Would you rather see the Rock or Reigns take on Lesnar for Wrestlemania 31? | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Would you rather see the Rock or Reigns take on Lesnar for Wrestlemania 31?

I think Lesnar vs. Rock would be an awesome match but it has to be not for a title, if it's for the title than it loses a lot, I mean everybody will assume that Lesnar would win and if Rock would win then I don't think it's a great idea because he will have to lose it at next RAW or next PPV because hes even bigger part timer, so I see Reigns vs. Rollins for the title the tricky part for the wwe is how to take of the title from Brock and create believable storyline vs. The Rock? they could use that fact that Reigns and Rock are cousins but still... Rollins cash in on Brock would be dumb because like I said before they are both heels, so the only thing they could do is have Reigns vs. Rollins match at Royal Rumble for the briefcase after Reigns win, the following weeks have Rock come back on some RAW then Reigns could cash in on Lesnar and have Rock cost him the title and then here you go you have 2 great storylines
 
I say either go with Reigns or a regular who is closest to being ready to give Lesnar a good match at WM31. I understand Vince's love for Rock vs. Lesnar but I don't think its wise to shun the whole WWE locker room like that, something like that could cripple morale in WWE.

My biggest issue with the match really comes down to it doesn't do anything for the roster. Buyrate's aren't much of a concern at this point with the WWE Network especially since it's started to go international and by the time WM31 rolls around it will be even less so. They will pack Levi's stadium regardless of the main event so why have Lesnar vs. Rock? Its something that will get publicity no question but chances are it won't make a shit ton more money for WWE than whatever else they might do and beating The Rock doesn't mean shit for Brock, Rock beating Brock would be an even bigger waste of time so there's no good reason to do it.

Go with a new star, if Reigns isn't ready don't use him and just find someone who could have a great match with Lesnar so they can get a solid rub. They don't have to win but if someone like Cesaro or Bryan hung with Lesnar for 20-30 minutes and came close to winning then it could really help build someone new and add some depth to the future main event lineup.
 
I'd rather see Reigns vs. Lesnar. This presents the best opportunity to create another mega star. At WM XXX, we saw the rise of Daniel Bryan. At WM XXXI, we could see the rise of Reigns.

You can't depend on these part timers forever.

I'd love for Reigns, Ambrose, Rollins, Cesaro (FCW Class of 2012) become stars like Orton, Cena, Lesnar and Batista (OVW Class of 2002)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top