WWE's New Message? | Page 3 | WrestleZone Forums

WWE's New Message?

I don't understand why quite a few idiots here have been labelling the OP as a "troll" when it's crystal clear he dislikes DB and is even anti-DB, just like I am. What makes it so difficult for you idiots to accept that you go on labelling us "trolls" ? Stop abusing an illogical label for lack of a better argument and no matter what DB does, I cannot wait for him to disappear into the black clouds of obscurity.
 
Yes, one thing that happened one time in extraordinary circumstances is CLEARLY the way everything will happen from this point forward. Jesus Christ.

Also, the WWE will always have a guy with a rich gimmick buy the title after paying a referee to get plastic surgery, every champion will be mugged in Syracuse so they have to give up their title, every time a guy is being kept from the ring he'll drive a zamboni to force his way there, either that or he'll drive a beer/milk truck and spray everybody down. And every a Royal Rumble will end I a draw leading to two title matches at Mania, every triple threat will end in two people pinning the champion and the title being vacated, every champion will retire with the belt, every WWE champion with team up with the IC champion in a two man power trip, there will always be fake weddings that turn out to be real marriages, every feud Kane participates in will lead to somebody pretending to have intercourse with a fake corpse...yep, all of these things are the WWE's new message, it's the way everything will always work from now on, clearly if the WWE does something once that means it's the way forward.

By the way, the WWE isn't giving in to anybody for anything. This was the plan all along, which is why Daniel Bryan tweeted about "the machine" holding him back and his fans being the "Yes Movement" about three minutes after the Royal Rumble ended. The fact that people seriously think he wasn't going to end up in a triple threat for the title all along may be the death of me. I can't even fathom how stupid somebody has to be to not see that this was clearly the plan the entire time. He's in the match against Triple H because CM Punk had to be replaced. What do you people think Bryan would've done at Mania if Punk stuck around and they didn't put him in the title match? Where do you think the storyline of him being held down, and rallying his fans in the yes movement would've lead? Seriously, it makes absolutely no sense.

And finally, back to the OP, how the hell is he not earning his title shot? Did you not hear the part where he has to beat Triple H to get in the title match? How is that not winning his way in? My god. "People have always had to earn title shots by winning matches, and now they're just going to let Bryan earn his title shot by winning a match??? I can't believe this!!! I'm so angry!!!"

People, let this be a lesson. Applying a little common sense and logic before hitting "submit" can go a long way.

No you idiot. The OP damn well understands the logic of that booking and it's exactly that which he opposes. Bryan facing HHH is not the problem but the booking of Bryan as this Underdog never-say-die bum who's going to accumulate his pipsqueak fans and then threaten The Authority into making that match does hurt the OP. It's the stupid YES-movement and its ultimate culmination this past monday into that segment that has disgusted the OP and caused him to hit on "Submit" and quite rightfully so.

Here's what ridiculously better performers have done and not done in the past:-
Brock Lesnar in his prime won the Rumble to face Kurt Angle.
Chris Benoit's 2004 saga.
Even that tiny overrated pipsqueak Rey Mysterio, who should've never contended for a non-cruiserweight title won the royal rumble
Undertaker won the rumble
Numerous others have won the Elimination Chamber to contend for the WWE/WHC.
Batista, John Cena, Edge, etc. won the RR and the latter two did it twice.
Chris Jericho won an even more acclaimed battle royal to face CM Punk in 2012 because they decided to have Sheamus win the rumble instead.

And then there's your abominable hero DB. Week after week ever since Summerslam, this bastard has been shoved down the OP and my throats and our eyesights yearn to see a more credible and believable main-eventer.

Say what you will in defence of your hero but DB is the most disgusting, pathetic, implausible and overrated wrestler to be forcefed as a credible contender to the WHC in a very long time and that's my opinion and it's not going to change.

And the OP has been perfectly logical in his assertions of contempt and disgrace he feels for that Goatfaced cunt to have been given these idiotic scripts of Coercing and using ******ed chants into his way of getting matches, and run with it instead of actually being a great performer or possessing Mic skills and charisma and I just proved it.

When someone like The Undertaker(ministry era) abducts stephanie into getting what he wants, or a beast like Lesnar destroying Mark Henry to coerce the Authority, that's credible. What happened on Raw was nothing but a disgraceful slap and a joke to the entire legacy and history or pro-wrestling, just as DB ever winning the WHC was. There's nothing you can say to contradict. Tell me that a 5-ft-8 idiotic loser threatening an apparent stud like HHH into coercion is Realism and what pro-wrestling should be all about and you're another blind, docile and hypnotized sheep.
 
I don't understand why quite a few idiots here have been labelling the OP as a "troll" when it's crystal clear he dislikes DB and is even anti-DB, just like I am. What makes it so difficult for you idiots to accept that you go on labelling us "trolls" ? Stop abusing an illogical label for lack of a better argument and no matter what DB does, I cannot wait for him to disappear into the black clouds of obscurity.

Are you trying to suggest that people who have a (arguably) unhealthy dislike (when depicted online) for a wrestling persona/actual person cannot also be labeled as the internet buzzword "troll"?

You're suggesting the two have to be mutually exclusive?

You're suggesting that, while there is proof of lots of bias, a person cannot use their anonymity's safety as a way to act like said "troll"?
 
I didn't use any in my point? Huh, because I clearly made all my counterpoints to your reference of HHH and Brock being more popular than Bryan, where did I touch on Cena exactly?

Your "point" is still flawed. And actually, in terms of current events, it could easily be argued (once again currently) that Bryan is more popular than Hogan at this moment in time. People want to see Bryan more than they do Hogan at the moment. People are currently very invested in Bryan, they aren't currently invested in Hogan.

Where's your point again?

This is when I generally just give up on an argument. What you have just said is so illogical and asinine that it really doesn't deserve a response. Common sense would tell you that Hulk Hogan has more fans than DB has or will likely ever have. Maybe you are confused about what the word popular means. Either way, I will no longer entertain this nonsensical debate. I have learned that on this forum, 9 times out of 10 an argument will go absolutely nowhere and be a complete waste of time. If you think that DB is the most popular WWE superstar, than good for you as long as you can back it up BUT there is nothing that leads me to believe that this is true. Chanting Yes is fun, it doesn't always mean someone supports DB, especially at sporting events where most of the people there probably dont know who the hell he is. It only takes about 10-20 people to start a chant and if it looks and sounds fun than others will join in regardless of if they know what, why, and who they are chanting for.

Also people wanting to see DB more than Hogan is not necessarily true. Yes in a WWE ring, of course they want to see DB more because he is an active wrestler and a huge part of Raw and Smackdown. But I'd bet my entire life savings that if both had an autograph session on the same day at the same time, and fans could only get one, than Hogan's line would be triple the size of DB's easily.

I'm done, that was my closing statement. I have nothing left to add to this.
 
This is when I generally just give up on an argument. What you have just said is so illogical and asinine that it really doesn't deserve a response. Common sense would tell you that Hulk Hogan has more fans than DB has or will likely ever have. Maybe you are confused about what the word popular means. Either way, I will no longer entertain this nonsensical debate. I have learned that on this forum, 9 times out of 10 an argument will go absolutely nowhere and be a complete waste of time. If you think that DB is the most popular WWE superstar, than good for you as long as you can back it up BUT there is nothing that leads me to believe that this is true. Chanting Yes is fun, it doesn't always mean someone supports DB, especially at sporting events where most of the people there probably dont know who the hell he is. It only takes about 10-20 people to start a chant and if it looks and sounds fun than others will join in regardless of if they know what, why, and who they are chanting for.

Also people wanting to see DB more than Hogan is not necessarily true. Yes in a WWE ring, of course they want to see DB more because he is an active wrestler and a huge part of Raw and Smackdown. But I'd bet my entire life savings that if both had an autograph session on the same day at the same time, and fans could only get one, than Hogan's line would be triple the size of DB's easily.

I'm done, that was my closing statement. I have nothing left to add to this.

Oh the irony of that bolded statement.

Chanting Yes is fun, it doesn't always mean someone supports DB, especially at sporting events where most of the people there probably dont know who the hell he is

Ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha,

Wait wait.

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Now you're suggesting people are just chanting "YES" because they don't know who Bryan is and so they're going along with the rest of the crowd.

Oh my sides. My God my sides.
 
Are you trying to suggest that people who have a (arguably) unhealthy dislike (when depicted online) for a wrestling persona/actual person cannot also be labeled as the internet buzzword "troll"?

You're suggesting the two have to be mutually exclusive?

You're suggesting that, while there is proof of lots of bias, a person cannot use their anonymity's safety as a way to act like said "troll"?

Oh believe me im not trolling anyone I genuinely hate Daniel Bryan. I have never been entertained by him and odds are I never will be. There are three things that need to happen before I'd ever like Daniel Bryan. 1) Get a better in ring set of moves. 2) Get some better theme music other than that terrible "Flight of the Valkyries" garbage. And 3) He needs to turn heel. But clearly none of these are happening any time soon of perhaps even ever. So until then I will continue to support the Randy Ortons, Batistas, Dolph Zigglers, CM Punks, AJ Styles, etc. of professional wrestling.
 
Oh believe me im not trolling anyone I genuinely hate Daniel Bryan. I have never been entertained by him and odds are I never will be. There are three things that need to happen before I'd ever like Daniel Bryan. 1) Get a better in ring set of moves. 2) Get some better theme music other than that terrible "Flight of the Valkyries" garbage. And 3) He needs to turn heel. But clearly none of these are happening any time soon of perhaps even ever. So until then I will continue to support the Randy Ortons, Batistas, Dolph Zigglers, CM Punks, AJ Styles, etc. of professional wrestling.

Same here. But even as a heel Daniel Bryan, would you really endure a very short and tiny performer that's more suited for an Owen Hart role to weekly be forcefed and petitioned to contend for the WWE WHC? ! Would he be any less annoying as a heel goatfaced clown jumping to the ring chanting YES(something which he's already monotonously done in 2012), looking like a tiny homeless man posing as a pro-wrestler and causing disruption and disharmony amongst the WWE universe?
 
Are you trying to suggest that people who have a (arguably) unhealthy dislike (when depicted online) for a wrestling persona/actual person cannot also be labeled as the internet buzzword "troll"?

You're suggesting the two have to be mutually exclusive?

You're suggesting that, while there is proof of lots of bias, a person cannot use their anonymity's safety as a way to act like said "troll"?

If labelling somebody who apparently seems like a man of unforced unadulterated conviction and resolution in their dislike and disgust for the current product revolving around DB, as a "troll", satisfies you or makes you feel like you've decoded the anti-DB mystery, then by all means revel in this satisfaction.
 
Oh believe me im not trolling anyone I genuinely hate Daniel Bryan. I have never been entertained by him and odds are I never will be. There are three things that need to happen before I'd ever like Daniel Bryan. 1) Get a better in ring set of moves. 2) Get some better theme music other than that terrible "Flight of the Valkyries" garbage. And 3) He needs to turn heel. But clearly none of these are happening any time soon of perhaps even ever. So until then I will continue to support the Randy Ortons, Batistas, Dolph Zigglers, CM Punks, AJ Styles, etc. of professional wrestling.

You just called one of the most recognisable and well-known pieces of classical music garbage.

Now I know you're either a troll or a moron.

Also, Daniel Bryan needs a better in-ring set of moves, and you support BATISTA? Come on.

Also, to everyone saying that Daniel Bryan isn't "believable", I have two things to say to you. 1) Learn how a real fight works. The biggest guy doesn't always win. 2) IT'S ALL FAKE. None of it is believable, but it doesn't matter. That's why we like it.
 
You just called one of the most recognisable and well-known pieces of classical music garbage.

Now I know you're either a troll or a moron.

Also, Daniel Bryan needs a better in-ring set of moves, and you support BATISTA? Come on.

Also, to everyone saying that Daniel Bryan isn't "believable", I have two things to say to you. 1) Learn how a real fight works. The biggest guy doesn't always win. 2) IT'S ALL FAKE. None of it is believable, but it doesn't matter. That's why we like it.

"Flight of the Valkyries" is a classic piece of music but as entrance music? It's extremely underwhelming and it doesn't fit. And where in the world did your two points come from? At what point in time did I bring up real fights and how wrestling is fake? Are you mentioning that it isn't believeable because DB winning all those matches really isnt believeable? Looks like were finally getting somewhere with you.
 
This has gotta be the stupidest thread I've seem in a long time. I've read through the entire thread, every post, and I counted I think 2 people that agreed with the op. Like someone said before, you say Daniel Bryan need to get a new move set because it's garbage, but then you support someone like Batista, who I can prolly work a better match than right now. I at least wouldn't get gassed after 5 minutes of wrestling. I was a big fan of Batista back then, but now he's just absolutely horrible to watch. It's actually quite embarrassing. To say Daniel Bryan needs a new move set and then you support Batista is just downright ignorant. You say you'll only be a fan of him if he turns heel. Typical iwc, to want someone to be heel. Thank god your not in charge of the wwe because it would of been out of business long time ago. Yeah, let's turn the most popular and most over baby face on the roster. Stupid.
The way they inserted him into the HHH match was absolutely brilliant and something very fresh. And you do realize that is scripted right? Bryan didn't just hold up raw because he felt like it. I'm sure Hunter and Bryan sat down and went over what was going to happen and what was going to be said. Your acting like he just did it, and that is the way people are going to get there way now by holding up raw. Your trolling or just very very very (can't put enough very's) stupid and ignorant.
All you prolly do is bitch and moan about how there not pushing new stars, and being more creative with there storylines. Well this angle is about as fresh and as creative as it can get. A lot better than anything I can think of.

Oh and by the way, he is earning his spot into the championship match, by beating HHH. It's just not being given to him.
 
The most disgusting WM season for me as fan. I'm sickened to the marrow, disgusted beyond belief, and tormented beyond all humanly capacity because of one Daniel Bryan and all his fans. I have no other choice but to wish and curse death upon Bryan, and considering how capable of fell evil and remorselessness my soul is, I'd go at quite a length to accomplish that.

However, my life is more important than that pipsqueak. But as a true and loyal WWE fan, I cannot and will not enjoy WM XXX any more for the same reasons I_am_the_champ94 cited.

1-No CM Punk and his eloquent capable self now being replaced by a tiny ,lacklustre performer who's done nothing besides some ******ed monosyllabic apelike chants permeating arenas wherein you sheep get to be part of the so-called YES-movement

2-Grandpa Hogan walking around bombarding my Ears with "Brother" and "Dude" which I don 't really want to see.

3-Bryan abomination. I consider it a given that if HHH/Steph have gone so far entertaining/enduring this pipsqueak's crap, they're probably planning to have him stand victorious with the belt at WM XXX. But I don't actually care about the result of the triple threat because quite frankly, Bryan even getting inserted into it is the biggest disgrace to wrestling ever since Rey Mysterio won the WHC at WM 22. At this point, I'd take The Miz, or a returning John Morrison to be inserted into it.

Disgusting. (And middle fingers to anybody who's going to threaten, challenge, or disparage ME- a person they do not know- because of my loathe of their honoured God Daniel Bryan).

As for champ's point that the WWE truly has changed, whether for good or bad remains to be seen, I'm guessing either they're planning to screw Bryan out of the title(YES, once again), or might go long way with him as a babyface underdog champ just to show Punk the middle finger(maybe it's HHH's idea/plan) in a you-screw-with-us and I-screw-you fashion. Either ways, disgusting WM .

CM Punk left, it happened, deal with it.

Constant bitching is not going to bring him back.

As for everything else, I will probably spend the £18 to order WM XXX on Sky Box Office, but I don't really care, Brock Lesnar will lose, it's the Wyatts' first Mania therefore it's almost a given Bray will beat Cena clean, and I don't care about the Andre the Giant memorial thing.
 
Daniel Bryan has never cried or complained. Neither have his fans. They have voiced their displeasure because he has been screwed over and over again and they want him to get that ultimate pay off of finally winning the title. If WWE really didn't see money or value in Daniel Bryan then they would tell the fans to kick rocks. They've done it in the past. But this time the fans wanted it and they saw money in giving them what they want. If they didn't see dollar signs they wouldn't have made shirts to support the yes movement, or pushed the yes movement on television. You act like Daniel Bryan stomped his feet and the WWE said, "okay there's no value in you as champ but okay her you go we'll give you a big push." No that's not how it works. Using you're logic all the fans that went nuts for Austin up until he got the title were just crying and wining too. Its called fan support and when you get said support and the WWE see's $$$ in it, they go with it.

P.S. stating that you don't like D.Bryan at all before going on you're rant about him and his spoiled brat fans, doesn't exactly give you're opinion too much credibility.
 
This has gotta be the stupidest thread I've seem in a long time. I've read through the entire thread, every post, and I counted I think 2 people that agreed with the op. Like someone said before, you say Daniel Bryan need to get a new move set because it's garbage, but then you support someone like Batista, who I can prolly work a better match than right now. I at least wouldn't get gassed after 5 minutes of wrestling. I was a big fan of Batista back then, but now he's just absolutely horrible to watch. It's actually quite embarrassing. To say Daniel Bryan needs a new move set and then you support Batista is just downright ignorant. You say you'll only be a fan of him if he turns heel. Typical iwc, to want someone to be heel. Thank god your not in charge of the wwe because it would of been out of business long time ago. Yeah, let's turn the most popular and most over baby face on the roster. Stupid.
The way they inserted him into the HHH match was absolutely brilliant and something very fresh. And you do realize that is scripted right? Bryan didn't just hold up raw because he felt like it. I'm sure Hunter and Bryan sat down and went over what was going to happen and what was going to be said. Your acting like he just did it, and that is the way people are going to get there way now by holding up raw. Your trolling or just very very very (can't put enough very's) stupid and ignorant.
All you prolly do is bitch and moan about how there not pushing new stars, and being more creative with there storylines. Well this angle is about as fresh and as creative as it can get. A lot better than anything I can think of.

Oh and by the way, he is earning his spot into the championship match, by beating HHH. It's just not being given to him.

ONCE AGAIN, another reader who cannot understand the point OP tried to make. I'm not going to call you ignorant, dumb, or use any other demeaning adjective which should rightfully be adorned to you right now. That sort of shit suits the majority on here who resort to demeaning adjectives because they fail to understand things.

We damn well KNOW it's scripted and they sat over it and decided..........
That's exactly what we're against.
You Daniel Bryan fans disgustingly and annoyingly chanting YES and NO week after week
An undeserving and idiotic performer like DB being inserted into a match that could potentially mean he'll also participate in a triple threat for the WWE WHC.
And the way DB and his fans accomplish that is by some sort of a quasi-movement and so your stunted and ridiculous hero must get a chance to compete for the title.
When you DB fans keep asserting he got screwed time and time again, where does your understand that IT'S SCRIPTED go? HE GOT SCREWED BECAUSE THE WWE WANTED TO SCEW HIM AND HE'S NOT WWE CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.

And now that you've gotten what you've been wishing all along(for that pipsqueak to get a chance), the OP is against it because it looks like DB has just been handed over things because of quasi-movements that ruin pay-per-views and television that could very well do away without that idiot running around :-

Summerslam '13- John Cena just announces that he chooses DB for his opponent at Summerslam. Why? Why not Damien Sandow? WHy not CM Punk? Why not Roman Reigns, or the Great Khali? (I know I know, you'll go on bombarding me saying because BRYAN'S OVER).

Royal Rumble '14, Bryan is left out of the rumble, BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT HIM TO PARTICIPATE AND IT'S BATISTA THAT'S GOING TO BE MAIN-EVENTING. You sickening and disgusting DB fans once again ruin a pay-per-view ending with 3 bigger stars than Bryan ever will be- Batista, Sheamus and Roman Reigns.

Once, again more whining. That's the point OP made.

Finally, what happened on Raw, that disgusting display of a grownup child like Bryan and all those individuals whining and demanding a match against HHH with the added stipulation .(YEAH WE KNOW IT WAS SCRIPTED, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE AGAINST).

There was a time when guys like Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle, and Chris Benoit were winning Royal Rumbles and Tournaments to contend for the WWE/WHC.
Further with the Elimination Chamber event replacing No Way Out, even guys like HHH and Undertaker battled and won the Chamber match to contend for a World title.

What DB and his fans represent is a bunch of ******s who chant monosyllables week after week and the only way DB has been getting what he wants is because of you stupid fucks and your chants and because of guys like CM Punk abandoning this pathetic scenario. With ******s like Bryan around, I suppose Batista should go back to making movies too.
 
ONCE AGAIN, another reader who cannot understand the point OP tried to make. I'm not going to call you ignorant, dumb, or use any other demeaning adjective which should rightfully be adorned to you right now. That sort of shit suits the majority on here who resort to demeaning adjectives because they fail to understand things.

We damn well KNOW it's scripted and they sat over it and decided..........
That's exactly what we're against.
You Daniel Bryan fans disgustingly and annoyingly chanting YES and NO week after week
An undeserving and idiotic performer like DB being inserted into a match that could potentially mean he'll also participate in a triple threat for the WWE WHC.
And the way DB and his fans accomplish that is by some sort of a quasi-movement and so your stunted and ridiculous hero must get a chance to compete for the title.
When you DB fans keep asserting he got screwed time and time again, where does your understand that IT'S SCRIPTED go? HE GOT SCREWED BECAUSE THE WWE WANTED TO SCEW HIM AND HE'S NOT WWE CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.

And now that you've gotten what you've been wishing all along(for that pipsqueak to get a chance), the OP is against it because it looks like DB has just been handed over things because of quasi-movements that ruin pay-per-views and television that could very well do away without that idiot running around :-

Summerslam '13- John Cena just announces that he chooses DB for his opponent at Summerslam. Why? Why not Damien Sandow? WHy not CM Punk? Why not Roman Reigns, or the Great Khali? (I know I know, you'll go on bombarding me saying because BRYAN'S OVER).

Royal Rumble '14, Bryan is left out of the rumble, BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT HIM TO PARTICIPATE AND IT'S BATISTA THAT'S GOING TO BE MAIN-EVENTING. You sickening and disgusting DB fans once again ruin a pay-per-view ending with 3 bigger stars than Bryan ever will be- Batista, Sheamus and Roman Reigns.

Once, again more whining. That's the point OP made.

Finally, what happened on Raw, that disgusting display of a grownup child like Bryan and all those individuals whining and demanding a match against HHH with the added stipulation .(YEAH WE KNOW IT WAS SCRIPTED, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE AGAINST).

There was a time when guys like Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle, and Chris Benoit were winning Royal Rumbles and Tournaments to contend for the WWE/WHC.
Further with the Elimination Chamber event replacing No Way Out, even guys like HHH and Undertaker battled and won the Chamber match to contend for a World title.

What DB and his fans represent is a bunch of ******s who chant monosyllables week after week and the only way DB has been getting what he wants is because of you stupid fucks and your chants and because of guys like CM Punk abandoning this pathetic scenario. With ******s like Bryan around, I suppose Batista should go back to making movies too.

You do realize wwe isn't stupid. Sometimes they may seem stupid, like seeing that Batista winning the royal rumble. That's a mistake they clearly realize they made and they fixed it brilliantly. Wwe knows what they have with Bryan and the capitalized on it. If they didn't like him and didn't want to push him he wouldn't be on our tv every week and being shown the most on raw.

We chant the YES! chants and chanting DANIEL BRYAN because he's something new and something fresh, and he's damn fucking good at what he does. Best WRESTLER (notice how I said wrestler) in the wwe by far. And you comment about how he's undeserving, well I guess that's your opinion, and it's my opinion that your opinion is the dumbest fucking opinion I've ever seem. You and the op are the only 2 in this thread that agree with each other, isn't that saying something....

And you say the WWE wanted to screw him because he's not wwe championship material. I'll call bullshit! They had him face John Cena at SummerSlam for the WWE CHAMPIONSHIP. And go over, cleanly. Once again you realize that wwe had the match happen and just made it story line that John Cena picked Daniel Bryan. I guess you don't.... Randy Orton screwing him and HHH screwing him and turning heel was all done for storyline. They don't have a man they want to bury and screw open and close almost every raw since summerslam and main even PPVs. Your so idiotic it hurts.

SummerSlam '13: John Cena chooses Daniel Bryan because that's the match that the WWE bookers set up, because that's the match that everyone wants to see, not because john Cena came out and actually picked Daniel Bryan without wwe knowing nothing of it. Why not Damian Sandow? Well, he's currently not over in the slightest and wasn't over then either. Why not CM Punk? Well, because he was busy all summer with heyman, and there not going to just stop doing that storyline to face Cena for no apparent reason. Oh yeah, and he was to busy having match of the year at summerslam with Brock lesner. Why not Roman Reigns? Well, because people weren't into him as much as they are now. This years summerslam you can make a case for. And I don't remember what he was doing at summerslam but I'm sure he was with the shield. Why not Khali! Well, because.....for fucks sake are you kidding me, you hate bryan that much. I'm not even going to continue on that topic.

Royal Rumble '14: Daniel Bryan was left of the royal rumble to further storyline purposes. And I say that because of the tweet he sent out right after about "the machine holding him down" and first mentioned the YES MOVEMENT. That's why he was left out of the royal rumble. It was all storyline to set up a match at wrestle mania with either HHH or the Chanpionship match, but I'll let into that later.

What happened on raw was the most brilliant way they could have inserted Bryan into the match with Triple H. And he's earning his way into the championship match by beating triple H. It was something new, and something fresh, something that all the iwc is beg for and we finally get it, and two iwc jack offs hate it. Because yous two are the ones that are ******ed, not us, pretty much 90% of the wwe universe and 90% of the iwc who love Daniel Bryan.

I believe this was all a work for the most part. The two scenarios I believe we're happening for 'Mania if CM Punk didn't leave we're, CM Punk vs HHH and Daniel Bryan in the championship 3 way, or Daniel Bryan vs HHH and CM Punk in the championship 3 way. So since CM Punk walked out, the gave both spots to Bryan because they no he can compete at a high level in two matches on the grandest stage of them all. That's not the booking of someone they hate and someone they want to screw and bury. It was all storyline of him being held back, and not being givin championship opportunities. Not WWE saying, no we hate this guy, were gonna bury the hell at him and never have him on or wwe programming ever again, unless he's jobbing. That's the booking of someone that there 100% behind, and want that person to lead into the future of the business. No one is just handed a match with HHH at mania, it's something you have to earn and fight for, and Daniel Bryan was doing exactly that for the, well however long he's been in the WWE.

Your a jackass, rant over.
 
Oh believe me im not trolling anyone I genuinely hate Daniel Bryan. I have never been entertained by him and odds are I never will be. There are three things that need to happen before I'd ever like Daniel Bryan. 1) Get a better in ring set of moves. 2) Get some better theme music other than that terrible "Flight of the Valkyries" garbage. And 3) He needs to turn heel. But clearly none of these are happening any time soon of perhaps even ever. So until then I will continue to support the Randy Ortons, Batistas, Dolph Zigglers, CM Punks, AJ Styles, etc. of professional wrestling.


PLEEEEAAASE can we do something about this guy? Ban him, bully him... make him listen to Classical Music? Anything to stop this and the so called Renaissance man talking?

Why does Wagner work for Bryan? the same reason Strauss works for Ric Flair or in his most formative period Trips himself went for a bit of the "Ludvig Van".

By coming out to a classical piece you are instantly making a statement. That the mainstream is not where you are, that you believe and deserve something better and that your entrance is not "part of the programme. It is something to be enjoyed. Sure it's not Adam Rose or Brodus Clay's "Mama", it's not the "Oh You Didn't Know" but it's not supposed to be.. Any wrestler who chooses a classical theme is immedaitely elevated because as I mentioned, they CAN!!!

Imagine Ric Flair without Also Sprach Zaratuisa? No you can;t... to most it's 2001, but it IS Ric Flair...as much a part as the robes, the strut and Wooo... When Hunter Hearst Helmsley used Ode To Joy it was foreshadowing his "Degeneraton" as this was the central theme to A Clockwork Orange... look at his character, how it progressed and tell me I'm wrong... I dare you. Even Santino gets a pop cos he's using an opera based theme... imagine if they'd shelled out for Nessun Dorma... Randy Savage with Pomp and Circumstance, Bulldog with Rule Britannia.. even Mr. Perfect's theme was based off of classical pieces.

Want another reason Vince LOVE's guys who use classic themes... cos generally they are FREE to use. Out of Copyright, no $600k for Hogan to use Hendrix for a few matches... no buying a song and renaming it... just a classical piece that Johnston can arrange in his sleep for free... and it STILL get's over?

You genuinely hate Bryan, we get it... many here genuinely hate your posts...but we tolerate because it's part of the show...

Bryan IS the next big thing... he USES Wagner as his music (unless they shell out for "The Final Countdown" at Mania, which I can see for the first match) as the man once said... Like it, Loathe it but learn to live with it...
 
ONCE AGAIN, another reader who cannot understand the point OP tried to make. I'm not going to call you ignorant, dumb, or use any other demeaning adjective which should rightfully be adorned to you right now. That sort of shit suits the majority on here who resort to demeaning adjectives because they fail to understand things.

We damn well KNOW it's scripted and they sat over it and decided..........
That's exactly what we're against.
You Daniel Bryan fans disgustingly and annoyingly chanting YES and NO week after week
An undeserving and idiotic performer like DB being inserted into a match that could potentially mean he'll also participate in a triple threat for the WWE WHC.
And the way DB and his fans accomplish that is by some sort of a quasi-movement and so your stunted and ridiculous hero must get a chance to compete for the title.
When you DB fans keep asserting he got screwed time and time again, where does your understand that IT'S SCRIPTED go? HE GOT SCREWED BECAUSE THE WWE WANTED TO SCEW HIM AND HE'S NOT WWE CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.

And now that you've gotten what you've been wishing all along(for that pipsqueak to get a chance), the OP is against it because it looks like DB has just been handed over things because of quasi-movements that ruin pay-per-views and television that could very well do away without that idiot running around :-

Summerslam '13- John Cena just announces that he chooses DB for his opponent at Summerslam. Why? Why not Damien Sandow? WHy not CM Punk? Why not Roman Reigns, or the Great Khali? (I know I know, you'll go on bombarding me saying because BRYAN'S OVER).

Royal Rumble '14, Bryan is left out of the rumble, BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT HIM TO PARTICIPATE AND IT'S BATISTA THAT'S GOING TO BE MAIN-EVENTING. You sickening and disgusting DB fans once again ruin a pay-per-view ending with 3 bigger stars than Bryan ever will be- Batista, Sheamus and Roman Reigns.

Once, again more whining. That's the point OP made.

Finally, what happened on Raw, that disgusting display of a grownup child like Bryan and all those individuals whining and demanding a match against HHH with the added stipulation .(YEAH WE KNOW IT WAS SCRIPTED, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE AGAINST).

There was a time when guys like Brock Lesnar, Kurt Angle, and Chris Benoit were winning Royal Rumbles and Tournaments to contend for the WWE/WHC.
Further with the Elimination Chamber event replacing No Way Out, even guys like HHH and Undertaker battled and won the Chamber match to contend for a World title.

What DB and his fans represent is a bunch of ******s who chant monosyllables week after week and the only way DB has been getting what he wants is because of you stupid fucks and your chants and because of guys like CM Punk abandoning this pathetic scenario. With ******s like Bryan around, I suppose Batista should go back to making movies too.

Lol...."I'm not going to use any demeaning adjective which should rightfully be adorned"......

and theeeennnn
"What DB and his fans represent is a bunch of ******s who chant monosyllables week after week and the only way DB has been getting what he wants is because of you stupid fucks and your chants and because of guys like CM Punk abandoning this pathetic scenario."

Lol that's good stuff....so much hate... Which your entitled to of course. Try not to contradict yourself toooo to much ...

There's a very simple reason for this whole situation in which you 2 seem to hate.
The WWE brought Batista back and shoved him down our throats as a face and tossed him into the royal rumble winning it and going into the main event. The fans hate Batista.. Well a majority anyways from what I can see.. And they didn't want to have 2 heels squaring off in the main event at wrestlemania as the crowd really would have nobody to cheer for. So who's the most over guy at the moment (weather you like it or not) ... Daniel Bryan ... I know no matter what I say nothing will change your mind but I don't know where you get off calling him a shitty wrestler lol. But then to go as far as saying Batista is a better wrestler than him (when he had his first stint with the company maybe that argument had some cred) .... That's some bull... Don't let your anger cloud your judgment boys... Gawd:banghead:
 
Bryan's "Occupy Raw" stunt did seem forced and ham-fisted. However, I think it's WWE's way of putting into the storyline what happened in real life: fans consistently let it be known that anything less than Daniel Bryan in the main event of Wrestlemania was unacceptable, and as a result (with WWE realizing that Batista-Orton would be promptly shit on at Mania, and was nowhere near the draw they assumed) WWE acquiesced.

Taken on its own, I see why the segment appears to be the actions of a spoiled brat. But taken in the context of months--literally, months--of Daniel Bryan getting MASSIVE crowd reactions (not just "YES"ing, but "DANIEL BRYAN" during matches and segments unrelated to him, his successes getting the biggest positive responses on any given night, etc) and WWE ignoring them in favor of bland establishment stars, then it makes total sense, and it appears more like the "people rising up" and getting what they've demanded for months.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top