This is the last time I'm going to defend my post so don't bother quoting me any more.
First of all not all of us were "wetting are selfs" to see Sting face Undertaker at Mania I had no desire to see that match two aging superstars that can't move anymore doesn't excite me at all.
Secondly Hardy looks weak because Hardy lost to a guy who hadn't wrestled in four months and is seventeen years older then him. Anderson looks weak because someone he lost to can't beat a rusty aging superstar on his first night back.
Thirdly The Miz doesn't look weak he can actually beat people unlike Anderson and Hardy who combined have lost the title three fucking times in the last month. Miz has defeated Randy Orton three times John Morrison once and the King who happens to be a hall of famer twice how does that make the Miz weak?
Thats real smart you got owned in a argument so you say im not going to respond so dont quote me, yet you finsih your post with a question boy aren't you a smart kid
First the majority of wrestling fans were thats a factual statement so you are the minority, doesnt change the fact the the wresting world wanted to see that match it shows you just how strong the sting character is to have that spot
Second, and for the second time wresting fans, and the wrestling universe does not look at age, I take it you have not been watching wrestling very long when Its Jeff Hardy vs Sting thats what it is Not Jeff Hardy vs a 51 year old. People dont give a rats ass about age when they see a match up, In the eyes of the majority of WRESTLING fans Jeff Hardy lost to Sting simple and plain. Instead you want to go into semantics like a moron, well then Sting was more well rested then hardy, hardy had no clue who his opponent was going to be etc... Thats like saying wow randy orton looked real weak because he lost to HBK you sound like moron, it doesnt matter the age difference or whether they just came back its Orton vs HBK, just like Hardy vs Sting age is a non factor
Anderson lost in a Ladder Match! Its the same as going against undertaker in a casket or inferno match if the finish is clean you are most likely going to lose not because you suck but because their is over a decade worth of time showing how those stars have mastered those matches
[/QUOTE]Thirdly The Miz doesn't look weak he can actually beat people unlike Anderson and Hardy who combined have lost the title three fucking times in the last month. Miz has defeated Randy Orton three times John Morrison once and the King who happens to be a hall of famer twice how does that make the Miz weak?[/QUOTE]
He beat a hall of famer who is 60+yrs old(since age means so much to you) who isnt a WRESTLER sting is a wrestler the king is announcer what dont you get
Edge=wins EC chamber to go to mania
Del Rio= wins Royal Rumble to go to mania
Cena= wins EC chamber to go to mania
Miz= beats commentator to go to mania
The Miz is not proven at all and thats what you dont get he thats why he looks weak thats why out of all 4 he was the least hot streak going into mania so far, and its why people could give a rats ass about him, and everyone is talking about the Rock and Cena.( you hold the most important title in the company and know one is paying attention to you, thats weak)
Hardy is not weak he has beaten HBK,HHH, and Undertaker all clean, he had one of the best matches of the year against Kurt Angle at No Surrender they dont need to make him look strong wrestling fans know he is strong they know what he can do in the ring. Mr. Anderson is the most over star in TNA next to Hardy he was over in WWE he won MITB he doesnt need to prove that he is strong, and both of them come of FARRRRR from weak. Once you are proven you can loss and not look weak and worry about falling off.
Its very obvious you have not been watching wrestling that long and the fact that you think Jeff Hardy looks weak by losing to sting and that the miz looks strong when he had a horrible match with Jerry the king lawler to punch his ticket to Wrestlemania is proof of that.
Now go be a good boy, since you arent going to defend the stupidity of your post