wwe future ...URGENT...

[Angle-HHH]

wwe is going to have a dark future yes u dunt think so well juzt lissen

rite now vince is a billionare with a profit of $47billion BUT here is a projected display of wwe future:

2006-2008 tna is growing and mite strike at wwe any other corp. mite strike on wwe so wwe needs a total of 16 billion usd to fight back

anytime a company from anywhere can sue wwe just like WWF WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION DID BACK IN 2002 so wwe can be sued for large amounts of money it can be tna ufc any large company it can be looask company and can sue wwe for making fake wrestling anything can happen so max amount of money wwe needs to cover this up must be around 20 billion usd

(1st)2009-2011: the dark age will be there if wwe didnt survive the war against tna or got shut down.
(2nd)2009-2011: wwe is good as ever with some money in hand wwe has survived the war and everything is well.

2011-2022: vince mcmahon mite die wwe writers mite die this will cause some money loss,new chairman doesnt know well and is not experienced mite do a mistake from which wwe gets shut down. if any thing like this happens wwe will loose about $12million per year if nothing like this happens still wwe to coverup the past have a cost of $2 million for some years

if anything wrong like this happens then by 2022 wwe will be history...

wwe can be changed now bring in old guys make new guys rise to the top and so on any suggestions ud like to make any comments?

 

[Yaszie_123]

WWE has been going on for ages! It isn't going to end anytime soon... WWE will probaly buy TNA!

 

[djmalachi]

Question- How did you come up with your estimates and you do realize that either HHH, Shane, or Stephanie will be the next chairman and they're pretty involved right now with the day to day operations in the WWE. So your claim of someone new being chairman and not being experienced is out the window. So re-group and come up with some other logical rational arguements. Now I agree that the WWE needs to focus more on creativity and stabilzing their talent and inproving more stable storylines....but to think that WWE after its 70 years of existence will be in the dark ages because of them being sued, well that arguement is very not supported. That's also why Vince has 30 lawyers on staff at his offices at Stamford, so he doesnt lose money and he can remain a stable company. Sorry dude just think about your arguements alot more in a realistic manner.

 

[jawn87]

i can see the point. i come to this site all the time after the pay per views, and i remember the buys from last year, and this year, lately...yes WWE has sucked in the story. its all about the story in my belief. yes, they need another Attitude movement and get all kinds of old guys back and they are letting the newer folk rise to the top, but it ends up sucking. the stories lately suck ass, like the whole eddie guerrero thing, i miss eddie, everyone else does to, WWE does, but why the hell would they even dawn upon the idea of using his death to make for a better story, it made it worse. rey vs chavo, that is about the gayest thing ever. they need a plan and a new movement and new stories, and they are good. as for TNA, i dont like TNA, it wouldnt make sense to sue them for anything, like TNA could sue them for the Umaga thing, stealing the Samoa Joe gimmick, but WWE can sue them for stealing the whole Kane gimmick for that masked dude, i dont know. i know that one day, eventually...WWE is going to cry whine and bitch, and finally buy out TNA. which should happen, it would give TNA more chances to wrestle, certainly a much bigger roster for Raw SD and ECW. thats just how i look at it.

 

[djmalachi]

Unfortunately the whole Chavo and Mysterio storyline was highly a touchy storyline to approach. That's why it took it so long to come about. Vince and WWE werent sure how to approach it. But we all know that they are all about pushing the enevelope and rememeber the WWE prides themselves in trying to make these family storylines believeable. Rememeber the whole custody for Dominic battle ? Its just another example of trying to be creative and attempts to raise ratings

 

[greenbeast95]

nice dark ages/star wars rendition of how the wwe will be destroyed by the force. Maybe TNA is the "new hope" but for now we're stuck with what we have.

 

[frank281]

Question- How did you come up with your estimates and you do realize that either HHH, Shane, or Stephanie will be the next chairman and they're pretty involved right now with the day to day operations in the WWE. So your claim of someone new being chairman and not being experienced is out the window. So re-group and come up with some other logical rational arguements. Now I agree that the WWE needs to focus more on creativity and stabilzing their talent and inproving more stable storylines....but to think that WWE after its 70 years of existence will be in the dark ages because of them being sued, well that arguement is very not supported. That's also why Vince has 30 lawyers on staff at his offices at Stamford, so he doesnt lose money and he can remain a stable company. Sorry dude just think about your arguements alot more in a realistic manner.

damn u are exactly right, but at the same time he has a point on something its gonna have some sort of dark age...but in my opinion when vince die 1 day,shane is going to take over,and i think hes gonna make risky choices,then the wwe MIGHT be like it was!!!!!

 

[RaTED-RKO]

are you a complete moron?

 

[krcampbell24]

This is the dumbest fucking thing I've ever read. Bar none. I've never been one to take financial predictions from an illiterate, let alone one who makes up numbers and information. Then again, what else would you expect from the naive trolls of Wrestlezone? All you fucking idiots who click links saying "KEVIN NASH AND SCOTT HALL AT ECW!! CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT!!" and things as such, what a joke. You're all a bunch of fucking losers.

 

[Angle-HHH]

excuse me i have projected this loss u dont think its true then u dont understand buisness wwe cant compete with tna for free and shane,hh,steph no prob they can be experienced all they want but somethings are better with mcmahon i mean wwe sucked before 1985 but when vince bought it then it was great awesome as ever BUT BUT what if shane has it and it starts to melt down? think money doesnt grow on trees and once a small mistake is made then wwe will just be history.

 

[jawn87]

that sounds really true,.....but honestly...i think HHH is getting the company. stephs got the kid, so its probably going to be between shane and HHH. maybe they will have an Athletic Decaphilon like on Billy Madison. that would make for some huge ratings. and do it on RAW and SMACKDOWN and maybe ECW since it will effect the entire company and not just one brand.

 

[undertaker69]

lol yea i think stephanie will take lindas job triple h and shane r both very qualified but shanemight get just because hes 100% blood

 

[Mean Mike]

What kind of a dumbass are you? Worlld Wrestling Entertainment, is not going to go out of business. The WWE has been in Vince's famliy for fucking years, Vincent McMahon own's one of the most succesful wrestling federations the world has ever seen, and Vince's Grandpa started the WWF. Which later became the most spectacular federations I have ever know. WWE has three branches off of it and they include; WWE Smackdown, WWE Raw, and ECW. So are you just trying to sperd some stupid shit around? And also do you know how to type and spell? This message board has a damn spell checker on it, USE IT.

 

[footballfool89]

just to let you know, when Vince does die, it will most likeyl be HHH to take his spot and hes experience and he will know what hes doing.

 

[greenbeast95]

Another thing to remember, the WWE isn't just a wrestling company. They are a worldwide organization and a publically traded company. It's going to take a heckuva of lot XFL's to get these to fold.

 

[D-Squared]

Why do people keep going on about TNA being massive in the future and perhaps running WWE out of business!

IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN!

Ive tried watching TNA and quite honestly it sucks! Jeff Jarrett is crap they hire all the old gits, Sting Steiner!

it is never going to be bigger than the WWE!

 

[Angle-HHH]

i dont say i like tna i juzt say that anything can happen and money is needed in everything i know vince is succesfull and the person who said i dunno how to spell is not with today's slang and mite be from the 1950's
tna is young i dont say wwe is better than tna or tna is better than wwe
i am not spreading crap around ova here this is real okay? this is projected loss not just a gimmick made by someone.
i knoe what wwe is and how succesful the mcmahon family is but nothing is damn perfect and something can cause wwe to die in the future.

NOTHING LIVES FOREVER NOT MCMAHON NOT WWE NOT TNA
JUZT MAKING U ALL AWARE THAT SOMEDAY WWE WILL BE HISTORY....ONLY IF THIS GOES ON AND RATINGS KEEP DROPING:
SEARCH ON GOOGLE ULL FIND THESE:

(5-6)1998: RATINGS 5,7,4,2,2,3,4,2,3,4,2,4,3,4,5,2,3,4,2,4,3,4,2,4,4
(6-7)1999: RATINGS 7,5,6,7,5,6,8,6,7,5,6,7,8,9(HIGHEST IN HISTORY)
(4-5)2000: DROPPED 5,4,4,3,4,5,5,4,4,4,5,2,3,4,5,6,4,3,4
(2-4)2001: DROPPED BADLY 5,4,3,2,4,2,3,2,3,1,3,2,4,2,4,2,1
AND THEN THIS SITE HAS DIRECTLY GIVEN 2002-2006

DROPPED AND UP 5,4,5,6,3,4,5,4,3,4,5,6,3,4,5,3,3,4,5,1,3,4
ITS ONLY 4,5,3 THERE ARE NO 8's and 7's

wwe is not the same heat it used to be
they have a dog undercontract in raw roster knwn as chole

wwe if keeps on losing money like this then just like i said......

 

[monstermash]

you, are on so much crack

 

[monstermash]

like thiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis much crack

 

[jefferson411]

Firstly, they're not paying the dog, I am pretty sure it belong to Torrie Wilson and they aren't paying her extra to bring it to the ring.

TNA has the potential to get big but not as long as Jarret is in charge. That is my opinion and it is not based on any statistics or anything, just what I've seen happen.

If you are looking for the "WWE killer" then its name is UFC. UFC is gaining a large following and in the future it could be stealing viewers away from WWE and if TNA wasn't on Spike anymore, then it would steal viewers from TNA also. I don't like UFC, I prefer staged fights like in wrestling because there is more exciting spots involved, but in my opinion (this is not a professional opinion, just a guy speaking by what he has heard and seen) UFC poses a greater threat to WWE than TNA does.

WWE will live on for a long time however, in some fashion or another. If they have financial problems they can gradually sell of parts of the business, maybe all of them until they're back to just a wrestling company, which is what they should be anyways!

And Vince McMahon leaving or dying will not kill WWE either, I promise HHH, Steph, and Shane are every but as unscrupulous as he has been and they know the business inside and out.

 

[theiceman]

First off, to the guy that posted this....the WWE isn't going out of business any time soon. They're actually MAKING MONEY now....don't believe it? It costs money to go into the film-making business and it costs money to bring back the ECW brand. Besides the movies and everything else, they've got three brands of wrestlers, three sets, three ring crews, three production crews, they have more wrestlers hired now more than ever. You think that we'd start seeing less of that if the WWE was worried about their future? You think they'd be making full-length movies on the silver-screen(nothing to do with wrestling) if they couldn't afford it? Your claims and estimates are fuckin ******ed. Ratings are down because the rosters are divided up. Those drops in ratings started to come when WCW was purchased and the whole brand extension thing came into play. It's common sense man, when you divide up the roster there's less star-power on both SHOWS. The WWE knew full well that their ratings were going to take a dive but they felt that it would be worth it because in turn, the WWE would be producing MORE STARS as a result of the brand extension and would in fact be alot better off then they were before if they were to bring the full roster back together again.

TNA has been losing money pretty much every year since they started. This year in fact was the first fuckin year that they even started drawing a profit...if they hadn't, they would probably be closer to death then they already are. It's more like the other way around.....TNA can't compete with the WWE right now because WWE is too big of a company. If TNA were to get a Monday Night primetime slot and tried competing directly with the WWE the way things are now, it would be company suicide for TNA. Don't call people out on their supposed "lack of business knowledge" when you clearly don't have any of your own.

 

[djmalachi]

Very well put iceman!!!!!

 

[Clarkey3262]

anytime a company from anywhere can sue wwe just like WWF WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION DID BACK IN 2002 so wwe can be sued for large amounts of money it can be tna ufc any large company it can be looask company and can sue wwe for making fake wrestling anything can happen so max amount of money wwe needs to cover this up must be around 20 billion usd

so TNA, by strange coincedence another company that promotes "fake wrestling" could sue WWE for doing exactly that?
UFC on the other-hand, different promotion completely promoting MMA and they will not care what WWE promote is not legit, on screen, WWE, TNA and ALL wrestling companys are "legit" off screen, to us on the internet and people who write the magazines ect they are not and often talk about possible outcomes and storylines, same as most soap on TV, unless they could get sue for promoting fake life??

 

[djmalachi]

I really dont know why this particular thread even exists. This was not a good discussion topic guys. It makes no sense and has no real logic to it

 

[PauLwaLL]

wwe is going to have a dark future yes u dunt think so well juzt lissen

rite now vince is a billionare with a profit of $47billion BUT here is a projected display of wwe future:

2006-2008 tna is growing and mite strike at wwe any other corp. mite strike on wwe so wwe needs a total of 16 billion usd to fight back

anytime a company from anywhere can sue wwe just like WWF WORLD WILDLIFE FOUNDATION DID BACK IN 2002 so wwe can be sued for large amounts of money it can be tna ufc any large company it can be looask company and can sue wwe for making fake wrestling anything can happen so max amount of money wwe needs to cover this up must be around 20 billion usd

(1st)2009-2011: the dark age will be there if wwe didnt survive the war against tna or got shut down.
(2nd)2009-2011: wwe is good as ever with some money in hand wwe has survived the war and everything is well.

2011-2022: vince mcmahon mite die wwe writers mite die this will cause some money loss,new chairman doesnt know well and is not experienced mite do a mistake from which wwe gets shut down. if any thing like this happens wwe will loose about $12million per year if nothing like this happens still wwe to coverup the past have a cost of $2 million for some years

if anything wrong like this happens then by 2022 wwe will be history...

wwe can be changed now bring in old guys make new guys rise to the top and so on any suggestions ud like to make any comments?

That makes almost no sence... Like you said.. The WWE is a multi billion dollor company.. And TNA is what like a couple hundred thousand? Maybe a million? If Vince see's someone competing with him.. He'll just buy it.. Like he did with wCw... The WWE will never go anywhere...