The Kliq - Shawn Michaels, Kevin "Diesel" Nash, Triple H, Scott "Razor Ramon" Hall and Sean "X-Pac/Syxx/1-2-3 Kid" Waltman - are all extremely famous in their own right. Obviously Hunter and Shawn have had the most success but no one could objectively call any of the others failures. They each left unforgettable marks on wrestling history.
But of them, Scott Hall's legacy is the saddest because it could have been so much more. The question I pose to all of you is how much more?
Scott, in addition to his demons, seemed to lack ambition. He didn't care aboout being the top guy like Trips, Nash or Shawn. He just wanted money and to hang with his buds.
So, if he had stayed clean and tried to be #1, where do you think he'd be?
Look: 9. Second only to Nash in standing out, he was quite tall which you didn't notice because he fought a lot of big guys. When he was in shape he had a very nice body to boot. And of course who can forget that awesome face and hair of his.
Charisma - 9 or 9.5
10 is reserved for the absolute charismabeasts like Hogan. But Scott positively sweated machismo. He had a swagger about him that was unmatched. He was so popular in WWF they had to turn him face. And, if anything, his charisma only grew when he went to WCW. His surveys were awesome and he could get major pops just with "Hey Yo" after a while.
He was also far more natural on the mic than Triple H or Shawn in my opinion.
In-Ring Skill: 6. Not the best worker ever but he did okay for himself. Had a really nice fallaway slam and of course the Outsider's Edge was great.
So, what do you think of my assessment of his talents? And if we rank the Klq Success as Shawn > Hunter >>> Nash >>> Hall/Waltman, how far could Scott have gone up?
But of them, Scott Hall's legacy is the saddest because it could have been so much more. The question I pose to all of you is how much more?
Scott, in addition to his demons, seemed to lack ambition. He didn't care aboout being the top guy like Trips, Nash or Shawn. He just wanted money and to hang with his buds.
So, if he had stayed clean and tried to be #1, where do you think he'd be?

Look: 9. Second only to Nash in standing out, he was quite tall which you didn't notice because he fought a lot of big guys. When he was in shape he had a very nice body to boot. And of course who can forget that awesome face and hair of his.
Charisma - 9 or 9.5
10 is reserved for the absolute charismabeasts like Hogan. But Scott positively sweated machismo. He had a swagger about him that was unmatched. He was so popular in WWF they had to turn him face. And, if anything, his charisma only grew when he went to WCW. His surveys were awesome and he could get major pops just with "Hey Yo" after a while.
He was also far more natural on the mic than Triple H or Shawn in my opinion.
In-Ring Skill: 6. Not the best worker ever but he did okay for himself. Had a really nice fallaway slam and of course the Outsider's Edge was great.
So, what do you think of my assessment of his talents? And if we rank the Klq Success as Shawn > Hunter >>> Nash >>> Hall/Waltman, how far could Scott have gone up?
And in case you're wondering, I would assess the rest of the Kliq as:
Shawn
Look: 6, maybe 7.
Charisma/Mic Skills: 9.5
In-Ring ability: 9
Triple H
Look: 9
Charisma//Mic Skills: 7.5
In-ring ability: 7
Kevin Nash
Look: 10
Charisma/Mic Skills: 8.5 or 9
In-ring ability: 4 in the WWF when he was more agile
X-Pac
Look: 3 or 4
Charisma/Mic Skills: 6 (he gets underrated in this department)
In-ring ability: 8.5
Shawn
Look: 6, maybe 7.
Charisma/Mic Skills: 9.5
In-Ring ability: 9
Triple H
Look: 9
Charisma//Mic Skills: 7.5
In-ring ability: 7
Kevin Nash
Look: 10
Charisma/Mic Skills: 8.5 or 9
In-ring ability: 4 in the WWF when he was more agile
X-Pac
Look: 3 or 4
Charisma/Mic Skills: 6 (he gets underrated in this department)
In-ring ability: 8.5