So they threw us a curve ball, putting Christian on ECW and making Matt Hardy the attacker, thus surprising everyone.
I'm not sure if i'm right here, i'm probably not but Matt Hardy said in a blog of his that the plans where for him to always be the attacker, not Christian. He said this:
Speaking of Christian, we have a very long and storied history together. Christian was a recipient of my star-making abilities back in the first ever tag team ladder match. Christian was also smart not to stick his nose into my business with Jeff. I could see how he would be tempted to upon resigning with the WWE, but fortunately he was smarter than that. It's also funny how alot (sic) of the "internet journalist" and "internet fans" thought Christian might be somehow associated with me and my master plan. Nope. Never has been. There's never been any changes in my plans, there's never been a "B" plan, and Christian hasn't ever been factored in at any time.
Everything added up to Matt, not Christian, it was just a co-incidence that Christian left TNA at the time the storyline began. Anyway, it's not so much 'our' fault, but the people who report the plans. Granted some are just doing they're job, and we don't have to read the stories sites dish out. But Matt said that the plans where for him to always be the attacker, so if he's telling the truth, how is it our fault? Christian is on ECW, but he's a star on there, also they're probably just building a foundation for him because of his return, I wouldn't be surprised if he got drafted/moved to Smackdown next year, and put into title contention. The problem is that we wont ever know if Christian was supposed to be the attacker, because we where going off sites which aren't always 100% reliable, and we then have a guy who was the attacker, who works for WWE telling us that WWE had been planning it to be him for months. Personally, I thought it was just a hard lesson of 'Don't believe everything you read', obviously not an intentionally lesson, but still.