Whilst we are on the subject, I believe there is a problem with the championships - that aren't the World or Tag Titles - and that is they don't have a true definition of who can challenge for the titles, and if they do, they aren't adhered properly. What is the difference between the Eurasian and Elite Openweight championships right now? One is held by Titus, and the other is held by Eve Taylor. That's really it, and considering how well Lee and I have been doing recently, how does anyone who isn't a potential World title contender able to defeat us? I understand how people are chosen as challengers, and I understand people can win a championship and get absolutely amazing with the belt, making it hard to challenge for it (a la Sam Smith), but like the brand split notion, there are other alternatives.
I think the Elite Openweight title needs to start adhering to its name, as originally intended in discussions. Make it a television championship, and have it defended on every set of shows, similar to the Mayhem title. Give people who aren't considered for a title shot a chance to win a title; give them something to work towards and hone their skills. Random matches and title contender matches every so often doesn't cut it. It also differentiates the European/Elite titles, and gives a proper tier system. You can also bring back the multi-man matches and throw everyone in an Elite Openweight title match, instead of forcing matches to happen. I know I say this very late in my run, and when I'm performing well, but I think this is the perfect solution.
There are other problems like the quality of feuds, and booking them without following the WWE-style of interference/attacks/interference/attacks on repeat, but this would be a good start to encourage people to join, and keep people around to have a fun experience.
