Yeah....animals in the animal kingdom have homosexual sex with each other as a way to solidify relations amongst the members of the pride/group/etc. To say it isn't natural or against the theory of Evolution is foolhardy, and a mistaken application of the Evolutionary theory. Which I'm not surprised of, really, considering the same people who think the theory of Evolution is wrong are the same ones who would try to mistakenly apply it here.
Since it's natural, who are we to say no to those people who live that way? There's no reason to. It's like telling a person he can't be Bi-Polar, and should pray it away. That's just plain ******ed.
If a gay person hits on me, I take it as a compliment. Mostly because I'm secure enough to realize that that man finds me attractive, but that doesn't mean I would give him a blowjob or take it up my ass. He might want to do a bit of catching, but I'm not pitching.
I'm with South Park on the idea of the word "******." It's used for annoying people, not necessarily gay people. At least, now it is. A person can be a gay ******, no doubt. But there are also straight ******s, like those people who are belligerent in Wal-Mart because an item rang up for 2 dollars and they mistakenly thought it was supposed to ring up for $1.70.
Just like how me and my friend decided to redefine the word ****** a year and a half ago. ******s, as we said, are people who negatively reflect on their race as a whole. Those lazy fuckers in the city that draw Welfare for 10 children and drive around with a 2010 Cadillac and 40-inch rims? Yeah, ******s. Those white rednecks that are not only card carrying KKK members, but somehow also Southern Baptist and have 5 arrests for Domestic Violence? Yeah, ******s.