Wrestling memory is usually only a few months, unless commentators need to bring up the past, seeing a year dead feud reignite isn't the most awful things, some characters evolve, Bray Wyatt specifically has evolved quite a bit since he last feuded with Mr. Taker. Giving Husky another chance to work with the legend should do nothing but empower his dark side even further, and perhaps may even be a good chance of passing the torch. Everytime Vince gets interviewed he can't stop mentioning Bray Wyatt as the first person on his list of young stars he's high on.
I've always wished the continuity of stories stayed relative for even longer, I hate when a previous feud is completely ignored, Outside events like Royal Rumble and (in the past) King of the Ring, the narrative turns a blind eye to past events unless Michael Cole or JBL need to misinterpret a statistic.
Taker vs Brock was just a money grab, they didn't have a plan or match worked out, and it's the perfect example of why having specialty match ppvs has ruined the effect of them (outside Elimination Chamber and Royal Rumble, which need to be their own yearly specialties for obvious reasons.) Without digressing the topic to that though, it was fairly obvious Vince knows just tossing their names on the card would push more WWE Network 1 month trial expirations.
Brock vs Show would have been a lot better if we didn't know Brock vs Taker wasn't going to be right around the corner, making it the most obvious glorified squash match possible.
I guess the real end point I'm looking towards, all of the rematches make good sense from a booking perspective.
