I don't want to by hypocritical here and I argued for Brody in the first round against Rikidozan. Hart>Brody ofc, but I think I'm taking Riki here too.
First, this is the problems I have with Rikidozan that others don't. Sure, he drew more than the rest of Japan, I'll take that. It's news to me that he was a bigger draw than Inoki - I intuitively thought it would be the other way round, but I have no facts to base that on. You guys do and I defer to that. That said - if you put Inoki in Rikidozans time, you really think he wouldn't achieve the same?
It's so, so hard to analyse guys who were done by the mid-60s. Respect their legacies, for some respect their workrate, but analysing how they would hold up in their prime against future wrestlers in their prime is so hard. Personally, I think in kayfabe Inoki would be a tougher opponent than Rikidozan. I'd certainly put him over Hart too though, so that doesn't detract me too much. I'd also put Thesz over Hart quite easily, and Rikidozan was billed as his equal during their matches. That certainly DOES influence me.
While Brody has a great record Vs the more current legends of Japan, Bret Hart doesn't. In fact, Bret Hart didn't have a great record vs many. Terrific worker, mad over, helped out the WWF at a bad time, never kayfabe set the world alight. He never got that big rub of going over a Hogan, or a Savage. He had his tv win over Flair, he had a Wrestlemania win over Piper, but after that he was thrust into the main event and billed as a fighting, but underdog champion. Bonafide main eventers he beat since then? Michaels, but before he was anywhere near his first title. Yoko, but that barely made an impression given it just cancelled out his loss at the previous Wrestlemania to him. Diesel is a legitimate one, but shortly after that he gave the clean rub to Michaels and let him have his run. After that he achieved nothing of note before giving the rub to Austin and readying him for superstardom. He won his fifth title against The Undertaker in a big win, before holding until the screwjob effectively ended his prime.
His WCW tenure was underwhelming too - a scattering of wins over Flair, a controversial series of wins over Goldberg that ended his career and a tournament win full of midcarders for the WCW title, other than Sting.
Basically, what I'm saying is his career, although a success, peaked in the early 90s of WWF easily. During that time, his big wins were Vs Roddy Piper for the IC title, Ric Flair on TV, Diesel on PPV and The Undertaker on PPV. That's it. He's certainly been selfless and helped out others careers more than anyone helped out his - that's to his credit in the business, not in a kayfabe tournament.
I think Rikidozan is overhyped. If everyone is in their prime here, his influence of an innovative trendsetter is nullified by his lack of competition during his time, compared to how loaded this tournament is. That said, Bret is certainly more overrated and I'm happy to give Riki the win here.
If Bret wins, fine. If Riki wins, he shouldn't get past Orton imo.