However, if you wish to debate it.. lets take a look. Edge v. Undertaker, no gimmick needed for going on 3 straight Pay Per View matches and its still selling to more people than Joe v. Angle.
Yeah that would have nothing to do with the fact that probably at least 200% more people are actualy aware of the WWE product compared to TNA's.
And to suggest that it was actually the Edge vs Taker match that sold all the PPV's is unrealistic to say the least (Im trying to be nice here). Just like JOE vs Angle wasn't the sole reason for TNA's fans purchasing that PPV.
Yeah, because while the W.W.E. understands its fans aren't complete morons.. apparently T.N.A. feels its fans are completely stupid enough to think a Street Fight renamed 20 different times can still sell more and more with each new name.
Yeah, because while TNA understands its fans aren't complete morons... apparently WWE feels its fans are completely stupid enough to think that GOD is actualy wrestling Vince McMahon as Shawn Michaels partner!!!apparently WWE think GOD can sell...
Let me tell you something. If you polish a turd, its still a turd.
AGREED! No matter how much you dress it up with fancy lighting and HD sets, shitty wrestling is still shitty wrestling, especially when you have the likes of TNA and ROH showing how it should be one (irrispective of the gimmick).
I can see why you like T.N.A. with the first thing you said. And you contradict yourself with the second.
Before you even ask. I say you contradict yourself because first you praise T.N.A. for giving us gimmick after gimmick, then even you say they're overdone.
No I was simply highliting that although I personaly think the gimmicks are a little overdone, they should at least be praised for trying to give us something different every time. What is wrong with that?
By giving us the exact same gimmicks, repackaged with a different name, every week?
Do you even watch T.N.A., weekly?
Much like the lyrics on songs today, it is very difficult to go in a direction that hasn't already been done. Can you give me 52 examples of different matches that haven't already been done? So that we can then see something fresh every week of the year?
I doubt it, so while WWE will simply do the same shit over and again, TNA at least try to spice it up a bit. Again, what is wrong with that?
And yes mate... I do watch TNA weekly and have done for the past 3 years now. And I can honestly say, I enjoy it more now than ever.
Thats my opinion and Im entitled to it. I guarantee Im not the only one.
I would completely hope you would. Because you're making yourself look like a fool with these outlandish claims.
Your opinion, sure some would agree, but then a lot of people would side with what I've said. Thats the great thing about having competition in the wrestling industry. It gives us something to (dis)agree on and debate.
WWE has one great match every couple of PPV's. TNA has great matches on nearly every week. The fool is the one who would look at this in WWE's favour.
Look, I love T.N.A., I'm a fan of it.. but you're arguing about T.N.A. having far superior wrestling, to the W.W.E. in a thread asking which Pay Per View is better. Bound For Glory, or Wrestlemania. Whats next on your list of things to do?
Try reading the post again and you will see that the reason I brought up TNA's wrestling was due to it being one of my reasons for choosing BFG over WM.
I really don't understand what your getting at here? It was a logical point I brought up. Again, try reading the original post.
Perhaps you'd like to create a thread in the T.N.A. section, asking people who they'd prefer.. Sharkboy or Steve Austin. Lets see how great T.N.A. wins that war.
Yep, given this sites age demographic Im sure Stone Cold would win hands down.
But then lets try having a vote on a website aimed at 3 - 9 year olds and ask them the same question. Im sure Shark Boy would win THAT one hands down.
Point is, Sharkboy is used to garner younger fans for TNA. Much like WWE is doing with their new comic book magazine segment which has the Hardy's fighting space monsters on other planets lol.
Now I'll touch upon one of your previous points:
you're arguing about T.N.A. having far superior wrestling, to the W.W.E. in a thread asking which Pay Per View is better. Bound For Glory, or Wrestlemania. Whats next on your list of things to do?
You said something about hypocrites?
Perhaps you'd like to create a thread in the T.N.A. section, asking people who they'd prefer.. Sharkboy or Steve Austin. Lets see how great T.N.A. wins that war.
So what relevance was that to this thread?