WZCW Discussion Thread | Page 2868 | WrestleZone Forums

WZCW Discussion Thread

Soooo this happened in my WWE 2K15 Career mode.

cvCeiEC.jpg

Completely random.
 
I don't know why but I'm not crazy about the Power Rankings. First glance they seem lazily thrown together, as the top 5 are all the big winners from the LL, despite some not performing strong going into the event. On sober second glance, with KO leaving and Tastic and Stormrage becoming one, who else was there to fill the spots. It's all kayfabe so I shouldn't care at all really. I'll chalk it up to Ryder dropping out for the first time :(
 
I don't know why but I'm not crazy about the Power Rankings. First glance they seem lazily thrown together, as the top 5 are all the big winners from the LL, despite some not performing strong going into the event. On sober second glance, with KO leaving and Tastic and Stormrage becoming one, who else was there to fill the spots. It's all kayfabe so I shouldn't care at all really. I'll chalk it up to Ryder dropping out for the first time :(

Well, the idea is to get one list done after every round of shows to reflect the major winners and losers that week. However, the Lottery is very hard to judge. There aren't a great deal of matches so I had to go with people who had strong showings in the Lottery match itself. The previous list also plays a part as it is unfair to drop someone from the number one spot to off the list completely. Especially when, like I say, there wasn't enough "winners£ to fill the list on their own. It was a tough call.
 
Well, the idea is to get one list done after every round of shows to reflect the major winners and losers that week. However, the Lottery is very hard to judge. There aren't a great deal of matches so I had to go with people who had strong showings in the Lottery match itself. The previous list also plays a part as it is unfair to drop someone from the number one spot to off the list completely. Especially when, like I say, there wasn't enough "winners£ to fill the list on their own. It was a tough call.

Like I said before, I shouldn't care. It's a list that more or less is used for kayfabe purposes than grading our own performance. If we're playing off of previous lists, then they absolutely need to count. Zeus lost last round. elegANT has lost 2 straight and was eliminated early in the LL. Scumm has several loses and hasn't beaten anyone on the list. On the other side of that, Hunnicutt beat Daggershield, and had a very strong showing at LL. I guess my biggest complaint is Scumm should've debuted lower and Hunnicutt should've been higher. Aside from that, I can't think of who else should be on the list and who shouldn't. Most of them there had very strong showings at LL. It was a tough call.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top