Batista vs. The Undertaker | Page 5 | WrestleZone Forums

Batista vs. The Undertaker

It's not the 80's. I serously doubt they would have a DQ finish in one of the main event's at Mania. Maybe at a 'B' show or the Rumble etc. But W.M. is the most hyped event of the year.
 
gee, lets see how many moves did you forget, umm, how about Triangle choke, dragon sleeper, last ride, then of course you always have the basics such as suplexes, DDTs, and big boots, by the way how many moves does Batista have, umm sit down powerbomb, spinebuster, and then we just move over to the basics, once again suplexes and shit, don't get me wrong I don't have a problem with you being a Batista fan, I just don't understand how you could think he's better than Taker, Taker is by far the better wresstler and it is easy to see that just look at his matches over the years, hell just this last year he had a great feud with Kennedy, see the problem with Batista is that he suffers from Ultimate Warrior syndrome, he thinks he's the biggest thing in sports entertainment, and he clearly isn't, on the other hand Taker is ONE of the biggest things in this business, and he is also on of the guys his willing and ready to help young talent, like other greats, such as Foley, Flair, and Terry Funk, Batista from everthing I've heard is an asshole, hell my 12 year old cousin was a Batista fan until he went to a house show that Batista was working and the happen to see Batista outside and my cousin went up to ask for his autograph and Batitsa told him to "Go Away", when my uncle set in to try and get the autograph Batista told him to "Fuck Off", then he just walked away, and of course as you can imagine My cousin Hates Batista now, personally I think Batista is one of the most overratted guys in the business today, If you like him then fine but seruiosly I can't wrap my head around why you could possiably think Batista is better than Taker in any way

I can't beleive any wrestler would be so up their own ass, he is well aware that fans talking on the internet don't think he should be a main eventer. I think he is determined to prove them wrong andput on a great show with the Undertaker. I don't dislike taker, have a massive amount of respect for what he's done over the years just never seen him as a top guy like shawn, bret, rock and foley. Doesn't anyone think his streak should have ended against Orton or HHH?
 
Smackdown gets it up the ass again. The Streak vs Championship is bigger than the Cena vs Michaels match therfore it should be the main event.

and no dbr Taker's streak shouldn't have ended to Orton or Triple H
 
I think the only reason Taker and Batista isn't the main event is because it would mean 2 raw matches in a row and then the smackdown match and they never usually have 2 of the same brands following each other.
 
Well this match was surprisingly really good but it was weird watching it go fourth on the card.It is for the World Heavyweight Title first off, and second off it is Undertaker.Why would you put him low on the card?Anyways, they had a nice table spot.
 
Whatever happened to winning the royal rumble means you main event wrestlemania?
 
Well the match was pretty crap, thats why it wasnt the main event. Batista was carryed (kicking and screaming) by taker in that match. I think Batista did about 5 moves in the match, thats 1 more than Cena in the main event... HBK/Cena was the better match (thanks to HBK) so taker/batista deserved to be lower down in the card. I just really hope they dont have a rematch at Backlash!
 
McMahon really screwed up Mania this year, seriously why would you put Balltle of the Bitches AFTER a match that we actually paid to see. Undertaker won the Rumble, what ever happened to the Rumble winner headlining WM. But either way I'm sure everyone is happy that Taker won the match and the Phenom's streak lives on
 
Apparently after Undertaker won his World Title Match over Batista last night he was seen speaking to the referee. When fans went back and replayed that segment it looks like Undertaker is saying "Get him out of here", referring to Batista. It's likely that 'Taker wanted the moment to himself and didn't want Batista in the ring during his post title win celebration.

funny even Taker can't stand to be in the same ring with Batista, I'm sure their will be a rematch but hopefully they won't carry this feud out as long as they were originally planned

just a thought but maybe Taker/Batista went on fourth because they wanted to punish Batista for his Ultimate Warrior syndrome, and unfortuntlly Taker was just in the wrong match at the wrong time
 
This match was the match of the night, Undertaker won the royal rumble and deserved the main event spot. The Cena match was not a good match, just another put Cena over a cornerstone of the business match. Just dispicable booking by WWE here
 
I can't believe how early it was on, it must have been McMahon's way of punishing Batista surely? I thought it was a really good match, much better than the main event - shame about the ending in both matches!
 
I dont think it was on too early.

For one. Everyone know's the REAL main event was the Battle Of The Billionaire's. And Vince's boy is Cena. You could'nt have Batista/Taker, Cena/HBK & Lashley/Umaga one after another. By the main event the crowd would be absolutley fucked.
 
I was dissapointed that the match was put there.Most of us paid for the ppv to see Taker win(and Kennedy of course) HBK/Cena should only have been the mainevent if HBK was going to win,because usually WM endings leave fans feeling satisfied& happy(WM20,21etc) But for last two years we are left with a feeling of unease and being pissed(because of Cena)
Batista/Taker was a decnt match.Even if Dave didnt pop any germans,I still think people would rather have left Detriot with an image of Taker on one knee holding up the WHC as opposed to Cena crying in the ring.
 
im just wondering why everyone thinks this was match of the night? I thought it was awful, worse than the CEna/HBK match. Either I missed something or well i dont kno to me the match sucked. In fact it was the worse match of the night imo obviously excluding the squash matches (Khali, Melina)
 
I have'nt seen it on T.V. yet so I cant really judge. But there it came across as the best match of the night. Batista actually looked capable in the ring. It didnt really look like Taker was doing all the work.
 
I have to agree with the match being on too early. I knew vince would give Cena the final match even when it was the least hyped IMO. I understand a lot of people dont respect Batista and believes that he doesnt deserve to be the main eventer of smackdown. But i love the guy and i think he deserves more credit. When I see Batista out in the ring i can really see that he loves being out there with the fans. He is what he is and that is a big muscle but I think he works well for what hes got. Look at Goldberg, spear jackhammer .. worked for him. Batista deserves more credit then all the bashing and even though im a huge Batista fan, im glad that he did the job for the undertaker. To me that was the 2nd best match of the night and I believe that Batista held his own. Batista showed everyone that he deserves to be up there.
 
wow .. comon.. too early? you guys dont know shit.. of course main event match bla bla bla... 4 hours of wrestling ... hummmm.. wonder what to do.. obviously put a main event at the 2 hour mark, makes perfectly good sens and to be honest that match was 100000 times better than i thought it would.. like somebody said.. batista actually looked good on that match. that match kept me sitting infront of the tv instead of going for another joint in the other room. IMO.. best wrestlemania in couple years.. khali and melina match were boring... the rest was just amazing.. when mr kennedy entered, took the mic.. i got chills it was so intense.. we knew who was suppose to win for most the matches. BUT i was still on the edge of my seat the whole night wondering if UT was gonna loose or it HBK would win.. like Batista and UT said.. there match stole the show.. big time! peace

and btw.. did anybody feel uncomfterble after edge got hurt at MITB.. i know i felt kinda weird like if the crowd thought it was another owen hart moment :S.. im glad he's fine!
 
Well I'm the biggest Undertaker fan around here so first I glad that he shut all the critics up. People were always saying "he's getting to old, he hasn't accomplished as much as he should have (grand slam winner, KOR winner, royal rumble winner, only main eventing a WM one time) he's gonna lose to Batista." For one Taker never needed the IC championship or a KOR title because those are like stepping stones and he never needed a stepping stone because when he debuted, he rose to the top within months and has stayed there. He finally won a rumble and main evented another WM beating Batista. So He shut everyone of you up! And then you talk about the negatives, but look at his positives: He's never submitted, The only person ever undefeated at WM, 1st man to enter the rumble at no. 30 and win, only one who's defeated The Great Khali, Been in 7 HIAC matches and has survived, captured the WCW and WWE tag titles at the same time, He's beaten everyone he's been in the ring with,He's been screwed more than anyone and he doesn't complain, Been a main eventer for 17 yrs. and still whooping ass-he's done it all. He's pretty much passed Hulk Hogan when you think of "wrestling." The Undertaker is the man, a true Phenom!

Now as far as WM, I was disappointed that the Batista/Undertaker match wasn't last. Undertaker won the rumble so therefore the Cena/HBK match should have been in that spot. Now the Taker/Batista was good! It wasn't the best match ever, but it was a whole hell of a lot better than I thought it would be. It was actually better than his match wit Sid at WM 13. I actually recorded WM and when I watched it over it did look like he told the ref to get Batista outta here. I think the only reason that match wasn't last was because Vince didn't want the fans to be left without a "hype" celebration like John Cena could deliver and he's just putting Raw over once again as he always does.
 
Well I'm the biggest Undertaker fan around here so first I glad that he shut all the critics up. People were always saying "he's getting to old, he hasn't accomplished as much as he should have (grand slam winner, KOR winner, royal rumble winner, only main eventing a WM one time) he's gonna lose to Batista." For one Taker never needed the IC championship or a KOR title because those are like stepping stones and he never needed a stepping stone because when he debuted, he rose to the top within months and has stayed there. He finally won a rumble and main evented another WM beating Batista. So He shut everyone of you up! And then you talk about the negatives, but look at his positives: He's never submitted, The only person ever undefeated at WM, 1st man to enter the rumble at no. 30 and win, only one who's defeated The Great Khali, Been in 7 HIAC matches and has survived, captured the WCW and WWE tag titles at the same time, He's beaten everyone he's been in the ring with,He's been screwed more than anyone and he doesn't complain, Been a main eventer for 17 yrs. and still whooping ass-he's done it all. He's pretty much passed Hulk Hogan when you think of "wrestling." The Undertaker is the man, a true Phenom!

Now as far as WM, I was disappointed that the Batista/Undertaker match wasn't last. Undertaker won the rumble so therefore the Cena/HBK match should have been in that spot. Now the Taker/Batista was good! It wasn't the best match ever, but it was a whole hell of a lot better than I thought it would be. It was actually better than his match wit Sid at WM 13. I actually recorded WM and when I watched it over it did look like he told the ref to get Batista outta here. I think the only reason that match wasn't last was because Vince didn't want the fans to be left without a "hype" celebration like John Cena could deliver and he's just putting Raw over once again as he always does.

Amen!... well said !!
 
All the wrestling fans are so idiotic geeeeeeeez they amaze me how stupid they are UnderFaker will lose his belt to Batista! It was a favor given by McMoron himself to allow him to have the title for one month but noone is happy after the screwjob Batista received as many as 80% cheered for Batista and noone wanted this to happen! I would have very much prefered if John ********er Cena lost his title instead of Batista
Where does Wrestlemania come out like this with ONE TITLE CHANGE
instead of 2 ???? It is so ridiculously planned it gave Mc Moron the satisfaction for him to cash in on us wrestling fan suckers again!
UNDERTAKER YOU SUCK SHIT and so do you JOhN Cena ********ing McMoron
so as for the rest of you rest assured that Batista retains his title at BACKLASH and HBK willwin it also
I would have preferred HBK winning than the Underfaker old man who is 50+
yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwn what a crappy WM it was
Only thing interesting as Justinightmare911,Y2KRIS and many others predicted that Ken Kennedy was money in the bank so he will face Batista
or Ken Kennedy wins the belt of Undertaker and Batista gets it back !!!
LOL suckas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Thats right justinshitt it was HELL IN THE CELL MATCH couldn't recall the ppv name that Batista beat HHH in a steel cage match since HHH never lost a steel cage match that answers your question and its on wrestlezone birdbrain the wrestlemania revenge tours it happened last year and nothing was changed we all knew HHH would not win over J.C for the title why?
The houseshows gave it away and the posters where HHH had no title on his waist and if you payattention idiot Underfaker abandoned Batista 2 on NO WAY OUT and RAW and not the other way around!
Why he cannot focus on a tag team title neither with his tag team partners
he surely will not focus on a heavyweight belt! LOL
If you noticed many booed the Underfaker cause he abandoned him twice
teh intimidation tactics he pulled on Batista
]
Taker chokeslammed him a couple weeks agao on SD before so he got back at him at NWO to show he was not intimidated. and again he did it on RAW by tossing J.C on Batista leaving him alone to defend himself so you get your story str8 you 9 yo Mark !!

hmmm I suprised Justinsayne is still a registered user and not banned since he started a feud with Y2KRIS I see this user playing favorites with the Wrestlezone admins! Why is almost every person user banned here thsi IS FUCKING USA we all use profanites! so whats the fucking problem?
I don't get it! Like profanities will hurt me if someone insults lol on the contrary you talk back and you shut them up!
 
[QUOTE=Becool420;154070]Amen!... well said !![/QUOTE]

Well Money Marc Underfaker didn't shut up critics he will lose the title in 3 weeks coz many Animal fans wanted Batista to win! Come on bro!
We are sick of his gimmick he should fucking retire and fuck off wrestling he has a potbelly he hasn t accomplished anything in wrestling!
He has no moves limited moves he did wow! He is an old fart over 48 yo he should leave Wrestlemania as his last one! McMoron did him a favor and gave him the belt to shut him up and as a thank you for making his wrestlemanias successful thats all when Ken Kennedy actually wins it and Batista faces him after as it was planned ahead of Wrestlemania !
So all teh underfaker fans the marks who know nothing about Wrestling
Batista was a far better man and champion than your gay boytoy JohN Cena Fagboy who is too busy ********ing McMahons pecker !Seems McMahon found someone to do his favors since HBK was hsi main boytoy!
I would have love to see John Cena lose and HBK gain the title then see Underfaker win over Batista any time of day so it was the worst wrestlemania to go down in history and McMahon finally got his buyrate and once again suckered all us wrestling fans to view this crappy ppv!

I wish WCW was still around they gave better ppvs an dbetter matches!
 
^ would like to know exactly were exactly u got the idea that Taker was 48... las time i checked he was 42....and Batista is 38..

Funny how u say all Undertaker fans know nothing about wrestling, when you try to sprout off that Undertaker has achieved nothing... havent paid much attention over his career have you??

I agree with you that Kennedy will win the strap along the road, but I pray to god that he doesnt face Batista as we have seen that so many times over the past year. To me Batsita really needs to turn heel to freshen things up.

But I do agree with getting the belt off Cena, im sick of all his stuff.
 
Big fan of Batista but fealt sick when Cena retained! If the deadman gets the belt back howcome Michaels doesn't? Anyone reckon McMahon wants Cena to go undefeated at mania? I can't believe Michaels jobbed to him, shocking.
 
The Gold is all screwed up. We all know that 'Taker never sticks around very long after 'Mania, so he will have to lose the gold pretty soon. Cena has been champion for too long and is overshadowing the other talent on Raw. Lashley is a good champion, but not on a brand that represents a hardcore industry. He should be on Raw or Smackdown and win a more legit heavyweight title. Smackdown needs a more permenant champion, NOT BATISTA! Raw needs a fresh champ who isn't a wigger. ECW needs a Hardcore champ, like Sabu or RVD.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top