TEIWCSCSAATBHPHASP
Pre-Show Stalwart
SHAGAMANIA 3:16 or Crocker?
I just had a visit to the Prison threads, and having just witnessed the two unpopular posters in SHAGAMANIA 3:16 and Crocker, I am astounded by the absurd amount of anti-Cena threads that Crocker had been making, which was the sole basis why he got put to the Prison threads.
To my knowledge, Crocker is someone who I would see as an overly emotional man-child who rants and rants for endless hours about John Cena this, John Cena that. It DOES in fact get old very quickly, the more we delve into Crocker's anti-Cena thread posts, the more I realize that Crocker probably is someone who's not just passive aggressive, but someone who also would be quick to put up much of a fight, even SHAGAMANIA 3:16 would just laugh and shrug it all off. The general consensus is that nobody seems to want Crocker back on the main forums, because he can't last a streak of threads without criticizing Cena. Somehow Crocker is still on WrestleZone forums, while a certain someone else is no longer a part of WZ.
SHAGAMANIA 3:16 on the other hand, started out as an okay poster because of his sense of humor (which Crocker lacks by the way) but by the end of his tenure with WrestleZone forums that barely lasted even a full year, he did some epic freestyle rhymes Shagz-style. I strangely have to admit that I loved his epic rhymes about Jerry "The King" Lawler, and countless others. It makes me wish Shagz came back and did a freestyle rhyme on Crocker. After I looked at SHAGAMANIA 3:16's final posts, I tried my hardest not to laugh out so loud but deep down, I knew I found Shagz' final posts way more entertaining and more fun than Crocker's entire anti-Cena tirades ever would be. Makes me wish SHAGAMANIA 3:16 was still around on WrestleZone forums instead of Crocker, who could've been banned altogether for refusing to back away from anti-Cena threads without a shred of evidence, logic, reasoning and facts.
But enough of my statements for now. If we ever looked back in retrospect on who out of those two would've made for a better choice than the other, who would you have preferred out of them? If you want the freestyle rhymes to come back, vote for SHAGAMANIA 3:16, or if you want cringe-worthy reactions to more of Crocker's anti-Cena rant threads, vote for Crocker. If not, tell me why you think SHAGAMANIA 3:16 should be re-instated and why Crocker should've been the one that's banned instead of SHAGAMANIA 3:16.
I just had a visit to the Prison threads, and having just witnessed the two unpopular posters in SHAGAMANIA 3:16 and Crocker, I am astounded by the absurd amount of anti-Cena threads that Crocker had been making, which was the sole basis why he got put to the Prison threads.
To my knowledge, Crocker is someone who I would see as an overly emotional man-child who rants and rants for endless hours about John Cena this, John Cena that. It DOES in fact get old very quickly, the more we delve into Crocker's anti-Cena thread posts, the more I realize that Crocker probably is someone who's not just passive aggressive, but someone who also would be quick to put up much of a fight, even SHAGAMANIA 3:16 would just laugh and shrug it all off. The general consensus is that nobody seems to want Crocker back on the main forums, because he can't last a streak of threads without criticizing Cena. Somehow Crocker is still on WrestleZone forums, while a certain someone else is no longer a part of WZ.
SHAGAMANIA 3:16 on the other hand, started out as an okay poster because of his sense of humor (which Crocker lacks by the way) but by the end of his tenure with WrestleZone forums that barely lasted even a full year, he did some epic freestyle rhymes Shagz-style. I strangely have to admit that I loved his epic rhymes about Jerry "The King" Lawler, and countless others. It makes me wish Shagz came back and did a freestyle rhyme on Crocker. After I looked at SHAGAMANIA 3:16's final posts, I tried my hardest not to laugh out so loud but deep down, I knew I found Shagz' final posts way more entertaining and more fun than Crocker's entire anti-Cena tirades ever would be. Makes me wish SHAGAMANIA 3:16 was still around on WrestleZone forums instead of Crocker, who could've been banned altogether for refusing to back away from anti-Cena threads without a shred of evidence, logic, reasoning and facts.
But enough of my statements for now. If we ever looked back in retrospect on who out of those two would've made for a better choice than the other, who would you have preferred out of them? If you want the freestyle rhymes to come back, vote for SHAGAMANIA 3:16, or if you want cringe-worthy reactions to more of Crocker's anti-Cena rant threads, vote for Crocker. If not, tell me why you think SHAGAMANIA 3:16 should be re-instated and why Crocker should've been the one that's banned instead of SHAGAMANIA 3:16.
