Will The Rock become a 10 time World Champion? | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Will The Rock become a 10 time World Champion?

I sure hope they don't put the title on him. They gave him his big win over Cena to prove he still has it so his function should be putting people over now. I have nothing but respect for the rock and am happy that hes giving back to the buisness that made him. WWE doesn't need to thank him with a title run, beating Cena clean means much more than that anyway. The Rock is so much bigger than the title theres no point in putting the strap back on him. If anything they run the risk of having the fans turn on him if they put him over on the wrong person. When Hogan beat Yoko for Brets title at Wrestlemania 9 it was a slap in the face to real wrestling fans. Hogan was smart enough not to feud with Bret because he knew that the fans wouldn't be on his side. putting Rock over on Punk would have the same affect in my opinion. The only person that that the fans would side with Rock over would be possibly Cena. And the rock already beat him. Nothing to prove. Put him in the hunt but he sure as hell shouldn't go over.
 
Ever since Rocky told the world he wanted WWE Championship gold around his waist again, it's been pretty much a guarantee he'll get it again some day down the line. Hell, if his schedule allowed it, he probably would have been champion again already.

There's nothing wrong with that either. Sure it's great for Punk to have his nice long reign and have guys like Ziggler, Bryan and Kane up in the title picture, but no one, not even John Cena, would bring more focus to that belt then The Rock could. Everyone has been going on about the title "losing prestige" for what seems like forever, with the hot potato thing, the not being in the main event, the belt becoming a prop etc etc. Well all of a sudden, how good does the prop look when someone like The freaking Rock, who's one of the biggest wrestling legends of all-time as well as a big-time hollywood celebrity, makes it his #1 priority.

I'd love to see Rocky get that title reign somewhere down the line, but from what I've heard he's got one helluva busy schedule, I doubt he'll be able to make consistent appearances on Raw until after WM next year. Sure he could probably appear at random shows, but I'm not really keen for a reign where he wins it one night, shows up 'via satellite' the next three weeks and then drops the title at the next ppv. When it happens, he's gotta be able to actually appear consistently as champion (or at least most of the time he's champion).

But yeah, to answer the question, yep, Rocky's gonna be a ten time champ, and that's awesome. I wouldn't expect it until next year sometime after WM29, but if they do pull the trigger on it this year (possibly to set up Cena/Rocky II), it would still be awesome.
 
Yes, I think The Rock will be Champion again, and he should be.

When one of the all-time greats, and biggest box office attractions in the history of the business comes back, even for a short run, it makes sense to make the most of it.

The Rock is now one of the biggest drawing actors on the planet, so we know he will never be a full-time wrestler again, but the fans still adore the guy. Him making an appearance on a WWE show is a BIG deal, and it puts asses in seats and PPV buys. He has done it all in the business, and whoever ends up beating him for the title will get a huge boost in credibility by doing so.

If The Rock became champion, he could get so much mainstream publicity for WWE, and we all know McMahon craves that. Imagine if Rocky took the title with him to a film premier or awards show, the press would be all over it, and WWE would get some major attention, it would be a great idea to put the title back on Rocky, even for a couple of months.

He has said he wants it, it makes sense to give The Great One what he wants.
 
Yes, I think The Rock will be Champion again, and he should be.

When one of the all-time greats, and biggest box office attractions in the history of the business comes back, even for a short run, it makes sense to make the most of it.

The Rock is now one of the biggest drawing actors on the planet, so we know he will never be a full-time wrestler again, but the fans still adore the guy. Him making an appearance on a WWE show is a BIG deal, and it puts asses in seats and PPV buys. He has done it all in the business, and whoever ends up beating him for the title will get a huge boost in credibility by doing so.

If The Rock became champion, he could get so much mainstream publicity for WWE, and we all know McMahon craves that. Imagine if Rocky took the title with him to a film premier or awards show, the press would be all over it, and WWE would get some major attention, it would be a great idea to put the title back on Rocky, even for a couple of months.

He has said he wants it, it makes sense to give The Great One what he wants.

You hit the nail right on the head in terms of mainstream exposure, which is what Vince will want. If he wins the belt it will be all over E! and he'll be on the talkshows and stuff with the belt. It will get mainstream media to talk positively about WWE.
 
I actually never thought of the Rock facing Taker at WM for the title. I have to give you credit for that BPP. That being said, whenever Taker is off for a period of time and comes back for that one WM match, most of the time the matches are good, but a couple of them suck. If they have that match, Taker and Rock better bring their A game.

I always try to think outside the box when it comes to possible scenarios in wrestling. Unfortunately, WWE stopped trying to think outside the box or attempting to shock us long ago. Of course, anything WWE has really done since the demise of WCW has been a disappointment or not lived up to it's full potential. While WWE has still had it's good moments since 2002, there hasn't been a sense of urgency for them since their main competition went under.

As far as a possible Rock/Taker match @ WM, I do agree both guys would have to bring their A games. In that respect, it's probably too late for them to have a great match since Taker is nearing retirement and Rock isn't around enough to make an impact. However, I do think adding in the WWE Title would make the match mean more and be something no one would expect. Even though them facing off at WM probably wouldn't be a five star classic, it IMO could be a main selling point for WM(much like Cena/Rock was last year).

Here's the thing I want to ask:
Why didn't people say it was a slap in the face of full time wrestlers when Brock Lesnar came back and became the main event against Cena ? Or Undertaker showing up just to keep the streak alive at WM ?
Or when HBK came back and wouldn't work House shows ? Why the double standard ?

You raise a valid point here. Fans complain about The Rock coming back and "stealing the spotlight" from full time wrestlers, yet the examples you listed were equally "insulting" to those same full time wrestlers. As far as I'm concerned, Rock, Taker, HBK and Lesnar all made huge impacts in wrestling and earned the right to come in and call their shots. If it's so bad for business, then why would WWE allow them to do it? The answer is very simple, the current roster in WWE is in such bad shape that the former big names can come in and overshadow them at free will. Part of that is the new generation not stepping up and part of that is WWE not fully commiting to establishing a new top name(ironic since Lesnar's departure basically started WWE's fear to make new guys).

The bottom line here is if you have name value, then you can negotiate better deals and bigger paydays for yourself. While it may not seem fair to the current generation to see guys like Rock, Taker, HBK and Lesnar come back and automatically main event, they've earned it. If fans truly didn't want to see it, WWE wouldn't allow it. So yeah, it's definately a double standard that most have no logical basis to complain about.

If the Rock comes back and wins the title for a tenth time, it wouldn't be any more different or any more attention needing, vain, unnecessary than Rick Flair's number of title reigns, or Triple H's number or John Cena's or any one else's. He's getting that reign because he is the one who can make the most money for the company as their champion. If any one thinks there is some one who can do a better job than Rock to garner that attention, you're fucking kidding yourselves.

The Rock is a huge draw and brings attention back to wrestling. He's from the Attitude era, so automatically, he will draw some nostaligia fans with his return(and in this instance WWE Title run). While I can certainly understand the logic that him main eventing upsets some fans and wrestlers, it doesn't really make sense. It's not as if The Rock is holding them down. WWE not pushing new stars and the new gen not stepping up is the reason The Rock can come in and dictate his position. Besides, if you are good enough, you'll rise to the top and be noticed. CM Punk is living proof of that. He's the WWE Champion, and more often that not, Cena still has the top spot at PPV's. Does that hurt CM Punk??? I'd say not, since he's still having probably the best matches on those PPV's with Daniel Bryan.
 
I think I will say my full predictions for the wwe title until wrestle mania and after it:
my thoughts is that.for me there is one possible option and is that cena will win the match.my thought is about what is going to happend after it.it's normal that on summerslam cena will defend the title against punk when punk will win but in night of champions he will lose it back to cena in hell in a cell and retain it on survivor series.after that at the TLC cena will defend the title against big show which which cena will lose the title but he will win it back in the royal rumble.in the elimination chamber he will retain the title in an elimination chamber match whick after it the rock will attack him. like everybody here think I think the rock will win the rumble and go on to WM but I think john cena will get he's revange of wrestle mania 28.but on extreme rules the rock get a rematch against cena when he will win the title and have his 10th region as a world champion.
 
He can be. If everything lines up right on the which PPV and the opponents or Champ at the time, yes. Why wouldn’t he be able? The only thing though he would have to come around and wrestle a lot more. He would have to defend the title technically once every 30days. I wouldn’t mind. He still has it.
 
I think the Rock is going to win the belt for the tenth time. The fans want to see him with the belt again, like they wanted to see Hollywood Hulk Hogan to win the belt in 2002. He is going to win it at the Rumble and then drop it at Wrestlemania.
 
The one thing I don't like about all this, don't get me wrong. The Rock IMO deserves to be a ten time champion, if they can give the belt to Hogan back in '02 he even won with a LEG DROP for crying out loud!!!!! So yes, Rock deserves it, but he will win at the Rumble and go on to do what The Rock does absolute BEST at Wrestlemania, LOSE a WWE title match. 15,16,17.
 
There doesn't even need to be a discussion. He will win. It's simple. The Rock beat John Cena at Wrestlemania in his (The Rock's) hometown. Payback will be John Cena, the current WWE guy, beating The Rock for the title (thus making the win more important) in the NYC area. This is how they justify Cena losing in the first place.

A bonus is that Punk gets to work with The Rock and fans get the rumple + that match instead of something like Del Rio vs Sheamus.
 
He will. It's pretty much set in stone. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see it and I can't wait to see the Rock hold the belt in the air for the 10th time. I look forward to his match with Punk, It'll be awesome although I have no doubt Punk will carry the majority of the match. I just don't want to see Rock/Cena 2. That, I do NOT look forward to.
 
It kind of makes sense to give him the belt, as much as some people don't want to see the belt placed on a part-timer. If he were to walk around with the belt it'd give the WWE some great publicity. I'm not sure what to do with him after, but for the short-term at least he'd get a ton of people in seats to see him be the WWE champion.
 
The Rock wants to win it, but i doubt Dwayne Johnson gives a **** about it. I dont think he cares at all, its what Vince wants.

Cena Rock was billed as once in a lifetime, thats obviously just wrestling promoter shenanigans to sell tickets. Its why they will give the belt to Rock and get Cena the RR win so the match feels "organic".

The buyrate for Mania was such that doing another one of these matches makes sense. Cena vs Brock was done and they are most likely saving Cena vs Taker for WM 30 as it makes more sense.
 
The Rock will become the new WWE champion at the Rumble. He will beat Punk for the title. Cena will win the Royal Rumble match, face Rock at Mania 29 to become the new WWE champion as well as avenging last years loss to Rock at Mania 28. Way to be unpredictable WWE.
 
Hell yeah Rock is gonna win the tittle even though he wont be able to commite full-time he should be able to draw to the ppv. WWE needs the ratings even for a short time. I just cant see Rock staying past Mania because he has like 3 movioe set for prodution next year. WWE will do what they need to keep the Rock being around every other week. The truth is Raw blows sick not enough actual talent coming up and arent living up to the day-to-day operation. Cena is slowly becoming a Ring General he is lacking competions. Shemus isnt getting enough push but all he has is Del Rio who is talented but cant stop taking time off for injury. Zigller cheerleading days are over but he has alot to still learn. Miz is GReat lost alot of push last year after mania. But is a marketable HEEL and great ring performer aside from that what do they have. These are keys why WWE needs the Rock ... CM punk needs to have a Feud with the ROck ...
 
I'd have to go with NO. Just based on logic.

Okay so it seems pretty obvious Rock will beat Punk for the title at the Rumble. but why??

I don't think anyone wants Cena/Rock II at Mania, ESPECIALLY not me! And that is really the only reason to give Rocky the title, so he could "up the antee".

He is a bonafied legend, that can have a good match with anybody, and has all the tools to build a feud without the title. He can face anyone, anytime and doesn't need the "prop".

Only reason I can see Vince doing so is to make Rocky once again hold the record for most WWE titles, which I believe HHH tied him for with his last title reign.
 
I'd have to go with NO. Just based on logic.

Okay so it seems pretty obvious Rock will beat Punk for the title at the Rumble. but why??

I don't think anyone wants Cena/Rock II at Mania, ESPECIALLY not me! And that is really the only reason to give Rocky the title, so he could "up the antee".

He is a bonafied legend, that can have a good match with anybody, and has all the tools to build a feud without the title. He can face anyone, anytime and doesn't need the "prop".

Only reason I can see Vince doing so is to make Rocky once again hold the record for most WWE titles, which I believe HHH tied him for with his last title reign.

Rock winning the belt = more money and exposure for WWE and that's why they're going to do it. If/when he wins it, you can be sure, he'll take the belt with him on every talk show, and every publicity event for his movies. The point will be to bring WWE to everyone's attention and bring back the mainstream audience. Vince is a business man and he knows how popular The Rock is now in Hollywood and that his association with wrestling has not hurt his acting career like it has for so many others. Vince will want the Hollywood audience to get interested in WWE, even if it's only for a short period of time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top