Jack-Hammer
YOU WILL RESPECT MY AUTHORITAH!!!!
I just don't see CM Punk winning this match. I think it'll be a great match, I just think the two of them will have great chemistry, but I just don't see it. Now, we may all be shocked come Breaking Point as it's always possible the Undertaker just might tap out. Never say never in wrestling, after all.
However, it's just something that's difficult to imagine the Undertaker doing. The scenario I'm hoping comes about involves neither of them coming out of the match with the title but with each having some sort of legitimate beef for as why the other guy shouldn't have it. I'd sort of like to see Punk placed in Hell's Gate and be in it for a while all while struggling to get to the ropes or to position himself as to where he has his hand or his foot underneath the ropes, which means the hold is supposed to be broken. However, the ref is so focused on asking Punk if he's ready to give it up that he doesn't notice that Punk's under the ropes. Now, of course, as Punk is in pain and is probably in a state of panic that the hold isn't being broken sees no choice but to tap. Ref calls for the bell, gives the strap to Taker and Taker is about to celebrate.
However, another ref comes out or maybe even Teddy Long himself does and declares he has no choice but to void the decision. He could make a little statement that it wouldn't be the fair thing to do to restart the match because Punk isn't in the shape to continue because he was held in the hold for much longer than he should've been and he shouldn't be held accountable for referee errors. Long, not being sure what to do, declares the match a draw, the title vacant and will make a choice as to what to do about all this on the next Smackdown. Build up the feud for the HIAC ppv, give both Punk and Taker reasons for why they felt they were robbed at Breaking Point and just keep escalating the feud over the weeks.
However, it's just something that's difficult to imagine the Undertaker doing. The scenario I'm hoping comes about involves neither of them coming out of the match with the title but with each having some sort of legitimate beef for as why the other guy shouldn't have it. I'd sort of like to see Punk placed in Hell's Gate and be in it for a while all while struggling to get to the ropes or to position himself as to where he has his hand or his foot underneath the ropes, which means the hold is supposed to be broken. However, the ref is so focused on asking Punk if he's ready to give it up that he doesn't notice that Punk's under the ropes. Now, of course, as Punk is in pain and is probably in a state of panic that the hold isn't being broken sees no choice but to tap. Ref calls for the bell, gives the strap to Taker and Taker is about to celebrate.
However, another ref comes out or maybe even Teddy Long himself does and declares he has no choice but to void the decision. He could make a little statement that it wouldn't be the fair thing to do to restart the match because Punk isn't in the shape to continue because he was held in the hold for much longer than he should've been and he shouldn't be held accountable for referee errors. Long, not being sure what to do, declares the match a draw, the title vacant and will make a choice as to what to do about all this on the next Smackdown. Build up the feud for the HIAC ppv, give both Punk and Taker reasons for why they felt they were robbed at Breaking Point and just keep escalating the feud over the weeks.