I guess television deceives. Nonetheless Edge is smaller than Cena in terms of build as well as John is smaller than Cena and all that.
But JoMo has a bigger build than Edge (in terms of muscles).
Jeff Hardy is another case. He was actually interesting. He is superior to John Morrison. Both in getting over and in-ring ability. The problem between Jeff and John is that John doesn't amaze people like Jeff does. Jeff has an amazing finisher. But he just as well has a lot of experience jumping off ladders. Which is what build his legacy.
Jeff also had the benefit of entering WWE at a VERY young age (to this day he and matt are the youngest tag team champs in history, I believe), and also being in the tag division at a time where it was at its peak. Morrison did a lot of good things in the tag division himself, with Mercury and then Miz, and he didn't have the Dudleyz or E&C to counter-balance him.
In terms of ring ability, Hardy was underrated, especially his mat skills, but I don't think he was all that better than Morrison. Was he more over than John? Of course, but that doesn't mean that Morrison can't obtain that level of overness and even ring prowess with time and a little more experience. Like I said, despite the similar age, Hardy had the benefit of 4 or 5 years of WWE experience over JoMo.
Moreover their mic skills are comparable.
Just because he doesn't have a storyline it doesn't make him more credible if he had one. He kinda has one against Teddy now. But it's still boring. Ted could benefit from much more. And yes I see Ted coming out the beneficial person of this feud.
But see that's kind of my point. He doesn't have a direction, he's kind of floating without a proper feud, yet WWE still finds the need to put him on TV every week, put him in matches and even on PPVs (whereas Ted is likely going to be left off of SummerSlam, Morrison draws into the non-title main event).
It's a shame that RAW's writers can't seem to book a match that doesn't directly affect a feud. If they were more like SD's writers, you'd see John in matches against Edge, Jericho, etc, like he was on smackdown, and you'd see him shine, regardless of storylines.
Probably. He'd have smaller guys to fight with. People he could look credible against on SmackDown. But there's a problem there as well. Lots, and I mean lots of people are more worthy of the World Heavyweight Championship on Smackdown already than John is gonna be if he gets drafted. Therefore eliminating the purpose anyway.
I don't think we're arguing worthiness though. If championships were decided over worthiness, then Christian and Matt Hardy would have been world champs a LONG time ago. But in terms of look, drawing potential and potential effect on the company, I would take Morrison as a world champion over either of those guys. He's younger, he has more years left on him and, as far as I'm concerned, can hang in the ring with anyone just as much as they can.
It's definitely harder to go over guys like Sheamus and Triple H if you're smaller, but that's why they have 2 shows, and that's why Rey Mysterio is on the smaller show. I think Morrison is kind of nicely placed in between those two extremes.
He's not that incredibly over. He's no Orton, John Cena, Christian, Big Show or Rey Mysterio. The most over people in the company. (I can live with canceling out Christian. I don't pay attention to pops)
And even with that. John doesn't fit into the world title scene right now. There's so many other people far superior to him. With a much, much bigger potential to actually make a run for the world title. If John ever gets a title. It's gonna be Guerrero style. A title for the sake of giving him a title because he's a veteran. And Morrison is no veteran yet.
These are fair points. And I'm aware this particular set of comments wasn't directed towards me, but I think in 2-3 years, we'll be having an entirely different conversation when it comes to John Morrison.