WZCW Discussion Thread | Page 2371 | WrestleZone Forums

WZCW Discussion Thread

I heard a Game Of Thrones reference?

EDIT - But yeah, Ricky Runn, Krypto and Beard... Pre Kingdom Come who is guessing that? Congrats to all.
 
Killjoy, Vega has had more successful title defenses in one reign than you managed in all yours combined.
Blasphemy!

Constant title defenses don't work in reality (TNA dropped it twice, WWE played it for comedy), they didn't work well in WZCW (since the rule was dropped in Bowen's reign, the number of two round champions dropped like a stone). It makes for a hot potatoed title that benefits nobody. I'm going to cut myself off here before I puss off Creative for shitting on their idea though.

Don't worry about it. I brainstormed a good chuck of it, and it certainly doesn't bother me to hear negative feedback.

And for the record, TNA fucked the TV title harder than a $2 ****e.

The title revamp is meant for a game of hot potato. Why? Because eventually someone is gonna catch lightning in the hand and run with it. You mentioned Vega and Bowen. That's two examples. Sam Smith, Rush and Big Dave are other examples of long running champs. All 3 of those guys were considered the cream of the crop during their reigns as champs but before they could be set up as World title contenders, circumstances doomed them. Big Dave was the only one to win it after a bit and was forced to leave right after. We decided to use these new rules as a failsafe should someone dominate for too long and outgrow his competition. At the same time, we've faced the problem of non-PPV rounds never having title matches. There's another case solved. And should a time come where it's not needed to defend every week, we'll stop.
 
This is the only poster worth mentioning.

333d14w.jpg
 
They are up as well.

For anyone who is wondering, I didn't make a Gold Rush discussion thread because we already have a Gold Rush discussion thread that is perfectly sufficient for use.
 
Blasphemy!



Don't worry about it. I brainstormed a good chuck of it, and it certainly doesn't bother me to hear negative feedback.

And for the record, TNA fucked the TV title harder than a $2 ****e.

The title revamp is meant for a game of hot potato. Why? Because eventually someone is gonna catch lightning in the hand and run with it. You mentioned Vega and Bowen. That's two examples. Sam Smith, Rush and Big Dave [/b[are other examples of long running champs. All 3 of those guys were considered the cream of the crop during their reigns as champs but before they could be set up as World title contenders, circumstances doomed them. Big Dave was the only one to win it after a bit and was forced to leave right after. We decided to use these new rules as a failsafe should someone dominate for too long and outgrow his competition. At the same time, we've faced the problem of non-PPV rounds never having title matches. There's another case solved. And should a time come where it's not needed to defend every week, we'll stop.

The flawed logic here is that my biggest failing on creative was not getting our champs to defend on non PPV matches. Those three are prime examples.
 
At least with the Elite X championship, we'll have a defending champion every round. It's a slow and steady process but WZCW will get there.
 
I think he's got a great RP, but I think he could do with a better rep. Maybe KENTA? Will be great to see him on the roster all the same, new talent is great and it seems he's got a good idea where to go with the character.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top