If Batista says he's clean then he is. Gosh I don't know what it is with this forum that you all like to bash Batista. I know you're jealous of him but lay off of him. Just because he has a body that u guys can only dream of having does not mean he's on anything. I know that when he sues those stupid people for putting his name on that list he'll win. Also if you do not like him and think he's on steriods why should it matter to u just shut the hell up. Besides he does not need to prove anything to u losers anyway.
If you are as young and naive as you sound, AMC21, part of me hates to break it to you, but it must be done... public figures have a tendency to lie about their transgressions, even at times when all evidence points to their guilt (example: The case of Senator Craig resigning after getting caught for solicitation in a restroom this week). A few months back, Ken Kennedy said he did not do steroid, yet we find he's been taking three different suppliments in the past year. While I am not saying Batista is necessarily guilty, the truth is that it's hard to take anyone's word these days, especially when it comes to the media.
As for suing the media, historically, it's bad move. This will only lead to closer scrutiny, and while he may be found innocent of this charge, they could easily drag an unrelated skeleton from his closet that could tarnish his career. Also, back in 1967, Mick Jagger sued an English newspaper, who falsely quoted him as taking LSD. Within weeks, he was busted for drug possession (not LSD) at Keith Richard's home. He ended up pleaing guilty to the charge, and it hampered him being able to enter some countries. So while it may be possible to clear his name of this charge, Batista better be ready for some skeletons from his closet to emerge if he pursues this.
As for many of us criticizing Batista, his body isn't the sole reason. The reasons include his wrestling skills (frequent botched moves and the inability to carry a match without a successful veteran), his promo skills (his monotone and emotionless delivery coupled with unmemorable phrases and contrivances), his backstage attitude (arrogance and an undeserved sense of superiority, even after Booker T got the upper hand in their real life conflict), and his entrance (does anyone else find the whole machine gun pose for lack of a better word... lame?). As for his body, there's a difference between a cut physique and a muscle bursting monster. I have no qualms giving props to a wrestler with a tremendous and well-maintained physique. However, when someone has an abundance of bulging veins, back acne, and they come back from a crippling injury as large or larger than they were before, suspiscion of some body enhancement will naturally arise. If Batista's skills and image go beyond his freakish physique, he should lose some weight and muscle mass so he can be more mobile in the ring, and therefore be a better wrestler. History shows that men with similar physiques frequently have mobility and health issues once they retire (sometimes before).
I am not jealous of Batista's physique, and I doubt anyone in here is. As for him not needing to be prove anything to us, perhaps you're right in the short term. However, when his career comes to an end (which will likely be sooner than later if he continues in the direction he's going health and ambition wise), we are going to be the people who determine his ultimate legacy and his hall of fame induction. If he wants short term success from short term wrestling fans, than he's already attained his goal. Whoever, to the wrestling fans as opposed to entertainment fans, he will never be a legend and his legacy, or lack there of, will be forgotten when he walks through those ropes that last time.
Think before you type next time, AMC21. And also, read some quotes from former wrestlers regarding steroids and indication of use in a wrestler's appearance (Hulk Hogan did a great interview recently where he went into detail, which was quite inciteful considering he was very forthcoming regarding his former use) and you might get a clue where we draw our accusations from.