One, Spurs execution forced the issue more.
...which is a coaching thing. Do you not understand how execution is so often related to coaching, especially in a matchup of elite caliber teams/athletes?
Two, sure he could but his PGs disappeared, his best post player is his best ball handler. Wade was missing a lot of makeable shots.
How is that a defense to a poor offensive system? The Heat score because they have super players/athletes...the Spurs scored because they had a superior system.
Three, Beasley didn't earn the trust for the WHOLE regular season and you want to claim he could have been the solution?
The solution? No, I'm saying you have a team with obviously slow and/or tired legs giving up record breaking FG% and a youthful proven scorer on your team...maybe you ought to give him a shot, because it's not like he's going to hurt you on defense.
Four, more zone = suicide against Tony Parker?
Did you even watch the games? I believe the Spurs set at least 3 different records for shooting (% in a quarter, % in a half and % for Finals since shot clock).
At that point you try SOMETHING besides the same thing you've done which obviously isn't working.
Then who else is an 'elite' level coach besides Popavich in your opinion if even a two time champion isn't?
There have been a few besides Pop (Riley and Jackson immediately come to mind) . But Spoelstra isn't.
Was Popavich outcoached 2 years ago against Scott Brooks?
I don't know, don't remember that series. Losing and being outcoached is not the same thing.
But Spoelstra was outcoached.
How about last year in the final?
No, he was not outcoached.
Do you understand what it means to be outcoached?
Do you not see the irony in bashing Spoelstra when comparing him to Pops and then fanboying for Lebron in the Lebron vs MJ argument?
No?
First of all, I'm not "fanboying" for LeBron, I'm using facts. Second of all, the fact you think LeBron vs. Jordan has anything to do with Spoelstra being outcoached is quite funny.
Because it sells as both his fans and haters like to bring up the comparison.
But WHY do they bring up the comparison? Seriously, this is not hard to understand. They bring up the comparison because LeBron is a threat.
Why do you think Kobe suddenly became "a respected veteran" around the time LeBron became the best player in the league? Your ignorance is blinding right now.
They were bashing him for shooting too much. Sounds familiar with someone being bashed for not shooting enough?
What does that have to do with Magic though? Do you not understand the point?
Sorry I don't know all of those names except Brady.
Take my word for it, when Aaron and Maris were chasing Babe Ruth's record, they endured ridiculous amounts of hatred. And why? Because they were unseating a beloved figure...like Michael.
Still a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
No, it's not. It's quite appropriate.
It isn't the fear of diluting MJ's legacy that attract haters. It is simply continued success breed resentment in some fans.
Then why is Michael Jordan not the most hated man in NBA history? He was incredibly successful, yet mostly loved (outside of those cities he constantly defeated).
You're wrong if you're saying a large part of LeBron criticism doesn't come from people wanting to protect Jordan's legacy.