WZCW Discussion Thread | Page 3094 | WrestleZone Forums

WZCW Discussion Thread

Yeah I thought that part was strange. We've had plenty of high profile females in WZCW, and we just made fun of someone losing to the longest reigning Elite X (sue me, I like Elite X better) champion in history because she's female??

Seems like a major step backwards for a one off line. We've always been perfectly fine with equal genders here so the whole thing was out of character
by what I consider standard here.

Killjoy probably had a rough time using Google translate. Y'know, with him being Mexican and all.

I dont see the problem with him posting a review after he reads it.

I think the review isn't worthy of being posted in the review thread. He had one point in his very short review, but he didn't expand on it. Everything else was 'good job' or 'well done', and these are the sort of responses creative doesn't want, AFAIK. Even if it was well done, specify why so creative knows why it went over well. What he wrote deserved to be in the discussion thread.

Reviewing a review. So meta.
 
Killjoy probably had a rough time using Google translate. Y'know, with him being Mexican and all.



I think the review isn't worthy of being posted in the review thread. He had one point in his very short review, but he didn't expand on it. Everything else was 'good job' or 'well done', and these are the sort of responses creative doesn't want, AFAIK. Even if it was well done, specify why so creative knows why it went over well. What he wrote deserved to be in the discussion thread.

Reviewing a review. So meta.

I'm out of touch with all the latest acronyms, but what in the world is AFAIK?
 
The count of those some people he mentioned is relatively high, that should be his major concern. He just presumes we scrutinise him constantly.
 
Check out the new signature. You'll be seeing a lot of those faces! ;)

You should consider adding a spooky dude.

They like the spooky dudes. Only the great ones can beat the spooky dudes. Especially the really spooky dudes with the spooky red eyes. Only the greats can beat that spooky dude.

Spooky.
 
Why do you have a loss marked in your sig if your character hasn't fought a match yet?
Because my debut loss is assured. :thumbsup:

You should consider adding a spooky dude.

They like the spooky dudes. Only the great ones can beat the spooky dudes. Especially the really spooky dudes with the spooky red eyes. Only the greats can beat that spooky dude.

Spooky.
You just love spooky ones, don't you? ;)
 
I thought Steve Holmes is the leader of the stable! Power struggle eh? Constantine taking all the spot light ;)

He seems more like in the role Flair was in Evolution, which is the real stable I am drawing the most comparison to. Constantine's the Trips, Austin is the Orton while Abel is the Batista.
 
He seems more like in the role Flair was in Evolution, which is the real stable I am drawing the most comparison to. Constantine's the Trips, Austin is the Orton while Abel is the Batista.

You know, I was really surprised to see Constantine joining that stable. Because his RP suggested otherwise; he didn't trust in Holmes. I'll write the show review soon, it has a lot more to discuss and debate about Constantine's alliance with Holmes.
 
He seems more like in the role Flair was in Evolution, which is the real stable I am drawing the most comparison to. Constantine's the Trips, Austin is the Orton while Abel is the Batista.

You nailed it.

You know, I was really surprised to see Constantine joining that stable. Because his RP suggested otherwise; he didn't trust in Holmes. I'll write the show review soon, it has a lot more to discuss and debate about Constantine's alliance with Holmes.

Just because Constantine doesn't trust Holmes, it doesn't mean that he doesn't know the road to the top. Constantine and Holmes have a lot of history but I think, ultimately, both men respect the other and what they can do for each other.
 
If you read that again, it wasn't a review after all. It was just his opinion. And the Meltdown show was viewed only by 50+ viewers by the time he posted his review. Much on the fed hadn't have even read the shows as it was posted on 4 pm Indian time which is by far either 3 am or 5:30 am in USA.

Ok, so because you do not qualify it as a review and it was his opinion, he shouldn't have posted it? Also, I don't really see why he should have to wait.

I agree that it should have been more details on what was good but at least the guy is trying to be involved. You should not discourage him for that.
 
Vee, I have to spread rep before giving you some more. But I will get to it. Thanks for the feedback. I will make a point of addressing some of those issues.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top