Hey jmt | WrestleZone Forums

Hey jmt

Via Armbar

Has a pretty good dick.
Would it be possible to do a pound for pound mma tournament? I know it doesn't have as much support as some other sections, but if we could rally a lot of the people here that some what follow the sport but don't post in that section perhaps it could work? Thoughts?
 
Tournaments are booked all the way up through October, so sometime by the end of the year it would be possible. But, I would only want to do it if by that time we have at least around 5 more regular MMA posters.
 
That would be a badass tournament, to be honest.

Still, I think the tournament schedule is quite full this year?
 
I'd love to do it. Obviously we would need to build the support for it but I think it can be done. The posters we have now who would support it know their shit enough to make it interesting. Tons of potential.
 
Wouldn't Fedor pretty much take it by default? What argument would you really use against him?
 
The same could be said about Hogan and the current tournament Rizza. A lot of people don't rank Fedor at number one on pound for pound lists. I really think that their can be some great debate in this and if it happens I look forward to arguing why there's a couple fighters that can take out Anderson.
 
The same could be said about Hogan and the current tournament Rizza. A lot of people don't rank Fedor at number one on pound for pound lists. I really think that their can be some great debate in this and if it happens I look forward to arguing why there's a couple fighters that can take out Anderson.

True, True.

If this tournament goes down, I'l be debating for Big Nog till the end.
 
I could definitely show some support for Big Nog. As history has shown though, he won't get past Fedor.

lol, no he probably wouldn't, no shame in that though, I think Fedor should win this whole thing, thats just me though. A. Silva would have a strong showing, as would GSP, BJ and Rampage would probably also get some love. This tournament would be about them in their primes, yes? Then Liddell could go pretty far too, I hope this goes down.
 
lol, no he probably wouldn't, no shame in that though, I think Fedor should win this whole thing, thats just me though. A. Silva would have a strong showing, as would GSP, BJ and Rampage would probably also get some love. This tournament would be about them in their primes, yes? Then Liddell could go pretty far too, I hope this goes down.

Not that I don't like Liddell, but I think he's one of the most overrated fighters in history. He seemingly was spoon fed fighters that were talor made for him, but that's just me. I think GSP would get past Silva honestly.
 
Not that I don't like Liddell, but I think he's one of the most overrated fighters in history. He seemingly was spoon fed fighters that were talor made for him, but that's just me. I think GSP would get past Silva honestly.

Chuck is awesome in my eyes, he was like, the champ for the casual fans, his beatdown on Jeremy horn at UFC 54 is what got me into MMA. Now that I look over his record though, he really didn't face many great strikers until the end of his career. Babablu, Couture, Belfort and Ortiz(first time) weren't bad at all though.

I'm not sure if I would put GSP over Silva or not, I could be swayed on that one. I would probably go with GSP though. I'm not sure if Silva could stuff his takedowns, and GSPs ground control and submission defense is amazing. So once Silva was down, I don't think he would do much gettin' back up. Or work anything out from the bottom.
 
Not that I don't like Liddell, but I think he's one of the most overrated fighters in history. He seemingly was spoon fed fighters that were talor made for him, but that's just me.

Wow, you just earned major respect in my book for speaking the truth on that one. You know how much I've wanted to mention that and use it against you? So bad I could taste it. I never wanted to offend anyone by insulting the guy though because as I've seen it, a lot of MMA fans seemingly worship Chuck Liddell, but I have felt for years that he was just an overrated guy with a bunch of tailor made spoon fed opponents as you mentioned.

When he was becoming really popular is when I started resenting MMA big time. You want to know what turned me sour on MMA, there it is. The UFC touting this guy as the baddest man on the planet, when I knew of at least a couple handfuls of Boxers that would wipe the floor with him. Then seeing all these fans trying to act like Chuck Liddell was the best fighter in the world, like he was just too bad, badder than Michael Jackson in the video Bad, so bad he can just annihilate any opponent with his ferocious attacks of windmill punches, and duck like footwork.

The Tim Sylvia regime turned me away big time too. I couldn't tell you how glad I was when Andre Arlovski pieced his ass, revealing him as the big, talentless dummy he is. I got a video for you to see about that too. But then when he was on top all the fans go on again "Tim Sylvia's such a bad ass, he's the best fighter in the world, uuggghhh I like Tim Sylvia uuugggh, watching MMA makes me a bad ass in my Tap Out shirt uuughhhh." ok chief, whatever. Yeah, and next month when someone kicks his ass, and another temporary champion gets the title, it will be the same story. It's like "look, your a fucking idiot, and you know nothing about fighting, don't try to tell me who is good and who isn't, I've been educating myself and been taught my whole life on fighting and martial arts, I will be able to tell who is good" Hence the reason you've never heard me criticize most of the top talent in MMA.

Maybe some of that will make sense to you as to why I really got turned off by MMA. Here's that video too.

[YOUTUBE]<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cZFgOaVSoKs&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cZFgOaVSoKs&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x5d1719&color2=0xcd311b&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]

Take not that in the video the say they were going to be boxing but they are clearly fighting MMA style.
 
As far as boxing in mma goes, Liddell was okay. He in no way, shape or form the epitomy of was mixed martial arts is though. I don't want to hate in him because he was a good fighter, but I've never though of him as anything more than a good striker. He never improved other areas of his game and paid the price in his last couple of fights. He was the go to guy for people who didn't actually know shit about mma but wanted to sound like they did.

Sylvia isn't as bad as that video would make him appear. Maybe he's not that bad now, but he wasn't always. He was a okay fighter during his day, but he was also the champion of an incredibly weak division. I know not even you would try and use that fight as an argument for boxing being better. Both men were out of shape and way past their prime. You know there are a ton of strikers that would destroy Mercer in a fight. Sylvia hasn't been worth a damn in years and even you should know that. He was never even considered a top five pound for pound fighter. Maybe top ten at one point, but definitely not top five.
 
a lot of MMA fans seemingly worship Chuck Liddell

I just wanna say that if their are many MMA fans that worship Liddell, alot of it has to do with what he represents IMO. Since the new breed of fighters, Chuck has been exposed as a C Level fighter, and really people just think of him now that dude you could just flip on the TV back in the day and he would have been busting someones head in. Back in the day, Chuck was thought of as the man, but now everybody loves Chuck because of the nostalgia and the good ole "tough guy" image that Chuck has, mohawk, goatee, busting heads with wild overhand rights, all the things the early days were all about.
 
As far as boxing in mma goes, Liddell was okay. He in no way, shape or form the epitomy of was mixed martial arts is though. I don't want to hate in him because he was a good fighter, but I've never though of him as anything more than a good striker. He never improved other areas of his game and paid the price in his last couple of fights. He was the go to guy for people who didn't actually know shit about mma but wanted to sound like they did.

I couldn't agree more. It's pretty fair to say it like you did "as far as boxing in mma goes, Liddell was okay." For mma standards of hand skills, obviously he was a cut above a lot of the other guys. I just could never stand a lot of the fans and the hype machine a lot of them fed into. It's the same thing as with the Juggalo's, same type of people, but gravitating to mma instead or something. You get what I mean?


Sylvia isn't as bad as that video would make him appear. Maybe he's not that bad now, but he wasn't always. He was a okay fighter during his day, but he was also the champion of an incredibly weak division.

Oh but listening to the UFC and most of the fans at the time you wouldn't have know the division is weak. That's the kind of thing I am talking about. While he was coming into his reign, in it, and exiting they passed off sub-par opponents for mma's standards even, and acted like Tim Sylvia was some fucking world beater or something when all he did was plow over some chumps that he was big enough to giver a hard time. There's another thing, he hardly ever fought anyone his size, always smaller opponents with shorter reaches.

On the flip side of the coin, people are quick to try and discredit the credibility of boxers records and competition. But, if you were to try and do the same thing about a lot of these mma guys you're completely in the wrong and know nothing about mma of anything else. Double standards like that and fans acting that way are some of the main things that turn me away from the sport.



I know not even you would try and use that fight as an argument for boxing being better.

Try me.......... No, I'm just kidding. I will say though that Ray Mercer was much better at what he did in his prime than Tim Sylvia was in his, and that is reflected in the outcome of the fight. In this case the Boxer was better than the MMA fighter, but don't get me wrong, I have seen it go the other way as well. Just not with people as well known as those two. That's probably the most high profile Boxer vs MMA fighter match ever though.



Both men were out of shape and way past their prime. You know there are a ton of strikers that would destroy Mercer in a fight. Sylvia hasn't been worth a damn in years and even you should know that.

Both guys were out of shape, and both are past their prime. But, Sylvia is still much younger and they were going by mma rules which means Sylvia could have done all that stuff that you guys generally say would happen, but as I've said it would happen before, he didn't get a chance. That should have played a role in that fight, unfortunately though ol' Tim couldn't go 30 seconds with the way past his prime old former heavyweight champion.

Mercer was 48 when he fought Silvia this year and turned 49 already. That's pretty old by Boxing standards, it's not as common for guys to fight to the end of their 40's. Bernard Hopkins is an exception not the rule. Time Silvia was only 34 which is still prime for Boxing, and still pretty young for mma, he should have been able to do something to Ray Mercer for God sake. I mean fuck, this guy is 6' 8'' and about 290 maybe don't to 270 when fit. Mercer as you saw was a short stubby 6' 1'' bu comparison, and maybe 250 out of shape. No Excuse Sylvia, None.

I would have liked to see both guys get more of an opportunity to use their crafts, and see the positives and negatives of each one play their roles in the fight.



He was never even considered a top five pound for pound fighter. Maybe top ten at one point, but definitely not top five.

As I elaborated on earlier, you wouldn't have known that when he was in the UFC and he was the Heavyweight champ, or even before of after his reign. Nope, he was "The Maaiiinnnneeeiac" big bad Tim Sylvia, shit wrecking ball busting bad ass Tim Sylvia, UFC Heavyweight Champion. He probably was ranked up there, especially if he was the champ, he's had to have been. Technically as he was the champ he was above the rankings.
 
To ellaborate on Chuck Lidell he was the casual fans favorite because he was entertaining, he had a likeable personality and put on entertaining fights. Back in the day a Chuck Lidell fight was what everyone liked to see but couldn't really in boxing or mma, he was a guy that would stand up and throw, and that is what alot of casual fans like to see. Casual fans like myself like to see people get knocked out and get a little bored when two guys are wrestling around in each others gaurd through the whole fight with little to no striking. Not alot of people want to see that through the entire fight and get bored but with a Chuck Lidell fight you were getting to see alot of action and possibly a K.O.
 
Liddell is overrated, and so is Randy Couture.

Liddell is nothing but a puncher with a glass jaw. I know his fights are action packed and appeal to the mainstream crowd, but he just was never good.

Couture, on the other hand, has his fights built up to all hell like he's a legend, but he loses as much as, and lately more than he wins.
 
Liddell is overrated
I disagree with this, and a lot of the Liddell hating going on. People are dismissing what he did because of when he did it. What people DON'T take into account is when he started fighting, MMA was different (at least in the UFC) than it is now. Chuck was very good, because he adapted his whole style on the then-present day style of UFC fighting. I saw someone say something about how Liddell has been exposed as a "C level" fighter...how so? Liddell was the Light Heavyweight champion until the age of 37 YEARS OLD! How many athletes, in ANY sport, show great success at that age? Very few in any sport that requires athleticism.

To dismiss what Liddell did during his prime because of the style he fought would be akin to dismissing what Babe Ruth did because pitchers didn't have relievers. You can't dismiss his accomplishments simply because what he did to accommodate the style of the time.

Liddell is nothing but a puncher with a glass jaw. I know his fights are action packed and appeal to the mainstream crowd, but he just was never good.
He was 20-3 until age caught up with him. He won most of his fights by stoppage, and of the ones that went to decision, almost all, if not all, decisions were unanimous. He fought the best fighters that were available at the time, and beat them all.

To hold against him what happened in the twilight of his career seems silly to me.

Couture, on the other hand, has his fights built up to all hell like he's a legend, but he loses as much as, and lately more than he wins.[/QUOTE]
 
I don't completely agree with those arguments Sly but you seem to know your mma well enough to do a good job with debate if this thing ever happens.
 
I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that Sylvia was pegged as som world class athelete Game Rage. He has the same amount if not less hype than any other champion has gotten. Even when he was champion a lot of people knew it was because UFC had a weak division at the time. Nobody ever said he was the epitome of the business.
 
I disagree with this, and a lot of the Liddell hating going on. People are dismissing what he did because of when he did it. What people DON'T take into account is when he started fighting, MMA was different (at least in the UFC) than it is now. Chuck was very good, because he adapted his whole style on the then-present day style of UFC fighting. I saw someone say something about how Liddell has been exposed as a "C level" fighter...how so? Liddell was the Light Heavyweight champion until the age of 37 YEARS OLD! How many athletes, in ANY sport, show great success at that age? Very few in any sport that requires athleticism.

To dismiss what Liddell did during his prime because of the style he fought would be akin to dismissing what Babe Ruth did because pitchers didn't have relievers. You can't dismiss his accomplishments simply because what he did to accommodate the style of the time.

He was 20-3 until age caught up with him. He won most of his fights by stoppage, and of the ones that went to decision, almost all, if not all, decisions were unanimous. He fought the best fighters that were available at the time, and beat them all.

To hold against him what happened in the twilight of his career seems silly to me.

Couture, on the other hand, has his fights built up to all hell like he's a legend, but he loses as much as, and lately more than he wins.

I agree with much of what you said about Liddell. He was a beast but only in retrospect. Like you said, he was doing things better than everyone else at the time. He just never evolved at all. Everyone around him got better and he stayed the same.

All of the things that can be said about Liddell though can easily be said of Couture. Really how is it any different? If anything, Randy should get more credit for doing it at an older age and doing it better still than Liddell does it. Couture hasn't lost a step and he's even improved in some areas, Liddell hasn't. I honestly believe if there was a third match between the two Couture would take it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top