WrestleZone Debaters League

It is only to give you an idea of what the playoff picture will be at round 5. It is not set if 4 or 8 debaters make the playoffs.

It should be 8, I reckon. Otherwise people who have joined late, replacing a mostly loser, won't have a chance, whereas if D-Man dropped out, they could get in the final without really trying.
 
It should be 8, I reckon. Otherwise people who have joined late, replacing a mostly loser, won't have a chance, whereas if D-Man dropped out, they could get in the final without really trying.

Yes, this is what I was thinking. I think its best with 8.

tdiglÉric Rohmer;1373646 said:
I don't know how the hell Franchize1990 isn't in the playoff picture.

He has been in a great division. He has done extremely well.
 
In regards to my sort of no-show this week, TM, I sent you a PM on the sunday or monday explaining that I would be unavailable from wednesday to sunday. I then had other things and couldn't post before it. But did you not get the pm or what?
 
I got it, I just wanted you to have a post, so we can give you all the points. But I think Tdigle went ahead and gave you the points already. So I guess I wont make you make the post as one judge has already decided you were to get the points.
 
I got it, I just wanted you to have a post, so we can give you all the points. But I think Tdigle went ahead and gave you the points already. So I guess I wont make you make the post as one judge has already decided you were to get the points.

Grand, I thought you didn't get it because I was gone when you asked me to post.
 
Dont worry about it mate, you will be getting the clean sweep.

Hopefully in a few hours, however, your next opponent wont go so easily on you.
 
SK, you and Lariat just had one hell of an amazing debate. It will be hard to divide up the points for that one.
 
A suggestion, if someone in a debate gets 13 points, even if not all of the judges have judged, you count the debate as finished. This will help things move faster, especially with a bunch of week 2 and 3 debates that need to be judged.

Also, if you get a mod to lock all of the debates that don't need judging, I'd reckon it'd be easier for the judges
 
A suggestion, if someone in a debate gets 13 points, even if not all of the judges have judged, you count the debate as finished. This will help things move faster, especially with a bunch of week 2 and 3 debates that need to be judged.

Also, if you get a mod to lock all of the debates that don't need judging, I'd reckon it'd be easier for the judges

They can't do that. The standings are based on 5 judges. The total number of points is necassary. Its better to win by miles, than inches.
 
Well GD, people know that once you reach 13 points you win, but points are still needed. That is why I keep a semi running tab of debates that have been decided before all 5 judges have judged. Such as when IC beat 48.7 after 3 judges made it 14-1. As for locking the threads, it might be a good idea.
 
Maybe if individual debaters presented their debates to judges, they would do it, I am not sure. I have asked the judges to judge more often, and some have started. Also, Luther dropped out as a judge.
 
I can't believe that I've missed my chance to debate Tastycles. That was the match I was looking forward to the most. Sadness.

In other news, majorly looking forward to taking Irish out for another spin; haven't crossed paths with that guy since Bigelow against Flair.
 
In other news, majorly looking forward to taking Irish out for another spin; haven't crossed paths with that guy since Bigelow against Flair.

Likewise. You're someone who ALWAYS pushes me to another level. I hope we get a big topic that we can both tee off on. I will be able to post at least once / day this week.
 
This weeks debate fucking rocks. I've been meaning to get into this question for an age.

Not only that, I get to rip the shit out of Buddy Rogers. What could be better than that.
 
My response is up if you all want to check it out. It's short, sweet and to the point and I'm proud of it
 
TM I think you made a mistake in my debate. It says it's me vs. Tastycles however in the thread it says I am facing Franchize1990...and shouldn't I be the home debater since I wasn't the home debater in the previous round against IC?

Also, it would be highly appreciated if the judges could please the debates I had with IC, Dave, and Lariat. Thank You :).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,824
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top