Yes, he is.
So? Who gives a flying fuck? The simple fact is we already have one thread about Triple H, so there was no need for another, especially since we have enough bitching threads about Triple H to begin with. Yours was going to turn into that, even if that's not what you intended.
Bullshit. And a half.
Go through the Archives (well, when you can) and see how many Cena threads have been closed over the years. Why? Because there was already an Official Cena thread, and those posts should have gone in there.
You're off on this one. Badly.
Which you admit was the same thing you asked in another thread.
If you want, you can look at it this way. You spammed the forum by making a thread about a post you had already made in a thread that was designed for the topic of your new thread.
Spam. Infraction and thread closed. You just got your thread closed. Either way, you lose.
Then you're REALLY not going to like talking to me on these forums...
Meh, this makes you sound like an asshole. The sad thing is I think you actually have some sense in your head, but your whining here is commonplace amongst anyone who is told no, much akin to a child being told he can't watch TV anymore.
Grow up, accept the fact it was closed, and move on. It's not like you're the first person to have a thread closed.
So, you admit that you posted in the thread, AND got an answer.
Then why the hell would you make a new thread? Just because you didn't like the answer, doesn't change the fact your new thread is spam, and wasn't needed.
Taken straight from the WZ Rulebook:
Your thread didn't contribute to the betterment of the forums, and you yourself have already explained why. You're proving NorCal's case with every new post of yours.
And if you sassed the teacher in that case, what would have happened? You would have been disciplined, correct?
Well, here we are. You didn't listen, so you were disciplined. And here is the rule you broke there.
Well, I'm not sure, but maybe THIS is the reason:
Now, I know size 72 font is hard to read sometimes, but it's very clearly stated in the first post of the thread.
So, I see a point.
I think I've already explained three separate rules that you have broken?
If I wanted to get creative, I could probably come up with a couple more.