I've eluded to it a couple of different times now. ...but let's act as if I never did. I challenge you to name one decade in professional wrestling history, prior to the year 2000, when smaller guys like Jericho, Punk, Jeff Hardy, Mysterio and AJ Styles became world champions on a regular basis. None of the men I just mentioned weigh over 230 lbs.
Hart, Backlund, Diesel, Hart, HBK, Sid, HBK, Hart
Seems pretty regular to me. And that's just from the 5-7 years before 2000.
Also, it seems as if you have kind of a short memory. Allow me to refresh it:
Size is totally irrelevant in wrestling today for the most part. Gone are the days when being a roid freak went hand in hand with being at the top of the card.
Keep that in mind as we go through the rest of this.
Roddy Piper was never world champion
But he was a main-eventer, at the top of the card, which is what you said.
I mentioned him being an exception to the rule.
I know, but it just helps the list.
The Million Dollar Man was never booked to win a world championship (that I know of). I'm pretty sure his championship was purchased from Andre The Giant. Besides, Dibiase was a 260 lb man. That's hardly small.
He was still main-eventer. And he wasn't 260 pounds. He may have been billed as such, but there was no way.
Besides, you said you were looking for builds, not specific weights.
Rick Martel was never world champion, and I don't even remember him being a main eventer either.
Probably ought to refresh your AWA knowledge then.
Kurt Hennig was never WWF champion, but did hold the AWA championship. Hennig was a 260 lb man. Again, that's not small.
And just like with DiBiase, there was no way he was 260 pounds, and he was a main-event player for a while.
was never a "smaller" man (billed weight = 300+ lbs)
Was never a 'roid freak either.
MANY on again/off again Horsemen were never world champion (I mentioned Flair being an exception to the rule)
But they were at the top of the card. You seem to be changing your criteria as we go along.
I didn't think of funk (billed weight = 247 lbs)
Score another for me.
not a "smaller" man by any stretch of the imagination. He was billed as weighing 300+ lbs.
But not a 'roid freak, which is what you said.
Quit changing the scope of the discussion.
I'll give you credit for this one (billed weight = 245 lbs.
Score another for me.
I didn't consider Bockwinkel either. Once again, I'll give credit where it's due. (billed weight = 241 lbs)
And another.
Considering you don't even remember what you said in the first place, I'm not really surprised.
Now's the time in the "argument" where you act as if I'm saying Dibease, Dusty Rhodes and Sgt. Slaughter were roid freaks, right? Well, in my defense, I never imagined anyone would list The Million Dollar Man and a couple fat bodies as examples of smaller men being main eventers. Then again, I didn't think anyone would list Rick Martel as a main eventer either.
I still don't understand why you tried to lay into me for seemingly no reason. The point I made remains valid. Smaller men get ahead in the business WAY more often these days. It's a fact.
Except it's not a fact. Not that smaller men don't get ahead, but that they didn't get ahead 20 years ago.
There's several things you seem to be taking for granted. First of all, billed weight 20-30 years ago is much different than today. I would say most of today's wrestlers are billed appropriately. But decades ago, it's a known fact they would overbill their wrestlers height and weight, to make them even more larger than life. Are you really telling me that Ted DiBiase, at the same height as John Cena (6'1") weighed 20 pounds more (260 to 240)? That's just foolish. Cena is EASILY bigger than DiBiase and likely weighs more. So your arbitrary cut-off weight of 230, while ignoring what you first said, is probably hit more often two decades ago than you think.
Second of all, the WWE has two different and distinct branches of it's promoting (three when Punk first came up). When Hulk Hogan ruled the world, there was just one world title, and no one was touching it. If today's rosters were merged, and there was only one World title, do you think Punk would have ever come near it? Rey? Of course not. Undertaker, Cena, Triple H, Batista, Orton, HBK, Jericho, and Edge would be passing it around. Jeff Hardy if he was at all reliable would be the closest thing a "smaller build" guy would have at a chance. But not Rey and not Punk.
Finally, wrestling promoting is a MUCH different beast today than it was 20-30 years ago. In the 80s, Hulk Hogan could go 4 years as World Champion (and did), because he didn't appear on TV every week. There wasn't a PPV for him to defend his title at every month.
The smaller guys were showcased just as much 20-30 years ago as they are today. Do they have more world titles to show for it? Sure, but that's a product of the system they're in, not a change in booking philosophy.
The overall point of this is you cannot say Punk has a better chance now of being a superstar than he would have 20-30 years ago, because while promoting has changed, what draws fans really hasn't. Punk is not likely to be a mega draw, ever in his career. That's not a bad thing, it's just a thing.
You've gotta be kidding, right? Hogan holding people back is all but common knowledge, but there's no way in hell Vince would've put his title on a 175 pound man in the 80's heyday....Hogan or no Hogan.
Hogan didn't hold people back in the 80s, there was just no one better suited to wear the title.
Hogan was the biggest draw in pro wrestling history. Do you really think ANYONE could have taken the title off him? Hell, even Andre, the biggest man of them all, couldn't take the title off of Hogan.
It has nothing to do with size, but with the fact Hogan was revolutionizing the business and making McMahon lots of money.
I highly doubt Mysterio would've been considered for the WWF Championship in 1996.
If he had the reputation and career behind him then that he does now, absolutely he would have.
Mysterio was active in WCW at this time. Why was he never WCW Champion? Surely it has something to do with his size
That's completely asinine. There are many reasons.
1. He was young and didn't have a suitable body of work
2. The WCW had a million big guys, whereas the WWF didn't, so not really seeing your point.
3. The nWo
4. Sting
5. Goldberg
Do you see where I'm going with this? But if you put today's Rey Mysterio, with his Hispanic following, and long career and accomplishments down in the WWF from 1994-1996, absolutely he would have been considered for a World title.
...and let's try to refrain from using words like credibility when discussing a fake sport. If credibility had any place in pro wrestling, Rey Mysterio would rarely win a match.
The credibility he has with the fans. Try to keep up.
I remember reading that Bischoff didn't see Jericho as championship material due to his size, and he's huge compared to Mysterio.
That's an interesting piece of knowledge. Unfortunately for you, that has absolutely nothing to do with the WWF in 1996.