If he were to turn heel then what are the options? Bryan winning at EC would be stupid but I'd accept it. Bryan vs Batista could be a good combination. Cena/Batista has been done before and he is set to face Wyatt. .
Why? Putting over a man into a main event, championsip match at Wrestlemania who is the most over face the company has had since the early John Cena days is stupid? I'm not sure I understand the logic.
Batista seemed completely shocked by the reaction he received. I fully believe he expected the crowd to welcome him with open arms once he eliminated Roman Reigns, but when boos came raining down, Batista didn't know what to do. So, like the professional that he is, he gets into altercations with fans and mocks them by doing Yes! chants with his middle finger.
If I'm WWE, I turn Batista heel
now. He's done nothing to establish himself as a face, has he? So with that being said, I go with the heel turn right away. Bryan wins the Chamber, Orton has the rematch clause, Batista the main shot, and as much as I loathe the idea of a 3-way for the championship, I think it's the direction WWE needs to go in.
WWE needs to act as if they knew this would happen, and make Batista a heel now. When you look at the recent success rate of Rumble winners who haven't won the title at 'Mania, there's a list of Hall of Famers and rising stars who have failed.
Batista, as a heel, needs to be the next one to do it. He and Orton ang up on Bryan, but like Rock vs. HHH and Undertaker, miscommunication allows Bryan to hit the Bugaizi knee or lock in the LaBell Lock for the win.
If I'm WWE and I turn Batista heel now, then his actions on Sunday, at least by some fans, will simply be seen as part of his act. If you delay the turn and go with just Batista vs. Orton as your main event, the fans are going to be all over it, worse then they were at the Rumble.
Turn him now. There are no top heels, ones with legitimacy, anyways, and Batista would fit that role nicely.