Recently as most of the IWC know TNA's ratings went up slightly and Matt (probably in character) claimed he and Jeff were responsible. He reportable took some heat backstage for this. It's true the ratings did slightly go up after Matt debuted. However what he failed to mention the same night he debuted Jeff dropped the belt to Mr. Anderson.
In my opinion Anderson had a bigger hand in the ratings increase than the Hardys did. This weeks rating went back down slightly on the first show after Jeff won the title back. I don't think these slight changes in the ratings will make or break TNA.
Since Jeff has been in TNA many in the IWC believe his ring work and promos haven't been on the same level. Only his biggest marks will argue differently.I personally like Jeff but I haven't been impressed with him lately. I've never been the biggest fan of Matt. He's a descent wrestler but not a maineventer.
Do you think people are turned off by Jeff's on going court case? Matt's odd twitter and you tube videos or both?
In my opinion Anderson had a bigger hand in the ratings increase than the Hardys did. This weeks rating went back down slightly on the first show after Jeff won the title back. I don't think these slight changes in the ratings will make or break TNA.
Since Jeff has been in TNA many in the IWC believe his ring work and promos haven't been on the same level. Only his biggest marks will argue differently.I personally like Jeff but I haven't been impressed with him lately. I've never been the biggest fan of Matt. He's a descent wrestler but not a maineventer.
Do you think people are turned off by Jeff's on going court case? Matt's odd twitter and you tube videos or both?