honky costing Santino the belt, but nothing more
anyone who watches Raw knows there's an IC belt, they don't need santino to tell them.
Believable matches.What would make him believable Sly?