Evan Bourne is a very entertaining person to me. I love his style, and I love his energy. He also has some good moves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JnzyjrnRck
I personally love his Cyclorama.
The point of this thread, however, isn't to show off his moves, it's to ask why wrestling organizations Book him as a jobber. In TNA (Impact Wrestling) from 2004-2005 he lost almost every single one of his matches. In WWE, he is used for everyone else to throw around and beat up. Now obviously he is 1/2 of the WWE Tag Team Champions, but I find it rather sickening that in all those tag matches, Bourne will wrestle, and get his ass kicked, and then finally he finds an opening to tag Kofi, Kofi makes the save, trouble in paradise, then Bourne does his shooting star press for the win. I'm not complaining of them winning, I'm complaining on how the WWE books him as a weak competitor. Everyone is saying "Evan sucks, he is nothing, has no talent, etc." when it's the wwe writers/chairman who controls what happens to him.
Do you agree with me?
What should happen to make Bourne seem like a better competitor?
The most obvious answer to the last question would be, simply, have him not be a jobber, be more involved in his tag matches, and WIN singles matches. I wouldn't mind seeing him compete for the U.S. championship.