A Very Regal Three Hour RAW: King Of The Ring LD - 11/29/10 | Page 47 | WrestleZone Forums

A Very Regal Three Hour RAW: King Of The Ring LD - 11/29/10

A few months back I'd have agreed with you. Morgan was inconsistent on the mic and in the ring. He seems to have put it together recently and it has been no big secret that he has always had a ton of potential.
 
Raw was freaking awesome, totally loved it. Too lazy to look back, but did any catch me on TV? I know for sure that I was on in the intro they do 5 minutes before the show, not sure if I appeared again.

EDIT: If you saw a Josh Cribbs Cleveland Browns jersey (or ya know my beard) it was most definitely me.
 
Raw was freaking awesome, totally loved it. Too lazy to look back, but did any catch me on TV? I know for sure that I was on in the intro they do 5 minutes before the show, not sure if I appeared again.
Don't say that. If you say it was awesome, Coco will give you shit and say that you're a shareholder (yes, he called me one because I disagreed with the notion that Miz is being booked as a weak champion, when in actuality they are just booking him like a heel champion, using everything to his advantage.

I didn't notice you Theo, but I honestly forgot you were going until just now, and didn't look for you.
 
Stormtrooper, Christ, take out your batteries for the night. Enough's enough. How is Miz not looking weak? He almost lost to someone who gets the senior discount at IHOP. He needed like 4 people to help him.
 
Stormtrooper, Christ, take out your batteries for the night. Enough's enough. How is Miz not looking weak? He almost lost to someone who gets the senior discount at IHOP. He needed like 4 people to help him.
simple. The match type evened the odds. Miz beat the fuck out of him and let King get back into the match by being lackadaisical. As the expert commentator said all it takes in that match type is one little mistake to lose the match. That was the whole going from the top rope to the table on the floor.

How is any of that looking weak? Please explain it to me, since no one yet has ever explained HOW Miz looked weak.

Heel champions either look weak when they lose (Swagger), or look weak when they win (Miz). Give me a fucking break. Miz won the match. He didn't look weak. Never once did Miz break the rules of the match to win, so how is winning fairly being weak?
 
Sheamus (heel) didn't look week. Orton (as a heel) didn't look week. Kane (heel) not week. There goes your little "theory". Miz got the shit beat out of him by Lawler, and needed the help of his cronies to win. How'd he NOT look weak?
 
Sheamus (heel) didn't look week. Orton (as a heel) didn't look week. Kane (heel) not week. There goes your little "theory". Miz got the shit beat out of him by Lawler, and needed the help of his cronies to win. How'd he NOT look weak?
Because Miz had about 90% of the offense in the match, and in a match where 1 thing can lose you the match, Miz got thrown through the table.

Miz didn't get his ass kicked at all. He did the ass kicking, King got a lucky shot, and Miz made sure to win the match with the title. Don't just take my word for it. Take someone's who is all knowing.

Did the Miz/King match make Miz look weak?

Nah. I think people put too much emphasis on this guy looks weak or that guy looks weak. Miz's character has been built up as a guy that is rarely the best wrestler in a match but he finds a way to win. Being successful in a gimmick match where he's vulnerable to something like he was hurt with isn't looking weak.
 
I'll let someone else deal with this. It's a forum, nobody is "all-knowing". No need to suck KB's dick either.
Sarcasm. learn it. Obviously KB isn't all-knowing. He is more knowing then I, and maybe then most people on here though. It's not sucking his dick, it's telling the truth as I see it. He seems to know what he's talking about, and I was just quoting it to show that I'm not the only person who sees through the bullshit being spewed by everyone here (namely the Miz-haters).
 
Morrison is the epitome of overrated.

Thats were I have to disagree. He may come off as overrated to you and a few 'smarks' but lets compare him to sheamus.

Morrison-He has charisma, athletic ability, he can sell and he looks like a champion.

Sheamus promos are about as fun as watching golf on tv. You got dat fella? Sure he is the stereotypical monster and ugly to boot, which makes him a great hoss to throw at Cena. Instead they try to push him down our throats as a viable champion. Yet he has never convincingly sold any injuries, he looks like some random bum from an irish pub, and he botches moves more than John Cena, as near impossible as it seems.

But at the end of the day, regardless of what either of us think, WWE decides its champions, not us.
 
Thats were I have to disagree. He may come off as overrated to you and a few 'smarks' but lets compare him to sheamus.

Morrison-He has charisma, athletic ability, he can sell and he looks like a champion.

Sheamus promos are about as fun as watching golf on tv. You got dat fella? Sure he is the stereotypical monster and ugly to boot, which makes him a great hoss to throw at Cena. Instead they try to push him down our throats as a viable champion. Yet he has never convincingly sold any injuries, he looks like some random bum from an irish pub, and he botches moves more than John Cena, as near impossible as it seems.

I'm not exactly sure where this charisma is you say Morrison has because I don't see it. The guy can put on some good matches but he is absolutely atrocious on the mic. He was actually semi-interesting as a heel but as a face his entire persona changes and makes him completely uninteresting outside of the ring.
 
I enjoyed the show. I was like my 12 year old self watching Jeff vs. Taker in the ladder match. Rooting for King no matter what. Fuck all the bitching. Enjoyable match and I don't care if Miz "looks weak" beating a 61 year old man. Dude won and will go on to win for probably the next 2-3 months.
 
For anyone who says Miz "looked weak" against Lawler, kindly shut your hole. He's a cowardly heel. He can look weak and get away with it. It's actually kind of refreshing to see a heel who has to rely on cheating to win matches. Miz isn't a "bad ass" heel. He's a coward. The match with Lawler worked out fine.
 
For anyone who says Miz "looked weak" against Lawler, kindly shut your hole. He's a cowardly heel. He can look weak and get away with it. It's actually kind of refreshing to see a heel who has to rely on cheating to win matches. Miz isn't a "bad ass" heel. He's a coward. The match with Lawler worked out fine.
I'd shut my hole if you didn't just admit he looked weak.
 
Face champions look like a champion. Unless it is a monster heel then the champion should be cheating to win. Heel I mean.
 
So, had Riley and Cole not been there King would be the WWE Champion. Miz couldn't beat him on his own.

I'm just saying that this is how it comes off to every non smark.

Then Triple H couldn't win against Goldberg, Kane, RVD, and the countless others without Ric Flair during 2003. Heels cheat to win. Edge did it with Lita and Vickie. You are looking way too into this Blue. I highly doubt most of the regular fans thought that King would be champ if Riley and Cole weren't there. They were probably like me, disappointed that King didn't win but glad he beat up Cole.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top