Could any character "recover" from a failed MITB cash-in?

kvtiger_8

Dark Match Jobber
Since its inception, every Money in the Bank winner has cashed in successfully to become champion. We know that sooner or later, someone will cash in and fail. Some people assumed Daniel Bryan would cash in and fail, but his character really shined after successfully winning the title.

Let's throw some questions out there:

Who could you see winning the briefcase and failing on the cash-in?

Could this "character" still seem legitimate after failing, or would it haunt them?

How would you book a failed cash-in?
 
First things first...Good thread :) seriously

Who could you see winning the briefcase and failing on the cash-in?
Hmmm very interesting question I could go two ways with it but I'm going the underdog route and say Zack Ryder. He's a perennial underdog and wouldn't be out of the ordinary to see him cash in and lose.

Could this "character" still seem legitimate after failing, or would it haunt them?
Yes they could. Even if Zack fails in the most epic way ever, he could still be turned around into a contender. WWE can have him go over whoever they want after all Pro wrestling is staged. It will be hard yes but can be done.

How would you book a failed cash-in?
In the MITB match I would have Ryder take a huge bump like thru a table outside the ring off the latter and be carted off by officials. Then with the match winding down and the Big Show about to grab the briefcase I'd have Ryder return knock Show off and grab the briefcase. So after all that I'd have Cena win the strap off Punk, then I'd have Ryder challenge Cena straight up one on one at the Royal Rumble for the title.

At the event after 20 min or so Cena pick Ryder up for the AA Zack counters with the Rough Ryder he's slow to cover after using his last bit of energy as he crawls what must seem like a mile to him he finally covers Cena the ref counts 1........2.......The ref gets pulled out of the ring by the Big Show. The ref DQ's Cena, Ryder win's but Cena retains!

Now after the PPV it could go a couple of ways.

1. John Cena will say Big Show messed up the match and give Ryder a rematch for the title.

2. Ryder could feud with Big Show and work a nice program to build himself into the ME.

3. John Cena would turn heel and say Ryder had his chance and he failed. (As cool as it would be I doubt this scenario, just putting it out there)
 
With WWE continuing with the 2 ladder matches at the MITB PPV instead of having just one at WrestleMania I think it is inevitable that someone will lose their cash in. I think the best way to do it though would be to have someone completely unexpected win the brief case and mistakenly challenge a dominant champion. Now I'm not advocating that the Big Show win another world title but if he does end up champion, having someone cash in on him and lose would make Show look more dominant as a title holder. Ryder would be a good choice as someone mentioned already because he's already over with the crowd so people would root for him even more if he lost as an underdog. But there is one scenario I think would be absolutely perfect.

Santino Marella. Hear me out on this one. Don't you remember how absolutely crazy the live crowd was going when Santino was the last person Del Rio eliminated in the rumble? Or when he was the last guy left in the Elimination Chamber vs Daniel Bryan? It's easy to make him win the ladder match because they're so chaotic all he has to do is climb the ladder when everyone else has taken each other out. Then you have him come out and cash in on some random heel champion, doesn't matter who really. If the heel has been beaten down enough, it will look like Santino might actually become champ. After about 5 minutes the crowd would be going absolutely nuts but then the heel cheats and retains. Santino is already over and he'd be just as over, if not more so, after the fact. Not to mention that a heel cheating to beat a guy like Santino is easy heat. The crowd would hate him for it. Obviously Santino won't ever hold a world title because of his character but he's damn entertaining so it would be a great 1-2 month story line for an Over The Limit type PPV.

Any way you slice it though, the only way a character could recover from losing a MITB cash in is if they were a face. How could a heel ever garner heat if he loses what is usually essentially a squash match? People just wouldn't care about him because he's not a real threat. But creating an underdog situation almost always works. People love underdogs, even after they lose.
 
Who could you see winning the briefcase and failing on the cash-in?

There are countless people, but for my scenario I'll take Kane.

Could this "character" still seem legitimate after failing, or would it haunt them?

There is absolutely nothing that will make Kane look illegitimate. He can loose clean to Santino, Ryder, and Hornswaggle, back to back to back, and then win the title the very next night.

How would you book a failed cash-in?

The way I'd book a failed cash in would be to have a very good heel hold the WWE title for about a year. It would have to be a top guy that could generate heat that long. Cena/Punk/HHH/Orton. I think I'll use Cena just because he's WWE's biggest guy and can easily give somebody a rub.

Have Cena beat down The Rock at Mania and turn heel. At extreme rules he wins the belt. He carries it all the way until next years Mania. Him and Rock will resolve their feud at Summer Slam. I'd have Alex Riley or Ryback start getting a huge face push. I think both guys will be big stars. Have one of them win the Royal Rumble and announce they will face Cena. Have a good 15-20 minute hardcore match and in the end have the face pull out a huge victory to close the show. Confetti fireworks all that good stuff, then BOOM! Kane's pyro. Riley/Ryback can barely stand and Kane cashes in. After another 5-10 minute match the face wins again.

In this scenario we learn it is possible for the MITB winner to loose, we don't hurt a young star, and MITB is still used how it's intended, to build a new star. In this case a new mega star.
 
Who could you see winning the briefcase and failing on the cash-in?

I'd go with a guy no one would expect and say Alex Riley.

Could this "character" still seem legitimate after failing, or would it haunt them?

Riley was far from legitimate when they pushed him the first time. He was arguably a bigger jobber when he was with the Miz than he is now, and pushing him then seemed so random. It would be easy to give him that random push again now that he firmly has the fans behind him despite not being on TV.

How would you book a failed cash-in?

I'd give him a slow low key build like Daniel Bryan got last year. Have him start racking up victories over low card guys, as well as the likes of Miz & Swagger, but job to guys like Del Rio, Bryan & Kane in lengthy back and forth competitive matches. Riley would announce that he's cashing it in the legit way at a PPV like Survivor Series. By this time CM Punk would still be Champion or will have lost and regained it.

Punk and Riley, as we've seen, have a bit of an on-screen bromance. However, Punk would start bringing up a few of Riley's past blunders, such as his DUI, hoping to light a fire under Riley and motivate him because he wants to see him succeed, even if it would ultimately lead to him losing the WWE Championship.

The two of them would have their match at Survivor Series. It would be a close battle, but Punk would win. After the match, Punk raises Riley's hand as he's proven himself to the WWE Universe.

The following night on RAW, Punk & Riley would come out and celebrate their amazing match, only for Daniel Bryan & The Miz to come out and ruin their fun. The main event of RAW would be Punk/Riley vs. Bryan/Miz with the faces going over.
 
I'd actually use a guy like Alex Riley to win the briefcase out of nowhere and give him a slow low key build like Daniel Bryan got last year. Have him start racking up victories over low card guys, and announce his cash in at a PPV like Survivor Series. By this time CM Punk would still be Champion or will have lost and regained it.

Punk and Riley, as we've seen, have a bit of an on-screen bromance. However, Punk would start bringing up a few of Riley's past blunders, such as his DUI, and the ending of NXT Season 2, hoping to light a fire under Riley and motivate him because he wants to see him succeed, even if it would ultimately lead to him losing the WWE Championship.

The two of them would have their match at Survivor Series. It would be a close battle, but Punk would win. After the match, Punk raises Riley's hand as he's proven himself to the WWE Universe.

The following night on RAW, Punk & Riley would come out and celebrate their amazing match, only for Daniel Bryan & The Miz to come out and ruin their fun. The main event of RAW would be Punk/Riley vs. Bryan/Miz with the faces going over.

That's a good idea too but I don't think WWE likes doing pre-announced cash ins or they would have done more than one. I think this would work though but it would only work if it's face vs face and the match was back and forth.
 
I genuinely believe LOSING when cashing in Money in the Bank could've done a world of good for several superstars. I also feel that it should happen very soon with another, and it gives the opportunity for some real character development, rather than putting a belt on someone with no one giving two shits. For example:

Jack Swagger: Swags was a mid-card talent. With little to no build, other than winning a qualifier in his hometown, he gets Money in the Bank thrown on him. Then Jericho/Edge had the championship factor removed from their feud and the belt was instantly pinned on Swagger. He proceeded to have an incredibly uneventful reign and because of the horrible booking going into his championship win, he's in the same place now, 2+ years later, as he was prior to winning the belt. Mid-card obscurity.

The Miz: Miz is also in a very similar situation. Provided, some heat backstage for dropping a certain miscreant on his head and current movie role are keeping him out of the picture; The Miz didn't benefit much from Money in the Bank. Sure, The Miz won the WWE Championship from Randy Orton, held the belt for 5+ months and even Main Evented WrestleMania, but if you ask any casual fan what that card was about, they'll say Cena and Rock. The only reason The Miz was in the main event was because he was in the right place at the right time.

The Miz even won at WrestleMania, and isn't considered a viable top heel by many casual fans, more so than he's just an annoying prick who they don't like seeing on TV. The Miz and Jack Swagger are two who have tapered off horribly since their Money in the Bank runs. Even Alberto Del Rio has, but he's got a political ace in his pocket that's continuing a push in a long flat-lined character. If your fucking ring announcer is more entertaining, and more over than you, there's a problem.

Why LOSING Money in the Bank can be BENEFICIAL: Let's say you give Money in the Bank to someone like The Miz, just for example. He's seen as an overly cheesy character. And honestly, his lack of intensity is what ruins him for me. I was a big Miz fan UNTIL he started getting pushed. Call me a ****** hipster, but I loved him as the Host of SmackDown and I loved the Chick Magnet. But ever since his US Title run and the IWC kind of decided they didn't hate him, I've hated him. Once again, call me a ****** hipster, I'm cool with it..

The Miz just doesn't look like he has the ability to be a top heel in my opinion. However, he LOOKS like a babyface in my eyes. He's not a bad heel when all is said and done, but if you take away Rock/Cena, he's never going to be the WrestleMania main event talent. I'm also convinced that Vince was just into pushing the whole 'self-made man' type success story of someone who shouldn't have been there. Regardless. I think winning Money in the Bank this year, but FAILING to capture a championship could do The Miz a world of good. Here's why.

1. Reintroduced to Main Event scene: Let's face it, the Main Event championship scene has changed drastically since The Miz had the title. In fact, I think the only reason Miz had the strap to begin with was the company was trying to get away form the endless Orton/Cena brigade. John Cena's been out of the title picture for quite some time. Orton's not in the picture right now. CM Punk's the #2 name in the company. Sheamus is a babyface. Cody Rhodes is scratching the surface. Christian's made his way into the mix, etc. The Miz has much stiffer competition nowadays, plus, Nexus won't be there to beat someone down for him.

2. Drive: Whether I like the Miz or not, you have to respect his devotion to honing his craft and his lust for success. So I don't doubt that The Miz can make it back to the Main Event scene, however, I genuinely feel his talents would be better suited as a babyface. Perhaps not in the ring, and it would require an adjustment period, but his personality screams babyface. A tweak of the momentum build-up, perhaps another finisher and a solid feud with someone like a Cody Rhodes, could establish him as a viable face. And we all know he has the tools to make it work.

My Idea: Say Miz DOES win Money in the Bank. What I personally would've liked to do was see him be indecisive as to which championship to go for, despite I believe WWE wanting to make the briefcases exclusive to each title. If we get a heel WWE Champion soon, I'd say The Miz should tease a turn with the WWE Champion. Perhaps try to cash in a few times but get the Daniel Bryan ordeal worked up. Cash in, and something thwarts the match and prevents the title from changing hands or the match from happening at all. From there, jump over to Smackdown while some people are peaking interest in you, and go after Sheamus or Orton, whoever is the champion at that point in time.

Why? Because people would have started building a connection and admiration for him taking on a face, and would feel almost stabbed in the back by him placating his old ways and looking for an easy way out. Sheamus nowadays would be perfect for The Miz, because he's a hard-worker in the ring and his gimmick is based essentially off having to be able to out-fight him to beat him. Have The Miz smarmily try to take his belt, and fail. This will give Miz something to be legitimately angry about. This would cause constant outbursts and stuff of the sort, and would make him a first of a kind. A title that would be pinned on him forever. And through that, could go on a spurt of constant disqualifications and be fairly ruthless, subsequently take the easy path to getting reactions. Or. The Miz could lose and constantly demand rematches, Christian esque. He can get somewhat of a Jeff Hardy push. Be constantly in the main event, put on the best matches capable, and have a slowburning face turn. Eventually, have someone, preferably a heel, like I said with Cody Rhodes, take the World Championship from Sheamus, and have The Miz finally take the title from him instead.

That way, you'll have an organic face-turn that won't be forced, and you'll be able to set up the natural feud of Cody Rhodes' moment in the spotlight being taken by a selfish man who hogs the spotlight in The Miz, blah blah blah, the storyline essentially builds itself. Furthermore, I apologize for using The Miz as an example, as I don't want to come off as a big mark for him, because I'm not. I simply couldn't plot out a more in-depth example!
 
I would love for a face to try and cash it in then a enemy heel comes in and attacks his opponent. That would cause a dq and would be a cool way to eaither start a fued or continue one.
 
Personally I thought Daniel Bryan was perfect for this.

He built it up so much about waiting till mania, What if he waited for mania but STILL LOST IN 18 SECONDS?!?!

The WWE Universe would have gotten behind him even more IMO and then since he would be face, he could be the ultimate underdog, win the title shortly after and have a lengthy reign as a really strong, technical, underdog babyface with alot of support. Which is the biggest thing WWE is lacking. Really strong faces and heels. And personally I think Bryan is an awful heel.

Someone can still do a simular thing but I think Bryan worked best for it and now the time has passed, so if someone does cash in and lose, I think it will be too late and no one will care and that guy will go on to be burried.
 
I genuinely believe LOSING when cashing in Money in the Bank could've done a world of good for several superstars. I also feel that it should happen very soon with another, and it gives the opportunity for some real character development, rather than putting a belt on someone with no one giving two shits. For example:

Jack Swagger: Swags was a mid-card talent. With little to no build, other than winning a qualifier in his hometown, he gets Money in the Bank thrown on him. Then Jericho/Edge had the championship factor removed from their feud and the belt was instantly pinned on Swagger. He proceeded to have an incredibly uneventful reign and because of the horrible booking going into his championship win, he's in the same place now, 2+ years later, as he was prior to winning the belt. Mid-card obscurity.

The Miz: Miz is also in a very similar situation. Provided, some heat backstage for dropping a certain miscreant on his head and current movie role are keeping him out of the picture; The Miz didn't benefit much from Money in the Bank. Sure, The Miz won the WWE Championship from Randy Orton, held the belt for 5+ months and even Main Evented WrestleMania, but if you ask any casual fan what that card was about, they'll say Cena and Rock. The only reason The Miz was in the main event was because he was in the right place at the right time.

I agree with Swagger but I don't agree with Miz at all. To say that Miz didn't benefit much from MITB is a ludicrous statemen. Sorry man, but it really is. The Miz had a significant spot within the main event scene in WWE, he had one of the longest World Championship reigns we've seen in WWE for several years now, he was featured prominently against huge stars like John Cena & Randy Orton and, yes, main evented WrestleMania. I agree that Rock & Cena got more attention than Miz but when you take into account that Cena has been the face of WWE for the better part of a decade and Rock is among the most popular and relevant stars in the history of wrestling, how could you expect otherwise? Miz was someone that was, comparatively speaking, very recently put into a main event spot and no sane person could expect his star power at that time to rival Cena's or Rock's. As for the heat on Miz, as of now, it seems like a bit of a mixed signal. According to all the dirtsheets, Miz had some heat on him as he was allegedly blamed for the relatively poor buyrate for Survivor Series last year. Still, to this day, I don't see how WWE can blame The Miz for coming off as ineffectual and weak since they'd booked him that way. Why would people want to pay $45 to see Rock & Cena beat up a couple of guys, with R-Truth being the other, that WWE spent the entire build up of the ppv making them look like they wren't even a remote threat to Cena & Rock? Miz deserved heat for what happened with R-Truth, that was just flat out sloppy on Miz's part. Hell, it looked like he deliberately moved out of the way when Truth was going over the top rope. It's also true that Miz has been jobbed out a lot over the past several months but I can't help but wonder why WWE put him into a starring role in one of their movies, namely The Marine 3, if he's so high on their shit list. If Miz's career was truly in the toilet, I don't think this would be happening. It could be a possible relaunch for Miz.

As for the topic of the thread, that's putting FAR too much importance on one single concept. MITB is a popular concept, possibly the most popular gimmick concept in wrestling today, but a failed cash in attempt isn't going to be the end of the world. It's going to happen sooner or later anyhow. I don't think failing after cashing in the MITB briefcase would be anymore detrimental in the grand scheme of things than some of the lackluster title runs that've come about as a result. CM Punk won MITB twice that resulted in two pretty overall mediocre title runs but they don't seem to have been any dead weight on his career. In the grand scheme of things, if anything, they can be viewed as a benefit. Look where Punk is now in his career and how much further he could, potentially, still go. A failed cash in is going to gain someone some notoriety for a while just for the sheer fact that they'd be the first to fail to win the title after cashing in their briefcase. That doesn't have to be the end of the world at all. In TNA last year, Bobby Roode won the BFG Series, yet he failed to win the TNA WHC at the BFG ppv. While a lot of people aren't crazy at all about how that whole situation went down, it hasn't stopped Bobby Roode from being the longest TNA WHC in the history of the company, nor has it slowed him towards possibly becoming the longest reigning champ with any title in TNA history.
 
I can't answer the first two questions, but I can answer the last one.

Say some young face won the briefcase (Ryder, Riley, Cara take your pick) and went to cash it in after a massive heel won/retained the belt (Show, Henry, ADR again take your pick). Have the superstar cash in the briefcase but have the heel champion just roll out of the ring and walk away (after the match has been made official), get themselves counted out but still retain the title.

You could also do the same with a DQ (low blow or grab a chair etc)
 
I would like to see Daniel Bryan vs Cena for the no other reason than, that the company having enough confidence / appreciate for the talent of Byran to put him against "the face".

But I would not want that fued to happen, because i dont want Cena to bury Bryan like he buried, Barrett and the Miz.

I would want Bryan to be in a relevant fued with Cena, and not just a 3 week build up to a ppv, and fodder for superman
 
Ok, hear me out, this may take some explaining, but basically a few years back the Rock was a happy-go-lucky guy, smiling all the time and always nice, then he had enough as we all remember and became a heel in the best way and the rest is history. Losing MIB could be the trigger to switch a long-term heel or face in a massive way similar to this.

Imagine Santino wins MIB, its not out of the question, he was second to last in Royal Rumble not so long back after all, so he wins and then loses when he cashes in in some typically Santino comedic fashion, maybe he cashes in for a PPV to face a Daniel Bryan and by the time the PPV roles around he ends up facing a Wade Barrett or The Undertaker and he loses, he stands no chance.

This isn't really the point though, however it happens he loses and he's a broken man, he got his hopes up and had them crushed and he's unlikely to get another shot ever.

So he leaves the ring, backstage interview and he's really upset and Josh tries to get a few words with the first person to lose the MIB cashing in and he just snaps, explodes and beats the crap out of him and leaves. Surely this from this character would be a total WTF?! moment?

The fact is, this type of face to heel or even heel to face epic switch, it would mean the MIB loss was actually a catalyst for greater things, I was just using Santino as an example, but Brodus Clay?, Kofi Kingston?, even John Cena would benefit in this way.
 
I know he is not in it right now, but I would choose John Morrison. I would have him win MITB and then cash in around Survivor series and get screwed out of the title some how. WWEC or WHC. I would have him then looking for redemption. I would place him in the royal Rumble at number 1 and have him go on to win the Rumble and get a rematch with the Title holder at Mania, where Morrison would finally win and be a WWE or WHC. I think this would be a great story line, perfect for Morrison as a face. It could be a great way for him to build up over half a year to be a main eventer by Mania.
 
This topic immediately made me think of Christian.

1 more match, after a ref "screws him out of a failed count. It'd keep him legitimate, simply because he's had the whiny heel character for nearly a decade now and it fits his character to cry his way into a rematch.

He'd lose barely any steam and it could create an interesting rivalry with any face.
 
I think, wait... I know any character could rebound from a failed MITB cash in. It's wrestling. People don't care or remember what you did last year. It actually hurts the wrestler more if he cashes it in, wins and then stinks up the joint as champion causing the WWE to lose faith in him and leaving him with a stigma of being a midcarder for life. So if Swagger had failed to win the world title when he cashed it in (And maybe not suck so bad in every possible way.) there might still be hope for him.
 
A lot of pros and cons from this topic. The only way this could work, is if the Money in the Bank winner claims his title shot in an actual match, then loses the match.

Having someone come out, and beat a man after he has been in a match, then losing to that guy shows how weak you are. Now again, I just realized... Sanito would be the guy who could do that. I don't take him serious. Have him lose his MiTB opportunity.

He would recover just fine, because a lot of people don't take him serious. Would recover from there, then win make the US title look like trash.

Hell, he will still the make the Hall of Fame before Macho Man. So that's the guy that could recover.
 
I'd say let it be done by someone that you want to lead the company into the future and this be the catalyst for that persons eventual rise to the top.

The perfect person that comes to mind for me is Dolph Ziggler. Dolph still being the show off, comes to cash in against someone like Orton who has a quick finisher, Ziggler works him over for a bit then RKO lights out. This leads to Ziggler blaming Vickie for having him cash in at the wrong time and ditches her and causes him to crave the title. Leading up to a face turn, long run in RR where he falls just short and then have him go bell to bell in an elimination chamber # 1 contenders match. Finally winning the title at WM against a monster heel.

The crowd wants Ziggler to get the title, No Way Out showed that. He has earned a chance at the top and is one of the best in ring performers in the company. Most people expect him to win MITB and successfully cash it in. The shock alone would be great for allowing a great heel, turn face, due to the frustration with the way things have been going for him and really put the crowd behind him.
 
The OBVIOUS choice for person who would win the MITB match and fail after cashing it in is simple......Dolph Ziggler. Everytime it looks like he may just pull off a BIG win and get some gold, they feed him to a face. Ultimatly he would have recovered and be given another title match.......when someone gets injured and they needed a quick replacement
 
yeah someone could recover from a failed cash-in depending on why it failed. if the champ was heel and the winner of MITB was face, you could get a situation where the champ gets himself disqualified or has people come out and they put the beat down on the guy cashing in the MITB. this wouldn`t necessarily hurt the guy. problem is that usually they cash it in when the champ is already down so if you do cash it in and lose, it does make you look like you can`t win the big one. even planning a one-on-one match at say a ppv and losing might not hurt the guy depending on who it is but if it is someone new who you are trying to get to the main event picture, you pretty much have to let them win the match. as for comic winners like Ryder and Santino, yeah they could lose and no one would care. but that`s the point - why would you let either of these guys win when no one would care if they lost and no one would believe it if they won. remember Khali winning the World Title? went over well, didn`t it. having a joke winner like Santino would go over about as well. depending on who is your champ, i could see them calling out Santino the next night and daring them to cash it in. whoever wins needs to be somewhat believable or else the concept is a joke.
 
To say that Miz didn't benefit much from MITB is a ludicrous statemen. Sorry man, but it really is. The Miz had a significant spot within the main event scene in WWE, he had one of the longest World Championship reigns we've seen in WWE for several years now, he was featured prominently against huge stars like John Cena & Randy Orton and, yes, main evented WrestleMania. I agree that Rock & Cena got more attention than Miz but when you take into account that Cena has been the face of WWE for the better part of a decade and Rock is among the most popular and relevant stars in the history of wrestling, how could you expect otherwise?

While I agree with what you're saying, I hardly find saying The Miz winning Money in the Bank AGAIN, and then losing it to go on with what I said, is a ludicrous statement given the following. His main event staying power, was virtually non-existent. Yes, he took the title from Orton, and they bounced about a few times and The Miz kept the championship, though in my eyes was never a believable main eventer. Continuing on, he entered his feud with John Cena, which once again, is great. WWE did everything to give The Miz a rub and get him as over as possible. However his prevalence in the main event scene quickly began to flounder. In less than a year he went from Money in the Bank, to winning the main event of WrestleMania and back into mid-card obscurity. The point of my statement had nothing to do with what you're honing in on; no disrespect intended.

My statement was built off the notion of how far he's slipped that stems into developing a character and moving on. I was speaking in theoretical terms, pushing the notion of The Miz or Jack Swagger being guys who could have established themselves MORE SO via losing, and using that as a catapult to overhaul characteristics like intensity. Because in my opinion, neither of the guys are believable, and they were in my eyes, transitional champions, even if they held their titles for elongated periods of time. Due to them honestly in my opinion, not feeling as though they were main eventers; whilst holding a championship. I think they're two people who deserved more build than an instantaneous championship run, where they struggle to make it on their own steam.

I appreciate the response nonetheless, though. Love talking some wrestling with an intelligent peer. :D
 
This is an excellent thread. I think many of us often sit around wondering when and if someone is going to cash in a lose ... and all of us think it will happen eventually.

I think the FIRST time someone blows it and loses could actually be a huge thing for building someone. After that it won't be "the first person to blow it" storyline, but for the first person it could be a fantastic way to launch someone into a redemption storyline where they desperately struggle to win and be remembered for winning instead of blowing the title.

Unfortunately it would almost have to be an established guy already, because it would significantly hurt someone like Rhodes or Ziggler in my mind.

Who could you see winning the briefcase and failing on the cash-in?
It would have to be someone who has already had a solid mid-card and main event back-and-forth type of career. Could easily be someone like Kane or Big Show, but that seems like a waste of something like the MITB. For anyone other than a Kane or Big Show type, there would have to be a HUGE build up to the MITB cash-in and a close loss in an epic match. That would help get whomever it is over without throwing the strap on them.

Could this "character" still seem legitimate after failing, or would it haunt them?
Part of the story would have to be that it haunts them. Even a Kane or a Big Show would have the rest of the careers being labeled the guy who first blew the MITB opportunity. It would be a solid thing to build around for these guys. With the right storyline, it could easily build on itself with redemption as the selling point.

How would you book a failed cash-in?
As I said ... it has to be a solid build up with a close and fantastic match leading to a loss. I don't see any hot-shot cash in failure as being something that could be recovered from. But I definitely could be wrong. Who knows? It will come at some point.
 
Well yes everyone on the roster could recover from a MITB cash in, it all depends on the nature of what they do with the wrestler next.
The likes of Cena can rub it off by winning the title
The likes of Santino are joke characters and can easily be forgotten about, much like it is hardily mentioned he holds the quickest elimination at the Rumble unless it is the Rumble itself.

With that, you could have the situation where lets say Cody/Ziggler/Barrett cash it in at the Royal Rumble event, lose the match but then go on to win the Rumble. A failed cash in but a main event place at Wrestlemania in one night, a quick recover. You can build the whole feud based on the failed cash in and getting revenge for it by taking the title at the biggest stage. Although that would mean an actually build up of a feud and the title actually meaning something, so this wont happen.
 
Daniel Bryan recovered from the big WM loss greatly, in my oppinion in the months following outshining Sheamus who actually won the match. So if creative could back whatever character fails a Money in the Bank cash-in like Bryan was backed, than recovery could be easily done, with the character maybe benefitting
 
His name is John Cena. If Cena can lose at SummerSlam, lose at Survivor Series, lose at Royal Rumble, and lose and WrestleMania, and still be the face of the company, losing the Money In The Bank match or even losing the Money In The Bank cash in won’t hurt him one bit. I think former WWE World Champions can’t be seriously affected by a failed cash in, unless they are booked that way. Now a SuperStar who has never won the Big Ones may have a harder time, but that’s the gamble they will have to take one day. Just take a look at the Royal Rumble Winners who went on to lose at WrestleMania. No big deal when it comes down to it, but it will be history making when it does happen.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,848
Messages
3,300,881
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top