Lesnar
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I agree with much of what you said about Liddell. He was a beast but only in retrospect. Like you said, he was doing things better than everyone else at the time. He just never evolved at all. Everyone around him got better and he stayed the same.
All of the things that can be said about Liddell though can easily be said of Couture. Really how is it any different? If anything, Randy should get more credit for doing it at an older age and doing it better still than Liddell does it. Couture hasn't lost a step and he's even improved in some areas, Liddell hasn't. I honestly believe if there was a third match between the two Couture would take it.
Lesnar
I never argued against Couture.
What it comes down to is Chuck was fairly one-dimensional, but that one dimension he did very well, AND it allows him to ALWAYS have a chance. He had great takedown defense, and he was always one punch away from winning a fight, and it doesn't matter how much the sport of MMA evolves, getting hit on the button will still knock you out if delivered with enough force.
Chuck may have been one-dimensional, but when it works, why bother with something else? Now that he's older, he probably doesn't have the same snap to his punches, nor the same power behind them, and thus, his quality will drop...but what he does at his age now doesn't change what he once was.
We are in agreement then. What he did, he did extremely well. He had the chance to improve in other areas and just didn't. There could also be a lot of outside forces contributing to his current state like booze and drugs. He wouldn't have lost all of his skills THAT fast after a knockout loss to Evans. He would have kept some of it but as of right now I don't see him even being able to beat guys like Soszynski.